Kevin Kofler wrote:
> The "heaps" of users do not install Fedora the day of the release.
> Only very few very enthousiastic and very impatient early adopters do that
> (and I blame them for needlessly swamping our mirrors).
If they are so very few, how can they swamp a couple hundred big FTP archi
Adam Williamson wrote:
> # There must be no known remote code execution vulnerability which could
> be exploited during installation or during use of a live image shipped
> with the release
If the installer would download packages during the installation, and an
attacker could trick it into downl
On 20/05/11 19:06, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011 17:21:28 +0100, PGR wrote:
>
>> Yep. Excellent points. To be fair I was never expecting anyone to run it
>> as I thought there was a syntax error.
>
> There's at least one syntax error in the main %files section:
>
> %(_datadir}/
Hello!
I don't use eventlog directly or indirectly anymore, so I have very
little motivation to spend my time on it. I decided to release my
ownership of the EPEL branches. Fortunately other co-maintainers are
very active so it won't be abandoned completely.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
On Fri, 20 May 2011 17:21:28 +0100, PGR wrote:
> Yep. Excellent points. To be fair I was never expecting anyone to run it
> as I thought there was a syntax error.
There's at least one syntax error in the main %files section:
%(_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas/org.gtkpod.gschema.xml
^
(!)
Could
> On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:46:36 +0100, PGR wrote:
>
>> > It doesn't even build (in Plague dist-f15 buildroot) due to missing
>> > BuildRequires,
>> >
>> > checking for LIBGLADE... no
>> > configure: error: in `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtkpod-2.0.0':
>> > configure: error: *** No package 'libglad
On 5/20/11 8:17 AM, Petr Sabata wrote:
> #1, aka the Gentoo way
> Gentoo installs its 9base package into /usr/plan9, basically not touching
> 9base files at all. This collides with FHS and therefore would require an
> exception in Packaging Guidelines.
>
> #2, aka the Debi
On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:46:36 +0100, PGR wrote:
> > It doesn't even build (in Plague dist-f15 buildroot) due to missing
> > BuildRequires,
> >
> > checking for LIBGLADE... no
> > configure: error: in `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtkpod-2.0.0':
> > configure: error: *** No package 'libglade-2.0' fou
On 05/20/2011 09:21 AM, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> I can take
>
> cfitsio
Thanks. I've added myself to cfitsio as well since some of my packages depend
on it.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mi
I can take
cfitsio
hpic
2011/5/20 Truch, Matthew :
> I need to orphan all of my packages. In most cases, it would be great if
> someone (or more) could pick them up. Let me know if you'd like any of them
> and I'll release them to you.
>
> cfitsio -- Library for manipulating FITS data files Alr
Many thanks for having a look. See comments below.
Cheers
phantomjinx
> On Thu, 19 May 2011 22:34:53 +0100, P wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Would someone mind casting an eye over the attached spec file, please?
>
> It doesn't even build (in Plague dist-f15 buildroot) due to missing
> BuildRequires,
>
>
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:51:20 -0400,
"Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
> On 05/20/2011 05:35 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
> > kernel-2.6.39-0.fc16
> >
> > * Thu May 19 2011 Dave Jones
> > - Update to 2.6.39 final.
> >
> > * Sat May 14 2011 Kyle McMartin
> > - Update to v2 of Mel Gorm
On 05/20/2011 05:35 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
> kernel-2.6.39-0.fc16
>
> * Thu May 19 2011 Dave Jones
> - Update to 2.6.39 final.
>
> * Sat May 14 2011 Kyle McMartin
> - Update to v2 of Mel Gorman's SLUB patchset
>
Above didn't update installed 2.6.39-0.rc7.git6.1.fc16.x86_64.
I need to orphan all of my packages. In most cases, it would be great if
someone (or more) could pick them up. Let me know if you'd like any of them
and I'll release them to you.
cfitsio -- Library for manipulating FITS data files Already has
co-maintainers; perhaps they want to step up?
getdat
Hi list,
I've been thinking about packaging 9base [1], a port of Plan 9 userspace tools,
for Fedora. I'm interested in opinions on what style is "better" and why.
The problem is most of 9base binaries (and their manpages) have the same
name as their coreutils (and other) equivalents, therefore w
3083146 build (dist-f14-updates-candidate,
/uncrustify:6a8dd0eea2183240177154f27c10a730f20994eb) completed successfully
Creating a new update for uncrustify-0.58-1.fc14
ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/save, 200, Error returned
from json module while processing https://admin.fe
On 05/20/2011 12:00 AM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2011 14:59:57 +0200
Lennart Poettering wrote:
I am sorry that reality bothers you so much, but it is the hard old real
world ...
See, I am so young, I still have the idealism that we can fix what is
broken.
And you're going to go abo
Compose started at Fri May 20 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal-storage.so.1()(64bit)
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 03:56:58PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Josh Stone (jist...@redhat.com) said:
> > > Anyway, if kmsg msgs are lost for you this probably happens inside of
> > > ply or something related, but not systemd.
> >
> > Is "ply" part of (or short for) plymouth? I took rhgb out
On Thu, 19 May 2011 22:34:53 +0100, P wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would someone mind casting an eye over the attached spec file, please?
It doesn't even build (in Plague dist-f15 buildroot) due to missing
BuildRequires,
checking for LIBGLADE... no
configure: error: in `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtkpod-2.0
On 05/20/2011 06:00 AM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> And you're going to go about it by removing something that people have
> been using for many years, replacing it with a vague promise of a
> better solution.
The ability to run programs before shutdown has not been removed.
Looks like you missed all t
21 matches
Mail list logo