Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 06, 2025
+1 - binding - checked reproducibility (fab does not pass it), signatures, checksums, licences, checked all my changes - except fab size and reproducibility all is good. On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 8:52 AM Elad Kalif wrote: > common.messaging and fab are excluded from this vote > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 9:22 AM Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > +1 non binding. > > > > Tested my changes which primarily lied in these buckets: > > > > CI / static check fixes: > > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48671 > > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48666 > > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48808 > > > > Actual changes > > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48826 > > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46231 > > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48683 > > > > Ran this as well as a couple of test dags and all seem to work as > expected. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Amogh Desai > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 7:54 AM Vishnu Chilukoori < > > vish.chiluko...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 non-binding > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Vishnu. Chilukoori > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 12:02 PM Pankaj Koti > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 non-binding > > > > > > > > Tested my PR in the Databricks provider, it's included in the RC and > > the > > > > changes run as expected. Thanks for the release efforts! > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 9:50 PM Jarek Potiuk > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Good observation Jens Last time (RC) I removed the node_modules > > > manually > > > > - > > > > > had no time to fix it, so I guess we should cancel this one and > > release > > > > the > > > > > next one. I will add a fix shortly. > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 5:49 PM Jens Scheffler > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Elad, > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks for preparing! Hope we make Edge to be published as well > > soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > For all (including edge even though not published atm) providers > > > > > > *except* FAB > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package > > > > build, > > > > > > Licenses, Signatures > > > > > > > > > > > > On FAB I saw a difference, the folder > > > > > > |src/airflow/providers/fab/www/node_modules was packages into the > > > > > > release (+21MB) which I assume is a temporary folder as being in > > > > > > .gitignore. Was not able to re-produce the same binary > (difference: > > > the > > > > > > node_modules only, all other looked good). So until clarified - > > > assume > > > > > > this needs to be cleaned, I'd -1 for FAB. I assume this is due to > > > first > > > > > > "real" release with the changed structures.| > > > > > > > > > > > > |Jens > > > > > > | > > > > > > > > > > > > On 06.04.25 11:02, Elad Kalif wrote: > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This > > email > > > > is > > > > > > > calling a vote on the release, > > > > > > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on > > > April > > > > > 09, > > > > > > > 2025 09:00 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been > > received. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Provider edge was not cut due tohttps:// > > > > > > github.com/pypi/support/issues/5829 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers--*.tar.gz* are the binary > > > > > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for > > the > > > > > > Provider > > > > > > > distributions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_-*.whl are the binary > > > > > > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test > > this > > > > RC > > > > > is > > > > > > > described in: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the > > > community > > > > > are > > > > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 06, 2025
common.messaging and fab are excluded from this vote On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 9:22 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding. > > Tested my changes which primarily lied in these buckets: > > CI / static check fixes: > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48671 > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48666 > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48808 > > Actual changes > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48826 > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46231 > - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48683 > > Ran this as well as a couple of test dags and all seem to work as expected. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 7:54 AM Vishnu Chilukoori < > vish.chiluko...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 non-binding > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Vishnu. Chilukoori > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 12:02 PM Pankaj Koti > > wrote: > > > > > +1 non-binding > > > > > > Tested my PR in the Databricks provider, it's included in the RC and > the > > > changes run as expected. Thanks for the release efforts! > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 9:50 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > > > > Good observation Jens Last time (RC) I removed the node_modules > > manually > > > - > > > > had no time to fix it, so I guess we should cancel this one and > release > > > the > > > > next one. I will add a fix shortly. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 5:49 PM Jens Scheffler > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Elad, > > > > > > > > > > thanks for preparing! Hope we make Edge to be published as well > soon. > > > > > > > > > > For all (including edge even though not published atm) providers > > > > > *except* FAB > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package > > > build, > > > > > Licenses, Signatures > > > > > > > > > > On FAB I saw a difference, the folder > > > > > |src/airflow/providers/fab/www/node_modules was packages into the > > > > > release (+21MB) which I assume is a temporary folder as being in > > > > > .gitignore. Was not able to re-produce the same binary (difference: > > the > > > > > node_modules only, all other looked good). So until clarified - > > assume > > > > > this needs to be cleaned, I'd -1 for FAB. I assume this is due to > > first > > > > > "real" release with the changed structures.| > > > > > > > > > > |Jens > > > > > | > > > > > > > > > > On 06.04.25 11:02, Elad Kalif wrote: > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This > email > > > is > > > > > > calling a vote on the release, > > > > > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on > > April > > > > 09, > > > > > > 2025 09:00 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been > received. > > > > > > > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > > > > > > > Provider edge was not cut due tohttps:// > > > > > github.com/pypi/support/issues/5829 > > > > > > > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > > > > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers--*.tar.gz* are the binary > > > > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for > the > > > > > Provider > > > > > > distributions. > > > > > > > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_-*.whl are the binary > > > > > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > > > > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test > this > > > RC > > > > is > > > > > > described in: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the > > community > > > > are > > > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > > > > > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept > here: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/48842 > > > > > > > > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included > in > > > the > > > > RC > > > > > > candidates. > > > > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > > > > > documentation > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 06, 2025
+1 non binding. Tested my changes which primarily lied in these buckets: CI / static check fixes: - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48671 - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48666 - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48808 Actual changes - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48826 - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46231 - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48683 Ran this as well as a couple of test dags and all seem to work as expected. Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 7:54 AM Vishnu Chilukoori wrote: > +1 non-binding > > -- > Regards, > Vishnu. Chilukoori > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 12:02 PM Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > +1 non-binding > > > > Tested my PR in the Databricks provider, it's included in the RC and the > > changes run as expected. Thanks for the release efforts! > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 9:50 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > > Good observation Jens Last time (RC) I removed the node_modules > manually > > - > > > had no time to fix it, so I guess we should cancel this one and release > > the > > > next one. I will add a fix shortly. > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 5:49 PM Jens Scheffler > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Elad, > > > > > > > > thanks for preparing! Hope we make Edge to be published as well soon. > > > > > > > > For all (including edge even though not published atm) providers > > > > *except* FAB > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package > > build, > > > > Licenses, Signatures > > > > > > > > On FAB I saw a difference, the folder > > > > |src/airflow/providers/fab/www/node_modules was packages into the > > > > release (+21MB) which I assume is a temporary folder as being in > > > > .gitignore. Was not able to re-produce the same binary (difference: > the > > > > node_modules only, all other looked good). So until clarified - > assume > > > > this needs to be cleaned, I'd -1 for FAB. I assume this is due to > first > > > > "real" release with the changed structures.| > > > > > > > > |Jens > > > > | > > > > > > > > On 06.04.25 11:02, Elad Kalif wrote: > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email > > is > > > > > calling a vote on the release, > > > > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on > April > > > 09, > > > > > 2025 09:00 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. > > > > > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > > > > > Provider edge was not cut due tohttps:// > > > > github.com/pypi/support/issues/5829 > > > > > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers--*.tar.gz* are the binary > > > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > > > > Provider > > > > > distributions. > > > > > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_-*.whl are the binary > > > > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this > > RC > > > is > > > > > described in: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the > community > > > are > > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > > > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/48842 > > > > > > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in > > the > > > RC > > > > > candidates. > > > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > > > > documentation > > > > > after the > > > > > RC candidates are released. > > > > > > > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > > > > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-alibaba/3.0.2rc1/ > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.5.0rc3/ > > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/9.0.5rc1/ > > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-pr
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 06, 2025
+1 non-binding -- Regards, Vishnu. Chilukoori On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 12:02 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 non-binding > > Tested my PR in the Databricks provider, it's included in the RC and the > changes run as expected. Thanks for the release efforts! > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 9:50 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > Good observation Jens Last time (RC) I removed the node_modules manually > - > > had no time to fix it, so I guess we should cancel this one and release > the > > next one. I will add a fix shortly. > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 5:49 PM Jens Scheffler > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Elad, > > > > > > thanks for preparing! Hope we make Edge to be published as well soon. > > > > > > For all (including edge even though not published atm) providers > > > *except* FAB > > > > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package > build, > > > Licenses, Signatures > > > > > > On FAB I saw a difference, the folder > > > |src/airflow/providers/fab/www/node_modules was packages into the > > > release (+21MB) which I assume is a temporary folder as being in > > > .gitignore. Was not able to re-produce the same binary (difference: the > > > node_modules only, all other looked good). So until clarified - assume > > > this needs to be cleaned, I'd -1 for FAB. I assume this is due to first > > > "real" release with the changed structures.| > > > > > > |Jens > > > | > > > > > > On 06.04.25 11:02, Elad Kalif wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email > is > > > > calling a vote on the release, > > > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on April > > 09, > > > > 2025 09:00 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. > > > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > > > Provider edge was not cut due tohttps:// > > > github.com/pypi/support/issues/5829 > > > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers--*.tar.gz* are the binary > > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > > > Provider > > > > distributions. > > > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_-*.whl are the binary > > > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this > RC > > is > > > > described in: > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community > > are > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/48842 > > > > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in > the > > RC > > > > candidates. > > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > > > documentation > > > > after the > > > > RC candidates are released. > > > > > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-alibaba/3.0.2rc1/ > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.5.0rc3/ > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/9.0.5rc1/ > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy/4.3.0rc1/ > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.10.5rc1/ > > > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/10.4.1rc1/ > > > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.0rc1/ > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.25.0rc1/ > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/7.3.0rc1/ > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/4.3.2rc1/ > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-exasol/4.7.4rc1/ > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.0.0rc3/ > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/15.0.0rc1/ > > > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-mic
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 06, 2025
+1 non-binding Tested my PR in the Databricks provider, it's included in the RC and the changes run as expected. Thanks for the release efforts! On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 9:50 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Good observation Jens Last time (RC) I removed the node_modules manually - > had no time to fix it, so I guess we should cancel this one and release the > next one. I will add a fix shortly. > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 5:49 PM Jens Scheffler > wrote: > > > Hi Elad, > > > > thanks for preparing! Hope we make Edge to be published as well soon. > > > > For all (including edge even though not published atm) providers > > *except* FAB > > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build, > > Licenses, Signatures > > > > On FAB I saw a difference, the folder > > |src/airflow/providers/fab/www/node_modules was packages into the > > release (+21MB) which I assume is a temporary folder as being in > > .gitignore. Was not able to re-produce the same binary (difference: the > > node_modules only, all other looked good). So until clarified - assume > > this needs to be cleaned, I'd -1 for FAB. I assume this is due to first > > "real" release with the changed structures.| > > > > |Jens > > | > > > > On 06.04.25 11:02, Elad Kalif wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > > > calling a vote on the release, > > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on April > 09, > > > 2025 09:00 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > Provider edge was not cut due tohttps:// > > github.com/pypi/support/issues/5829 > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers--*.tar.gz* are the binary > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > > Provider > > > distributions. > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_-*.whl are the binary > > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC > is > > > described in: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community > are > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/48842 > > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the > RC > > > candidates. > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > > documentation > > > after the > > > RC candidates are released. > > > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-alibaba/3.0.2rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.5.0rc3/ > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/9.0.5rc1/ > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy/4.3.0rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.10.5rc1/ > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/10.4.1rc1/ > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.0rc1/ > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.25.0rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/7.3.0rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/4.3.2rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-exasol/4.7.4rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.0.0rc3/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/15.0.0rc1/ > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/12.3.0rc1/ > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql/4.2.2rc1/ > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/2.1.2rc2/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-papermill/3.10.0rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/6.1.2rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apa
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 06, 2025
Good observation Jens Last time (RC) I removed the node_modules manually - had no time to fix it, so I guess we should cancel this one and release the next one. I will add a fix shortly. On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 5:49 PM Jens Scheffler wrote: > Hi Elad, > > thanks for preparing! Hope we make Edge to be published as well soon. > > For all (including edge even though not published atm) providers > *except* FAB > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build, > Licenses, Signatures > > On FAB I saw a difference, the folder > |src/airflow/providers/fab/www/node_modules was packages into the > release (+21MB) which I assume is a temporary folder as being in > .gitignore. Was not able to re-produce the same binary (difference: the > node_modules only, all other looked good). So until clarified - assume > this needs to be cleaned, I'd -1 for FAB. I assume this is due to first > "real" release with the changed structures.| > > |Jens > | > > On 06.04.25 11:02, Elad Kalif wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > > calling a vote on the release, > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on April 09, > > 2025 09:00 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > Provider edge was not cut due tohttps:// > github.com/pypi/support/issues/5829 > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > *apache-airflow-providers--*.tar.gz* are the binary > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > Provider > > distributions. > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_-*.whl are the binary > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is > > described in: > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/48842 > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC > > candidates. > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > documentation > > after the > > RC candidates are released. > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-alibaba/3.0.2rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.5.0rc3/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/9.0.5rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy/4.3.0rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.10.5rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/10.4.1rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.0rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.25.0rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/7.3.0rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/4.3.2rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-exasol/4.7.4rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.0.0rc3/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/15.0.0rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/12.3.0rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql/4.2.2rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/2.1.2rc2/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-papermill/3.10.0rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/6.1.2rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-sftp/5.1.2rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.2.0rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/0.3.0rc2/ > > > > Cheers, > > Elad Kalif > > >
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 06, 2025
Hi Elad, thanks for preparing! Hope we make Edge to be published as well soon. For all (including edge even though not published atm) providers *except* FAB +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build, Licenses, Signatures On FAB I saw a difference, the folder |src/airflow/providers/fab/www/node_modules was packages into the release (+21MB) which I assume is a temporary folder as being in .gitignore. Was not able to re-produce the same binary (difference: the node_modules only, all other looked good). So until clarified - assume this needs to be cleaned, I'd -1 for FAB. I assume this is due to first "real" release with the changed structures.| |Jens | On 06.04.25 11:02, Elad Kalif wrote: Hey all, I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on April 09, 2025 09:00 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. Consider this my (binding) +1. Provider edge was not cut due tohttps://github.com/pypi/support/issues/5829 Airflow Providers are available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ *apache-airflow-providers--*.tar.gz* are the binary Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the Provider distributions. *apache_airflow_providers_-*.whl are the binary Python "wheel" release. The test procedure for PMC members is described in https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is described in: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors Public keys are available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS Please vote accordingly: [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying the artifact checksums when we actually release. The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/48842 The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC candidates. Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation after the RC candidates are released. You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-alibaba/3.0.2rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.5.0rc3/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/9.0.5rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy/4.3.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.10.5rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/10.4.1rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.25.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/7.3.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/4.3.2rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-exasol/4.7.4rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.0.0rc3/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/15.0.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/12.3.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql/4.2.2rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/2.1.2rc2/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-papermill/3.10.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/6.1.2rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-sftp/5.1.2rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.2.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/0.3.0rc2/ Cheers, Elad Kalif
[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 06, 2025
Hey all, I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on April 09, 2025 09:00 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. Consider this my (binding) +1. Provider edge was not cut due to https://github.com/pypi/support/issues/5829 Airflow Providers are available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ *apache-airflow-providers--*.tar.gz* are the binary Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the Provider distributions. *apache_airflow_providers_-*.whl are the binary Python "wheel" release. The test procedure for PMC members is described in https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is described in: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors Public keys are available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS Please vote accordingly: [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying the artifact checksums when we actually release. The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/48842 The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC candidates. Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation after the RC candidates are released. You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-alibaba/3.0.2rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.5.0rc3/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/9.0.5rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy/4.3.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.10.5rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/10.4.1rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.25.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/7.3.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/4.3.2rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-exasol/4.7.4rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.0.0rc3/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/15.0.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/12.3.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql/4.2.2rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/2.1.2rc2/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-papermill/3.10.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/6.1.2rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-sftp/5.1.2rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.2.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/0.3.0rc2/ Cheers, Elad Kalif
