Re: Java 7 for Fedora 16

On 09:33:51 Monday 25 July 2011 Deepak Bhole wrote: > * Bill Nottingham [2011-07-25 15:54]: > > Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said: > > > Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapted > > > to allow for more late work to occur however none of that talk has > > > tur

Re: Java 7 for Fedora 16

On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 14:00 -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote: > Hi, > > Just something I wanted to bring to attention: > > Java 7 is slated for release (after years of hassle and heated debate) > on 28 July, 2011. > I think this would be an important feature to include for the Fedora > 16 rele

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 07:24 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote: > should not be surprised that you see resistance (what new capability does NFS > get from the systemd changes for example!). reliable on-demand automounting, for a start. for which you already owe Lennart about three kegs of beer, by my calc

Re: software-design in the past and now

On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 11:18 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > first i changed the topic because it does not fit > anly longer to this thread > > Am 23.07.2011 03:41, schrieb Adam Williamson: > > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 13:38 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > >> in the past there were real developers wh

Re: thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 22:01 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > They have some valid reasons for wanting to avoid the risk of rendering > machines inoperable or insecure because something didn't start, but I > have to agree with you that the half systemd, half sysv init thing is > pretty damn fugly. Wel

Re: Java 7 for Fedora 16

> I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take > over the Feature and doing all the work if you're fine with it... Please do! The only work I've done (literally) is on the feature page, but feel free let me know if you need anything from me. >This hasn't been debated yet

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 03:07:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > What's seeming like a better option is to bump the package's Epoch > for the systemd-native release. > > Discuss. Epoch would work for this. We didn't put Epoch into the guidelines because there's a general consensus that epoch is ea

[perl-SVG-TT-Graph] Update to 0.17, clean up spec file

commit 078f58dfbfcfe2d934d1a89cbc7fc91a8b915fd3 Author: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Mon Jul 25 22:50:41 2011 +0200 Update to 0.17, clean up spec file .gitignore |1 + perl-SVG-TT-Graph.spec | 15 ++- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+

File SVG-TT-Graph-0.17.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SVG-TT-Graph: 0c6acc4bd3299f08fb7bb8c02e5d32f2 SVG-TT-Graph-0.17.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

Bill Nottingham writes: > Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: >> IOW, once I push a mysql update with native systemd support into >> rawhide, I'll be forbidden from ever rebasing mysql in F15 up to >> a newer upstream patch release. Considering that upstream issues >> bug-fix releases about once a

Re: Java 7 for Fedora 16

Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said: > Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapted to > allow for more late work to occur however none of that talk has turned into > anything solid yet. One point that bears on this is that the Feature Owners > must be willing to c

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:28:05PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. > > It's that time again for Fedora 16. > > > > New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have > >

Re: Java 7 for Fedora 16

* Bill Nottingham [2011-07-25 15:54]: > Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said: > > Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapted to > > allow for more late work to occur however none of that talk has turned into > > anything solid yet. One point that bears on this is

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: > # Note: the NEVR in trigger scripts should all be the version in > # which the package switched to systemd unit files and the comparision > # should be less than. Using <= the last version with the sysV script won't > # work for several reasons: > # 1) disttag i

Re: Java 7 for Fedora 16

* Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-25 15:18]: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote: > > * Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-23 20:03]: > > > The alpha change deadline is a week and three days away so this is very > > > likely too late. If you want to try to get an exception to get this

Re: Java 7 for Fedora 16

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote: > * Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-23 20:03]: > > The alpha change deadline is a week and three days away so this is very > > likely too late. If you want to try to get an exception to get this in, you > > need to get the Java SIG excited to

Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

In https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd I read that conversion of a package using a SysV initscript to systemd units requires a trigger with a "< NEVR" condition, and that # Note: the NEVR in trigger scripts should all be the version in # which the package switched to

Re: Meeting minutes/summary for 2011-07-25 FESCo meeting

On 07/25/2011 06:22 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > * need to get audidt #617321 iscsi #714688 NFS-Utils #699040 > Tigervnc #717227 dnsmasq #694932 openvpn #714710 speech-dispatcherd > #697600 smolt #697612 wpa_supplicant #661230 done before next > tuesday if at all possible. (niri

Re: Review Request: qodem - Qodem terminal emulator and communications package

Hi Richard, Am 25.07.2011 17:11, schrieb Richard Shaw: > Anyone have a sec to review this[1]? It should be VERY simple. > > I recently did a little bit of retro-BBS'ing and couldn't find > anything that would handle the ANSI art properly when I found qodem, > which is a pseudo-clone of the old DO

Meeting minutes/summary for 2011-07-25 FESCo meeting

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCo (2011-07-25) === Meeting started by notting at 17:01:40 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-07-25/fesco.2011-07-25-17.01.log.html . Meeting summary --

Orphaning some packages

Due to my job changing and me using some of these packages less and less, I will orphaning several packages. jabberpy -- (Fedora + EPEL) jss - (EPEL) perl-Business-CreditCard (Fedora + EPEL) perl-Frontier-RPC (EPEL) php-magpierss (Fedora + EPEL) php-spyc (Fedora + EPEL) python-pygooglechart (Fedor

merge into dist-f16

Hello list, merge was done. I'm checking mistakes between dist-f16 and dist-f16-perl, but it looks good. Sum up of previous problems: a/ can't be built with 5.14 golly (#717675) perl-MongoDB (RT #68652) perl-NOCpulse-Debug (#716369) perl-NOCpulse-Gritch (#716369) perl-NOCpulse-Object (#716369) pe

[perl-PPI-PowerToys] add new filter for rpm 4.9

commit 7c7f413e977ba57b73c1dc2d9574763fa34e1f62 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Mon Jul 25 18:28:55 2011 +0200 add new filter for rpm 4.9 perl-PPI-PowerToys.spec | 18 ++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-PPI-PowerToys.spec b/perl-PP

Agenda for July 25 FESCo meeting

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting on 2011-07-25 at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #563 suggested policy: all daem

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 20:52:47 +0100, Richard Fearn wrote: > > Orphan notecase > > I think this one is being retired due to a FTBFS, which could easily be fixed: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716193#c7 Except that being FTBFS for a long time is also a good indication that

Re: Features firewalld-default and network-zones

Hello Jaroslav, On 07/25/2011 05:04 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Monday, July 25, 2011 04:43:37 PM Thomas Woerner wrote: >> Hello, > > Hi Thomas! > >> the features firewalld-default and network-zones will be postponed for >> Fedora-17. The features are not ready yet and also the integration int

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:28:05PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. > It's that time again for Fedora 16. > > New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have > failed to build since before Fedora 14. > > The fo

[perl-PathTools] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added

commit f7fa90cc6a82dec030ba9b6f346e681207aaa7d9 Author: Petr Pisar Date: Mon Jul 25 17:43:05 2011 +0200 RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added perl-PathTools.spec | 12 +--- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-PathTools.spec b/perl-PathTools.spec i

Re: [perl-Devel-Caller] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 04:53:52PM +0200, Iain Arnell wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Petr Sabata > wrote: > > commit 18c2b80686fdfe615681f2e9657dd0d88d16b44f > > Author: Petr Pisar > > Date:   Mon Jul 25 11:27:37 2011 +0200 > > > >    RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added > > > >  perl-

Re: Java 7 for Fedora 16

* Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-23 20:03]: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 02:00:24PM -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just something I wanted to bring to attention: > > > > Java 7 is slated for release (after years of hassle and heated debate) > > on 28 July, 2011. > > I think this wou

[perl-MooseX-Types-DateTimeX] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added

commit b98ad0e4ac9251c7ef89f1e8b00a81a0cfd4aba8 Author: Petr Pisar Date: Mon Jul 25 17:16:47 2011 +0200 RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added perl-MooseX-Types-DateTimeX.spec | 11 ++- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-MooseX-Types-DateTimeX.sp

[perl-NetAddr-IP] Fix RPM 4.9 dependency filtering

commit 79a5461d34e8dd2feace0fb9456a62881074694d Author: Petr Pisar Date: Mon Jul 25 17:12:17 2011 +0200 Fix RPM 4.9 dependency filtering perl-NetAddr-IP.spec |7 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec b/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec index

Review Request: qodem - Qodem terminal emulator and communications package

Anyone have a sec to review this[1]? It should be VERY simple. I recently did a little bit of retro-BBS'ing and couldn't find anything that would handle the ANSI art properly when I found qodem, which is a pseudo-clone of the old DOS Qmodem. I'll do a review swap if needed! Thanks, Richard http

[rt3] use perl_default filter, not filter_setup

commit 8411701e7a9de939e2c0e1c953eeb651fa51555e Author: Iain Arnell Date: Mon Jul 25 17:00:47 2011 +0200 use perl_default filter, not filter_setup rt3.spec |5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/rt3.spec b/rt3.spec index f6ef9a2..14bccd9 100644 ---

Re: Features firewalld-default and network-zones

On Monday, July 25, 2011 04:43:37 PM Thomas Woerner wrote: > Hello, Hi Thomas! > the features firewalld-default and network-zones will be postponed for > Fedora-17. The features are not ready yet and also the integration into > other projects. The network zone backend in NetworkManager is making

[perl-Devel-Caller] provides_exclude needs to come after perl_default_filter

commit 3fc08e08a371c445d40cd501d90ace12c4bb4f75 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Mon Jul 25 17:02:11 2011 +0200 provides_exclude needs to come after perl_default_filter perl-Devel-Caller.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Devel-Caller.spec b

[perl-Memoize-ExpireLRU] use perl_default filter, not filter_setup

commit 047cb1dcb463ecf1d9cd5c932f7b2820bdc1c1e0 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Mon Jul 25 16:51:20 2011 +0200 use perl_default filter, not filter_setup perl-Memoize-ExpireLRU.spec |5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Memoize-ExpireLRU.spec b/perl

[perl-Module-Mask] use perl_default filter, not filter_setup

commit b0437926bf19a8f2d04d685a686216786a94ac69 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Mon Jul 25 16:58:23 2011 +0200 use perl_default filter, not filter_setup perl-Module-Mask.spec |6 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Module-Mask.spec b/perl-Module-Mas

Re: [perl-Devel-Caller] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Petr Sabata wrote: > commit 18c2b80686fdfe615681f2e9657dd0d88d16b44f > Author: Petr Pisar > Date:   Mon Jul 25 11:27:37 2011 +0200 > >    RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added > >  perl-Devel-Caller.spec |   10 -- >  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 delet

[perl-Devel-Caller] __provides_exclude needs to come after perl_default_filter

commit 0b69d602360e624fc8ebf39a0c8a1bd091c36449 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Mon Jul 25 16:49:02 2011 +0200 __provides_exclude needs to come after perl_default_filter perl-Devel-Caller.spec |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Devel-Caller.spec b/

[perl-MogileFS-Utils] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added

commit ee881d57d16876838229b1be5b40d054a63b3be6 Author: Petr Pisar Date: Mon Jul 25 16:46:06 2011 +0200 RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added perl-MogileFS-Utils.spec |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-MogileFS-Utils.spec b/perl-MogileFS-U

[rt3] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added

commit 217e6ff3555d531032946dfc78227a5cf534b177 Author: Petr Pisar Date: Mon Jul 25 16:39:02 2011 +0200 RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added rt3.spec | 25 +++-- 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/rt3.spec b/rt3.spec index e3d5d2e..f6ef9

Features firewalld-default and network-zones

Hello, the features firewalld-default and network-zones will be postponed for Fedora-17. The features are not ready yet and also the integration into other projects. The network zone backend in NetworkManager is making progress, but the front ends are not done yet. Without the front ends (nm-a

Re: Grubby and Xen

On 7/25/11 8:31 AM, Roman Rakus wrote: > On 07/25/2011 04:38 AM, W. Michael Petullo wrote: >> Is anyone who is a grubby contributor interested in adding these features >> to grubby to support the XenPvopsDom0 feature? I've provided a patch in >> bug #658387. >> > Is it possible to use augeas [1]? T

Re: Grubby and Xen

On 07/25/2011 04:38 AM, W. Michael Petullo wrote: > I have been working with a few other Fedora contributors on the Fedora 16 > feature "XenPvopsDom0", http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0. > This feature would provide a robust virtualization alternative based on > Xen. Xen is a type

Re: Fixing a FTBFS bug - unresponsive maintainer

On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 13:59 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > A provenpackager jumping in for just one FTBFS would be a short-term > solution only. I will do that for the time being. I know Xavier is quite busy have you tried to contact him directly ? Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fed

[perl-PPIx-EditorTools] add new filter

commit 5aec4ee579313e669105d4bfe459992a515273a4 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Mon Jul 25 14:03:23 2011 +0200 add new filter perl-PPIx-EditorTools.spec |6 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-PPIx-EditorTools.spec b/perl-PPIx-EditorTools.spec

[perl-PPIx-Regexp] add new filter

commit dd2c10b6e1658f16640f7e2b117914f968cae678 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Mon Jul 25 14:01:01 2011 +0200 add new filter perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec b/perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec index 92993f6

[perl-Language-Functional] RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added

commit e9a9587ab6106a56970538771a5057bff378c102 Author: Petr Pisar Date: Mon Jul 25 13:57:35 2011 +0200 RPM 4.9 dependency filtering added perl-Language-Functional.spec |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Language-Functional.spec b/perl-

[perl-Spoon] add new filter

commit dbc219c4de4cae135c4eb839c4730383669827f0 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Mon Jul 25 13:58:36 2011 +0200 add new filter perl-Spoon.spec | 10 -- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Spoon.spec b/perl-Spoon.spec index 2a7f7b1..75384ab 10064

[perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule] add new filter

commit 2d860843feba2f60e498986896007d6eda48f963 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Mon Jul 25 13:57:06 2011 +0200 add new filter perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule.spec |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule.spec b/perl-Pugs-Compiler-R

Re: Fixing a FTBFS bug - unresponsive maintainer

On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:45:34 +0200, JL (Johannes) wrote: > Hello, > > there is a pretty easy to fix FTBFS bug but the maintainer doesn't > really react on anything. > Does anyone knows how to contact him through other channels? I know that > he's present in some fedora irc channels as 'Smoother

[perl-Statistics-Basic] add new filter

commit ce87c954278119fde9eefa8efa6d6a9732a8d0bd Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Mon Jul 25 13:43:14 2011 +0200 add new filter perl-Statistics-Basic.spec |7 +++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Statistics-Basic.spec b/perl-Statistics-Basic.spe

Fixing a FTBFS bug - unresponsive maintainer

Hello, there is a pretty easy to fix FTBFS bug but the maintainer doesn't really react on anything. Does anyone knows how to contact him through other channels? I know that he's present in some fedora irc channels as 'SmootherFrOgZ' but didn't receive a reply there either. https://bugzilla.red

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

2011/7/20 Bill Nottingham : > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. > It's that time again for Fedora 16. > > New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have > failed to build since before Fedora 14. > > The following packages are currently orphaned

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. > It's that time again for Fedora 16. > > New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have > failed to build since before Fedora 14. > > The following p