There will be an outage starting at 2011-05-09 15:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2011-05-09 15:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
This week there was an outage of the f
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 23:27 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> > In fact, you can see this has already happened:
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glibc-2.13.90-11
> >
> > has -6 karma at present. When it hit -3, it got unpushed.
>
> Yeah, but -1
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> In fact, you can see this has already happened:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glibc-2.13.90-11
>
> has -6 karma at present. When it hit -3, it got unpushed.
Yeah, but -10 had the drop of RPC, so the damage is already done. -10
was broke (
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 19:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adam Williamson writes:
> > sounds like a perfectly good reason to file negative karma on the
> > 'revised' update, then. Really - if you think the update is causing
> > significant problems, file negative karma, raise a stink about it. We
> > d
Adam Williamson writes:
> sounds like a perfectly good reason to file negative karma on the
> 'revised' update, then. Really - if you think the update is causing
> significant problems, file negative karma, raise a stink about it. We
> don't have to accept the update.
Done, but given that the gli
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 19:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adam Williamson writes:
> > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 10:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Well, if they think this is their beta test period, it still merits
> >> asking why the heck this type of change is going in now. I agree with
> >> Dave that th
Compose started at Fri May 6 13:15:28 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
cpm-0.23-0.3.beta.fc12.x86_64 requires libdotconf-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0
dh-make-0.
Adam Williamson writes:
> On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 10:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, if they think this is their beta test period, it still merits
>> asking why the heck this type of change is going in now. I agree with
>> Dave that this looks like development material, not near-release bug
>> f
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 10:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, if they think this is their beta test period, it still merits
> asking why the heck this type of change is going in now. I agree with
> Dave that this looks like development material, not near-release bug
> fixing. It's particularly bad
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 09:03, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Any plans for a gui replacement for gnome-schedule?
>
It doesn't appear to be abandoned:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-schedule/log/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 08:58, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Gnome 3 is a usability disaster. It added some useful things, yes,
> but it also REMOVED some useful things - what a hell!?
> Since when is that a valid development practice?
> Do we hate our users or what?
>
If you have some constructive fee
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 15:03 +1000, Roy Rankin wrote:
> Today gpsim 0.26.1 has been released. It has been built for Fedora in
> rawhide and F15. The F15 build is currently in testing and unless I get
> negative feedback will be pushed to F15 early next week making it
> available on release of F15
On 05/05/2011 03:24 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
> Having just signed the new FPCA, I'm wondering if there is any
> boilerplate for specifically licensing spec files. Is there a quick
> and easy way to state, for example: "this spec file is licensed under
> the same terms as the package itself"?
That se
Having used it for a while, I find it more than adequate. Currently
F15 is blighted by some undiagnosed crashes for me (Bug 697157) but
Gnome 3 just isn't a problem.
There are some odd things that can be worked around, but the overall
way of working is good. I found myself dragging a Windows XP wi
Outage: pkgs.fedoraproject.org - 2011-05-10 17:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2011-05-10 17:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2011-05-10 17:00 UTC'
Re
On 05/06/2011 09:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It doesn't integrate into GNOME 3 any more, since it relies on a panel
> applet and GNOME 3 doesn't support those.
The panel applet has been disabled for a long time already and it can
run standalone just fine.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
On 05/06/2011 08:58 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Gnome 3 is a usability disaster. It added some useful things, yes,
but it also REMOVED some useful things - what a hell!?
Since when is that a valid development practice?
Do we hate our users or what?
While Gnome 3 is a complete rewrite of the usabi
Package perl-SOAP-Lite in Fedora 14 has been unretired by toshio and is now
orphan.
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-SOAP-Lite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 15:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/01/2011 09:57 AM, Steven Yong wrote:
> > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> >> Just use Gnote. It being in C++ you can even maintain it for Fedora.
> >>
> > Is Gnote orphaned now too?
>
> No. I just pushed a new
Josh Boyer writes:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> No the question is what do the glibc maintainers think they are doing
>> introducing changes like this in a branched release. This sort of stuff
>> should be in rawhide.
>>
>> These guys are in no way useful at helping c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571192
--- Comment #18 from Petr Sabata 2011-05-06 10:15:01 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #16)
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticke
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571192
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System
2011-05-06 10:13:54 EDT ---
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-3.fc14 has been submitted as an upda
Summary of changes:
74db7e0... 649372 add missing requirement LWP::UserAgent (*)
352ad10... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
7ef3be6... 0.712 bump (*)
a35bc2b... Fix Requires typo (*)
04bf135... BuildArch: noarch, rhbz#694559 (*)
(*) This commit already ex
On 06/05/11 14:58, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> Gnome 3 is a usability disaster. It added some useful things, yes,
> but it also REMOVED some useful things - what a hell!?
> Since when is that a valid development practice?
> Do we hate our users or what?
>
Any plans for a gui replacement for gnome-s
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 11:05 +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made some noises on IRC about people upgrading to F15 (like myself)
> who would all come across the same surprises and would have to find a
> way to work around them. I suggested it might help to publish
> something like release n
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 10:52 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>> On Thu, 05 May 2011 15:39:21 +0200
>> Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>> > Reported as http://bugzilla.redhat.com/702366
>> > and http://bugzilla.redhat.com/702354
>>
>> Well, here's NEWS:
>>
>>
I made a mistake yesterday, and pushed PackageKit-0.6.14-1 without
doing all the self checks. This build broke getting the updates list
which is kind of a bad thing for a package manager... I've built
PackageKit-0.6.14-2 to fix the issue and pushed it to
f15-updates-testing and rawhide. The broken
Compose started at Fri May 6 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal-storage.so.1()(64bit)
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit)
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x8
Greetings testers,
Final TC1 was online at the beginning of this week, and validation tests
were under executing during the week. It's exciting to see that less and
less issues were identified from previous candidates to the current,
hereby the test results were summarized as below:
**
Hi folks,
Just a quick reminder that the nomination period for this election
cycle will open on 7 May 2011, and will close promptly on 15 May 2011
at 23:59:59 UTC.
This election cycle will fill 3 seats for the Board, and prior to the
election the FPL will announce the first of two appointed seat
30 matches
Mail list logo
