Re: Build Failures

2016-04-21 Thread Aki Sukegawa
üngliche Nachricht- > From: Jim King > Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2016 3:40 PM > To: dev@thrift.apache.org ; jsir...@apache.org > Subject: RE: Build Failures > > Now it's failing a different way: > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Thrift-precommit/425/ > > Merging

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-16 Thread Jens Geyer
rday, April 16, 2016 3:40 PM To: dev@thrift.apache.org ; jsir...@apache.org Subject: RE: Build Failures Now it's failing a different way: https://builds.apache.org/job/Thrift-precommit/425/ Merging refs/tags/changes/425 git rev-parse refs/tags/changes/425^{commit} # timeout=10 FATAL: Co

RE: Build Failures

2016-04-16 Thread Jim King
nvoke(Method.java:606) -Original Message- From: Jim King Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 10:14 AM To: 'dev@thrift.apache.org' ; 'jsir...@apache.org' Subject: RE: Build Failures I got one build through (which failed in "d" tests) and now it's stuck in t

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread John Sirois
udson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.defaultCheckout(AbstractBuild.java:607) >>>> >> >> at >>>> >> >> >>>> jenkins.scm.SCMCheckoutStrategy.checkout(SCMCheckoutStrategy.java:86) >>>> >> >&g

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread Aki Sukegawa
9) >>> >> >> at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1738) >>> >> >> at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43) >>> >> >> at >>> >> >> hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:9

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread John Sirois
t; at >>>>> >> >> >>>>> hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.determineRevisionToBuild(GitSCM.java:951) >>>>> >> >> at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.checkout(GitSCM.java:1054) >>>>> >> >> at huds

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread John Sirois
gt;> at >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>> hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.defaultCheckout(AbstractBuild.java:607) >>>> >> >> at >>>> >> >> >>>> jenkins.scm.SCMCheckoutStrategy.checkout(SCM

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread Jake Farrell
gt; at >>> >> >> hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:98) >>> >> >> at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:410) >>> >> >> Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Command "git checkout >>>

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread John Sirois
t; >> >> >> stderr: error: you need to resolve your current index first >> >> >> >> >> >> It looks like the build environment is not forced clean at the >> >> beginning >> >> >> of each build. >> >> &

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread Aki Sukegawa
rge >>>> >> >>>> >> stderr: error: you need to resolve your current index first >>>> >> >>>> >> It looks like the build environment is not forced clean at the >>>> beginning >>>> >> of each build.

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread Jake Farrell
is odd that the git portion of these builds went sideways since the > >> > Jenkins Job Config History auditing plugin shows the last change > >> (before my > >> > tweak last night) was 2016-02-16_02-09-39. I expect jenkins or its > >> plugins > >> &

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread John Sirois
eginning >>> >> of each build. >>> >> >>> > >>> > Ack - looking now. >>> > >>> > It is odd that the git portion of these builds went sideways since the >>> > Jenkins Job Config History auditing plugin shows the last c

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread John Sirois
er. >> > >> >> OK - that analysis was wrong, clearly there has been a change in the build >> itself that modifies source code and this causes the issue. >> I've enabled >> with >> the following description: >> >> Clean up the worksp

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread Aki Sukegawa
space before every checkout by deleting all untracked > files and directories, including those which are specified in .gitignore. > It also resets all *tracked* files to their versioned state. This ensures > that the workspace is in the same state as if you cloned and checked out in > a bra

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread John Sirois
--hard HEAD` to me, which should do it. That should insulate CI from bad tests that modify checked in repo state, but those tests shouldn't exist either. COMMITTERS: I'd like to reiterate to any committers out there that red CI must be a hard bright line that is not crossed when accepting pa

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread John Sirois
16_02-09-39. I expect jenkins or its plugins were updated by infra causing the previously working job config to not work any longer. > - Jim > > -Original Message- > From: Jim King > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 10:34 PM > To: dev@thrift.apache.org; 'jsir...@apache.org'

RE: Build Failures

2016-04-14 Thread Jim King
im -Original Message- From: Jim King Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 10:34 PM To: dev@thrift.apache.org; 'jsir...@apache.org' Subject: RE: Build Failures The builds were failing claiming that a file was in the middle of being merged and they were all failing early. I th

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-13 Thread John Sirois
> -Original Message- > From: John Sirois [mailto:jsir...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 9:58 PM > To: dev@thrift.apache.org > Subject: Re: Build Failures > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:54 PM, John Sirois wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2

RE: Build Failures

2016-04-13 Thread Jim King
esday, April 13, 2016 9:58 PM To: dev@thrift.apache.org Subject: Re: Build Failures On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:54 PM, John Sirois wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Jim King wrote: > >> I’m still looking for answers on pull request build failures. >> >> I

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-13 Thread John Sirois
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:57 PM, John Sirois wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:54 PM, John Sirois wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Jim King >> wrote: >> >>> I’m still looking for answers on pull request build failures. >>> >>> I have 2 or 3 PRs open right now and they’ve

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-13 Thread John Sirois
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:54 PM, John Sirois wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Jim King wrote: > >> I’m still looking for answers on pull request build failures. >> >> I have 2 or 3 PRs open right now and they’ve failed in the apache >> precommit builds for strange reasons. >> >> The

Re: Build Failures

2016-04-13 Thread John Sirois
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Jim King wrote: > I’m still looking for answers on pull request build failures. > > I have 2 or 3 PRs open right now and they’ve failed in the apache > precommit builds for strange reasons. > > The apache internal builds seem to be failing. > I think the answer i