Summary of changes:
6e71da2... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
817c1d9... New upstream version (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel m
07.06.2011, 06:30, "Andrew Victor" ;:
> hi,
>> I intend to release Pidgin 2.8.0 on 2011-05-08, so I'm asking that all
>> translations be submitted before 23:59:59 US EDT on 2011-05-07 (that leaves
>> approximately 6 days for translations!) Any translations submitted after
>> this
>> dead
On 2011-06-06 11:17, Tom Callaway wrote:
> As usual, I will swap reviews or favors (within limits) for reviews on
> some new packages for me:
>
> mono-reflection:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711181
>
> pyrit:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894
>
> gambas3:
> http
Le 07/06/2011 02:19, Lucélio Gomes de Freitas a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Reindl Harald,
Em 06-06-2011 20:12, Reindl Harald escreveu:
>
>
> Am 07.06.2011 01:17, schrieb Lucélio Gomes de Freitas:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Trying to Install Mozilla-Lightning on Fedor
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 02:34:40PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 05:52 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> > Anyway, I'll tell Jeremy he'll need to manually remove/update.
>
> In my opinion this is a good (or bad?) example how users' life is made
> harder due to irrational fear of the Epoc
Hola Fedora developers, My name is Ryan! Currently i'm a PhD student in
computer science theory at dartmouth college. I'm a campus ambassador at
dartmouth college. My research interests are in computational & applied
topology for a brief introduction to field:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topologi
PLEASE DO NOT POST IN HTML AND NEVER CONVERT PLAIN-MAILS
OF A MAILING-LIST TO HTML
what client make such a ugly conversion?
Am 07.06.2011 02:19, schrieb Lucélio Gomes de Freitas:
>
> Hi Reindl Harald,
>
> Em 06-06-2011 20:12, Reindl Harald escreveu:
>
>
>> Am 07.06.2011 01:17, schrieb Lucélio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Reindl Harald,
Em 06-06-2011 20:12, Reindl Harald escreveu:
>
>
> Am 07.06.2011 01:17, schrieb Lucélio Gomes de Freitas:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Trying to Install Mozilla-Lightning on Fedora 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.x86_64
>> and got the message:
>>
>> "lightn
Am 07.06.2011 01:17, schrieb Lucélio Gomes de Freitas:
>
> Hi,
>
> Trying to Install Mozilla-Lightning on Fedora 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.x86_64
> and got the message:
>
> "lightning" could not be installed because it is not compatible with
> your thunderbird build type (
> linux_x86_64-*gcc3*). plea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Trying to Install Mozilla-Lightning on Fedora 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.x86_64
and got the message:
"lightning" could not be installed because it is not compatible with
your thunderbird build type (
linux_x86_64-*gcc3*). please contact the author of t
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 02:20:56PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> The response thus far seems to be somewhat net negative, but it seems to
> me that most of the negative feedback is also coming from people who
> haven't been using bash-completion for a while.
FWIW, it's always the default on _my_ in
On 06/02/2011 05:04 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Things like bash completion have massive performance implications on network
> and other slower file systems esp if its used for home directories.
Forgot to reply to this earlier, but I'd like to hear more details about
this, preferably in a bug rep
On 06/05/2011 03:46 PM, Alexander Boström wrote:
> Consider a hypothetical bash-uncompletion which just blacklists tab
> completion in those cases where it doesn't make sense but never adds any
> new completion sources.
I've suggested that to bash-completion earlier this year; the idea
hasn't tak
As usual, I will swap reviews or favors (within limits) for reviews on
some new packages for me:
mono-reflection:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711181
pyrit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894
gambas3:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203
As soon as I
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:51 AM, wrote:
> On , Amit Saha wrote:
>> Hello:
>>
>>
>>
>> As an effort to avoid installing the same packages (like latex, emacs,
>>
>> gnuplot..) everytime I do a fresh install of a Linux distro, I decided
>>
>> to create a Fedora spin to cater the users who use Linux
On , Amit Saha wrote:
Hello:
As an effort to avoid installing the same packages (like latex, emacs,
gnuplot..) everytime I do a fresh install of a Linux distro, I decided
to create a Fedora spin to cater the users who use Linux as their main
workstation to help them in their resear
Hello:
As an effort to avoid installing the same packages (like latex, emacs,
gnuplot..) everytime I do a fresh install of a Linux distro, I decided
to create a Fedora spin to cater the users who use Linux as their main
workstation to help them in their research.
I see from [1] that a Fedora "Spi
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> ok - so i should file a bugreport to "vnstat" if i understand you right?
I think so, yes.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am 06.06.2011 17:15, schrieb Jerry James:
> 2011/6/5 Reindl Harald :
>> has anybody an idea for which package i should file a bugreport
>> for this? i guess "vnstat" is only the postman
>
> Maybe. I notice that the bad value is 16777216.00 TiB, which is 2**64
> ... on a 64-bit machine. A quick
2011/6/5 Reindl Harald :
> has anybody an idea for which package i should file a bugreport
> for this? i guess "vnstat" is only the postman
Maybe. I notice that the bad value is 16777216.00 TiB, which is 2**64
... on a 64-bit machine. A quick look through the vnstat code shows
that it is using f
Compose started at Mon Jun 6 08:15:42 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadmsslutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadminutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.x86_64
On 06/02/2011 08:28 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Maybe I'm not understanding your question correctly, but a filesystem
> is more general than LVM. You can create directories corresponding to
> your current VGs and files for your LVs, with the advantage that you
> can nest directories which you
On 06/03/2011 05:32 PM, Robert Knight wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 12:53 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>> Things have been progressing nicely and we now even have 2 mash trees
>> with install images for testing available for, one for ppc, the other
>> for ppc64:
>>
>> http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/mnt/koji
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:12:41PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.06.2011 12:57, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
> > Looking at what's currently in the @base group in comps-f16.xml.in tells
> > me that there's a *lot* of optional functionality already in it
>
> yes, it is currently too much and s
24 matches
Mail list logo
