Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Hi, Simon and others,
I did not get any response for my request for help on the 2.0 Policy
issues (see the thread under " How to add new security extension to
Tuscany binding.ws?" and " Tuscany 2.0 policy"), so I went ahead down to
the second path Simon
Having contributed such insight .. can I ask, Sebastien, how can I
recreate what you saw?
I just checked out that module in your sandbox and it all ran fine
without having to tweak any of the runtime code.
Thanks,
Scott
It's intentional...
This is the unwrapped type (wrapperStyle=false), but we define a
source-databinding wrapper (non-null) to help us transform to the
wrapped type.
Though the names aren't the best.. I don't think it's too bad until we
added the 'sourceBare' to the mix.
I think Raymond added thi
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Hi,
I'm wondering if policies are all implemented and functioning in Tuscany
2.0. I don't seem to be able to find a sample that uses policy. Nor can
I get my policy extension, which is converted from Tuscany 1.6, to work.
The policy defined in the contri
Mike,
JAX-WS seems to specify something similar to your suggestion.
Under the WSDL->Java section it says:
--
2.3.4.3 Message and Part
The asynchronous mapping supports both wrapper and non-wrapper mapping
styles, but di
On 21/01/2011 14:13, Scott Kurz wrote:
I saw that too and manually installed it after finding an earlier
thread on this ML (too lazy to link).
Got the JAR here:
http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/sca-j/Release/org/oasis-open/sca/j/sca-caa-apis/1.1-CD04/sca-caa-apis-1.1-CD04.jar
Th
I saw that too and manually installed it after finding an earlier
thread on this ML (too lazy to link).
Got the JAR here:
http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/sca-j/Release/org/oasis-open/sca/j/sca-caa-apis/1.1-CD04/sca-caa-apis-1.1-CD04.jar
The earlier thread discussed things like if
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Mike Edwards
wrote:
> On 21/01/2011 11:07, Mike Edwards wrote:
>>
>> On 20/01/2011 23:29, ant elder wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Scott Kurz wrote:
I just committed what I hope is a fix in r1061531.
It made the copyInput Index
Folks,
I think that the recent work on Holder support has revealed something worth
discussing.
The OASIS specs define a specialized form of Java interface for service implementations that are
asynchronous - ie where the response may be delivered from a separate thread long after the request
h
On 21/01/2011 11:07, Mike Edwards wrote:
On 20/01/2011 23:29, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Scott Kurz wrote:
I just committed what I hope is a fix in r1061531.
It made the copyInput IndexOutOfBoundsException in
sample-implementation-extension go away... (will give some mor
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Mike Edwards
wrote:
> On 20/01/2011 23:29, ant elder wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Scott Kurz wrote:
>>>
>>> I just committed what I hope is a fix in r1061531.
>>>
>>> It made the copyInput IndexOutOfBoundsException in
>>> sample-implementation-ex
On 20/01/2011 23:29, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Scott Kurz wrote:
I just committed what I hope is a fix in r1061531.
It made the copyInput IndexOutOfBoundsException in
sample-implementation-extension go away... (will give some more
thought to whether this fix to interfac
On 20/01/2011 21:17, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Scott Kurz wrote:
I recreated that MediatorImpl.copyInput failure now... Maybe the
problem was that earlier I ran "offline" and had something stale in my
mvn repo???
Anyway..looking into both problems now..
What was a modu
13 matches
Mail list logo
