On 29/04/11 00:37, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
> is directly under /.
>
> By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
> existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
> http:/
W dniu 29 kwietnia 2011 04:09 użytkownik Jasper Boot
napisał:
> Hi,
> 2011/4/29 Michał Piotrowski
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
>> existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
>> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 06:57:53AM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:59:09 +0200, Reindl Harald
> > said:
>
> RH> Am 28.04.2011 01:17, schrieb Itamar Reis Peixoto:
> >> why ipv6 and ipv4 have different name for the tools ?
> ...
> RH> because the same hostname can hav
On 4/28/2011 13:25, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> EPEL now has a 'Package Review' component in bugzilla. If you've got an
> EPEL-only package you'd like to get reviewed, feel free to file it there.
How is this any different, given that process-git-requests creates a
rawhide branch without regard to wh
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 23:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:37:26AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
> > existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
> > http://www.pathname.com/
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:37:26AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
> existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#PURPOSE16A
> but "The methodology used to na
Once upon a time, Wes Hardaker said:
> I'm all for a single unified set of commands (-4, -6). The real
> question, is what should the default be? And if 4 now, when do you
> switch later? [thus, I think -both now with v6 first if a is
> available otherwise v4 is probably the right answer]
Hello, all. A brief bio on me:
I started using Red Hat Linux in college in 1997. I spent half a decade
as a Linux sys admin, and long ago I used to lurk in #redhat and #fedora
giving tech support to new users. I first met some of these fine Fedora
folks at FUDCon 2005. I finally signed up to b
Hello,
I've been a Fedora user since FC6 and a little RH6 before that. Our
family pretty much uses Fedora exclusively, including my desktop,
MythTV box, and wife's laptop. The wife's laptop can still dual boot
Vista, but she never uses it.
I've been lurking on the devel mailing list for a while b
Hi,
I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
is directly under /.
By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#PURPOSE16A
but "The
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 23:47 +0200, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> Creating 64bit images with an additional 32bit glibc just for yaboot is
> suboptimal, but seems to work so far.
Why does yaboot use glibc? Isn't it built with -nostdlib? The issue was
libextfs.a, wasn't it? And didn't we solve that somehow?
Am 28.04.2011 20:24, schrieb David Woodhouse:
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 13:36 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>
>> Additional items to cover are:
>>
>> 1) Are ppc32 machines supported? Specifically I'm thinking of Apple
>> G4 machines, but we used to build a bunch of Freescale device drivers
>> and suc
Just as a FYI:
EPEL now has a 'Package Review' component in bugzilla. If you've got an
EPEL-only package you'd like to get reviewed, feel free to file it there.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 02:05:29PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Hrm, that's not ideal, the kernel history never got converted, so the
> > only way to blame old changes is to reference CVS...
>
> Yeah, I seem to remember that being noted after the git conversion and
> kernel folks saying they didn
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:34:23 -0400
Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:12:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I have just taken cvs.fedoraproject.org down since the last 3
> > projects using it are moved off. ;)
> >
>
> Hrm, that's not ideal, the kernel history never got converted,
Outage: Wiki, Insight, Smolt, Wordpress, Zarafa database outage - 2011-05-04
20:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2011-05-04 20:00UTC, which will last
approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:12:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I have just taken cvs.fedoraproject.org down since the last 3 projects
> using it are moved off. ;)
>
Hrm, that's not ideal, the kernel history never got converted, so the
only way to blame old changes is to reference CVS...
Can we g
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 14:56 -0400, Phillip Lynn wrote:
> All,
The updates listed below were done on 04/27/2011. After completing
updates, the errors listed below were found. I have included all files
updated using yum. After yum updates I rebooted the system.
>
> Not sure if this is the corr
On 04/28/2011 01:36 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> 1) Are ppc32 machines supported? Specifically I'm thinking of Apple
> G4 machines, but we used to build a bunch of Freescale device drivers
> and such as well for machines in the 6xx class.
Just from a demand perspective, this summer Apple will drop sup
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 13:36 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>
> Additional items to cover are:
>
> 1) Are ppc32 machines supported? Specifically I'm thinking of Apple
> G4 machines, but we used to build a bunch of Freescale device drivers
> and such as well for machines in the 6xx class.
We should
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699569
--- Comment #16 from Iain Arnell 2011-04-28 13:55:15 EDT ---
Then since we all seem to be have an icon with 0.84-3, I agree with
Hi all,
I'd like to swap a couple of reviews. My packages:
openfst: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681976
This is the next chunk of a voice recognition stack (CMU Sphinx) I've
slowly been pushing into Fedora.
csdp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689039
This is used by
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:40:01 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:12:41 -0600, KF wrote:
>
> > I have just taken cvs.fedoraproject.org down since the last 3
> > projects using it are moved off. ;)
> >
> > I'll wait a week or so before removing it entirely. If anyone finds
> >
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699569
--- Comment #15 from gat 2011-04-28 13:42:57 EDT ---
I never had perl-Padre-0.84-2.f15 installed. I had 0.84-1 with no icon. I
u
Am 28.04.2011 19:28, schrieb Wes Hardaker:
>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:10:49 +0200, Reindl Harald
>> said:
>
> RH> you can not change after 30 years way a basic-command works
> RH> like changing default to IPv6 without producing a lot
> RH> of troubles out there, make now a unifified comm
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:12:41 -0600, KF wrote:
> I have just taken cvs.fedoraproject.org down since the last 3 projects
> using it are moved off. ;)
>
> I'll wait a week or so before removing it entirely. If anyone finds
> anything that is still trying to access it or look for resources there,
> p
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
>> > Discussions are still ongoing on how to solve the unified initrd size
>> > problem though as currently for Power6 or Power5 the new initrd is just
>> > too large to ever work, even if it would be better compressed. So we
>> > might have to go
Hi,
On 04/27/2011, Hans De Goede wrote:
>
> I'm a sponsor and I would be happy to sponsor you. But first I would like to
> see slightly more of your packaging skills / understanding of the Fedora
> packaging guidelines (I already took a quick look at your pal package). There
> are 2 ways to show
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:10:49 +0200, Reindl Harald
> said:
RH> you can not change after 30 years way a basic-command works
RH> like changing default to IPv6 without producing a lot
RH> of troubles out there, make now a unifified command
RH> with IPv4 as default and change it later to IP
Josh Boyer píše v Čt 28. 04. 2011 v 13:20 -0400:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > Hi everyone.
> >
> > Just wanted to give you all a brief heads up that Fedora on PPC as a
> > secondary arch is still alive and kicking and no dead horse!
> >
> > On a more serious note, we
Here are the latest changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines:
---
A new set of guidelines have been written for handling systemd in packages:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd
---
A new set of guidel
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> Just wanted to give you all a brief heads up that Fedora on PPC as a
> secondary arch is still alive and kicking and no dead horse!
>
> On a more serious note, we've recently been catching up to the current
> Fedora 15 package
On 04/28/2011 02:00 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> Keeping the current way will just make me (and possibly others)
>> add filters to throw away messages from AutoQA. Please be aware of
>> how much contributor time you waste by making them hope through
>> useless (because the tests have passed and no inf
# F15 Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2011-04-29
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The third (of four) F15 Final blocker review meetings will be this
Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll review proposed and
acc
On 28 April 2011 17:24, Steven Yong wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Mike McLean wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Steven Yong wrote:
>>> I use it everyday and I am a C/C++ programmer. What is the requirement for
>>> the role?
>>
>> note that tomboy is a Mono app
>>
>> https:/
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Mike McLean wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Steven Yong wrote:
>> I use it everyday and I am a C/C++ programmer. What is the requirement for
>> the role?
>
> note that tomboy is a Mono app
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_m
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Steven Yong wrote:
> I use it everyday and I am a C/C++ programmer. What is the requirement for
> the role?
note that tomboy is a Mono app
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
You can skip the stuff about adding your package sin
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 16:27 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 03:10 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Lots of things are unfortunate. This is software, after all. I regret
> > not working on this earlier, since it would probably have saved the
> > effort invested in fallback mode entirely.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2011 10:26 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> 2011/4/28 Wolfgang Denk :
>> Dear David Woodhouse,
>>
>> In message <1303997568.2912.117.ca...@macbook.infradead.org> you wrote:
>>>
>>> There's no real reason you shouldn't be able to update to the F15
>
Hi,
2011/4/28 Kevin Fenzi :
> I have just taken cvs.fedoraproject.org down since the last 3 projects
> using it are moved off. ;)
>
> I'll wait a week or so before removing it entirely. If anyone finds
> anything that is still trying to access it or look for resources there,
> please let me know a
2011/4/28 Wolfgang Denk :
> Dear David Woodhouse,
>
> In message <1303997568.2912.117.ca...@macbook.infradead.org> you wrote:
>>
>> There's no real reason you shouldn't be able to update to the F15
>> packages even without an installer, surely?
>
> Did you try it? And did it work? Normally yum wi
I have just taken cvs.fedoraproject.org down since the last 3 projects
using it are moved off. ;)
I'll wait a week or so before removing it entirely. If anyone finds
anything that is still trying to access it or look for resources there,
please let me know and we can get them moved off there.
ht
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700411
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Am 28.04.2011 15:57, schrieb Wes Hardaker:
>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:59:09 +0200, Reindl Harald
>> said:
>
> RH> Am 28.04.2011 01:17, schrieb Itamar Reis Peixoto:
>>> why ipv6 and ipv4 have different name for the tools ?
> ...
> RH> because the same hostname can have A and AAA records
>
Adam Williamson wrote:
> That's a point. How about no timeout when there's an alternative
> connection available, timeout when there isn't?
In the presence of many wireless connections, not all are equal in
regards to access to things and should be treated as such (see other
thread).
--Ben
--
commit 55eb6771f5431797e93e0fa64c52e33f541c7e24
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Apr 28 15:58:21 2011 +0200
Version 56 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec | 14 +-
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletio
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 15:47 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Did you try it? And did it work? Normally yum will refuse to update
> when you try skipping more than a single version.
Define 'refuse'. It doesn't even *know*, generally.
I *often* update by two releases at a time. Sometimes more.
--
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:59:09 +0200, Reindl Harald
> said:
RH> Am 28.04.2011 01:17, schrieb Itamar Reis Peixoto:
>> why ipv6 and ipv4 have different name for the tools ?
...
RH> because the same hostname can have A and AAA records
That argument makes sense up until the point that you r
On Thursday, April 28, 2011 08:32:48 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 15:31 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > Due to these installer problems we're probably not going to be able to
> > > have an official PowerPC release for Fedora 15, but the goal is to
> > > definitely get it done
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:32 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 15:31 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> > Due to these installer problems we're probably not going to be able to
>> > have an official PowerPC release for Fedora 15, but the goal is to
>> > definitely get it done for Fedo
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 15:31 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Due to these installer problems we're probably not going to be able to
> > have an official PowerPC release for Fedora 15, but the goal is to
> > definitely get it done for Fedora 16.
>
> Am I interpreting this right that this effctivel
Hi everyone.
Just wanted to give you all a brief heads up that Fedora on PPC as a
secondary arch is still alive and kicking and no dead horse!
On a more serious note, we've recently been catching up to the current
Fedora 15 packages after PowerPC moved to secondary arch status after
Fedora 12.
In a move that will surprise few, I'm retiring hal-info in devel and
orphaned it in f15. If hal gets blocked for f16, then I'll do the same
for hal-info.
The only thing that requires hal-info is hal, and libmtp-hal.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 23:57 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 02:59:09AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> because the same hostname can have A and AAA records
> >> and the people commonly use ping (sysadmins) must be
> >> able to
On 04/27/2011 11:57 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 02:59:09AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
because the same hostname can have A and AAA records
and the people commonly use ping (sysadmins) must be
able to decide what they will test?
U
Compose started at Thu Apr 28 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal-storage.so.1()(64bit)
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit)
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x8
commit 4514e5169d32d6519cb446b98fd417c49806e1b3
Merge: b29a41d 1c07426
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Thu Apr 28 10:49:38 2011 +0200
Merge.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Convert-Color.spec | 14 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9
Summary of changes:
2f0b512... Import. (*)
e7e598e... - Add Convert-Color-0.07.diff (Remove comment, confusing rp (*)
30c78e0... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
1c07426... Upstream update. Spec cleanup. (*)
4514e51... Merge.
(*) This commit already existe
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:35:11PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> Not yet ... the VM has to provide proper 3D acceleration for it to work.
> Ajax has been working on making it run on software rendering, once his
> work is finished it should be able to run in VMs.
For what it's worth, 3D support is a plan
> Keeping the current way will just make me (and possibly others) add
> filters to throw away messages from AutoQA. Please be aware of how
> much
> contributor time you waste by making them hope through useless
> (because
> the tests have passed and no information is gained) mails. I realize
> you
Am 28.04.2011 03:38, schrieb Chuck Anderson:
> Do you propose we add telnet6, ftp6, ssh6, etc commands?
for ftp/ssh it is not relevant what protocol
who is using ping?
network-admins
for what is ping used?
to see if a connection works
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
61 matches
Mail list logo
