Richard Shaw wrote:
> Yeah, it's a hack, but it works pretty well. Now the kernel module
> SRPM will be available as part of the build results. Anyone have a
> better idea?
Instead of trying to come up with clever hacks, please look at how existing
kernel modules are packaged in RPM Fusion. They
> Greetings from the quirky engineering school we call Olin. We three
> (Kevin,
> Ashley, and I) are getting a crash course on packaging and other release
> engineering skills from Sebastian (Sdz
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sdz)
>
> We've produced a package for the io programming languag
How should those of us with gmp-using packages manage updates while
the update to GMP 5.x is underway? I've got a handful of updates I
want to build for Rawhide at some point, but I don't want to cause
problems. Should I wait until the GMP update is done and the packages
are all tagged, or go ahe
Greetings from the quirky engineering school we call Olin. We three (Kevin,
Ashley, and I) are getting a crash course on packaging and other release
engineering skills from Sebastian (Sdz
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sdz)
We've produced a package for the io programming language.
https://bug
On 17/10/11, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 17/10/11 20:02, Alex Lancaster wrote:
>> Looking at the changelog, it isn't obvious whether this
>> introduces any ABI/API changes or not, hence this e-mail.
> I just asked Dane on IRC and he confirms that they are not compatible so
> the soname needs to be b
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:02:29 -0400 (EDT)
Alex Lancaster wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Looks like mapnik has been bumped from 0.7 to 2.0 upstream:
>
> http://mapnik.org/news/2011/sep/26/release_2_0/
>
> I am rebuilding mapnik in rawhide to fix broken deps, and I
> was wondering if any maintainers of m
Frequency scaling have negative effects for me
so I need to have it disabled in BIOS.
I think that this is not BIOS option broken
but broken kernel with built-in cpufreq modules.
If hardware supports disabling frequency scaling
then should be possibility to do this.
BIOS have such possibility, Fed
On 17/10/11 20:02, Alex Lancaster wrote:
> Looking at the changelog, it isn't obvious whether this
> introduces any ABI/API changes or not, hence this e-mail.
I just asked Dane on IRC and he confirms that they are not compatible so
the soname needs to be bumped.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compto
Hi there,
Looks like mapnik has been bumped from 0.7 to 2.0 upstream:
http://mapnik.org/news/2011/sep/26/release_2_0/
I am rebuilding mapnik in rawhide to fix broken deps, and I
was wondering if any maintainers of mapnik-dependent packages
had any opinions on whether updating to 2.0 would have a
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 09:20 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
> after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
> modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this?
>
> I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 21:54 +0300, alekc...@googlemail.com wrote:
> But this assumption was wrong for my system which have BIOS option
> for disabling CPU frequency scaling (SpeedStep).
>
> If SpeedStep is enabled in BIOS then kernel uses acpi-cpufreq built-in module
> but if I will disable frequ
Hi,
The purpose of this bug was to provide native systemd script for cpuspeed in
Fedora 16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713572
But instead of adding systemd script which should load cpufreq modules other
solution was provided - cpufreq modules was compiled as built-in in Fedora 16
Hello all,
Just going through the process noted at the wiki for becoming a package
maintainer[1], so here I am introducing myself.
A bit about me: Red Hatter, Open Source Java guy, so far have done much more
lurking than participating at least wrt Fedora.
I am for now mainly taking on the new
The version of synergy-plus currently in Fedora doesn't work well with
gnome3; I had noticed this because I couldn't get the mouse past the
menubar to an alternate screen configured to be "north", but there are
other problems as well:
http://synergy-foss.org/tracker/issues/2958
Since the sy
On 10/17/2011 01:10 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 10:20 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
>> after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
>> modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this?
>>
This is a followup to the earlier TC1 announcement
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2011-October/000309.html
when the x86_64 install images were not available yet. They are now in
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/16.TC1/Fedora/x86_64/iso/
Delta ISOs should be avai
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-17)
===
Meeting started by notting at 17:01:09 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-17/fesco.2011-10-17-17.01.log.html
Meeting summary
--
On Mon, 17.10.11 13:21, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Note that you might still need to enable
> > NetworkManager-wait-online.servce with "systemctl enable" so that bootup
> > is delayed until NM configured a network. (more precisely: delay
> > network.target until NM configured a networ
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 19:10 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 17.10.11 09:20, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote:
>
> > I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
> > after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
> > modules-load seem
On Mon, 17.10.11 09:20, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote:
> I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
> after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
> modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this?
Well, yes and no.
In general doing
On 10/17/2011 10:20 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
> after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
> modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this?
>
> I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
Ok, I've dug a little deeper and I think there needs to be two
separate packages. The reason for this is that the kernel module needs
to be rebuilt on every kernel install/update.
The current Makefile has a target to create a SRPM for the kernel
module. I think I can do something along these lines
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:27:38AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
>> technical one.
>>
>> I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
>> single so
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2011/10/17 Richard Shaw :
>> Is it technically possible to "source in" an spec from within a spec?
>
> If that really worth it, I would create a package dropping several
> macros into /etc/rpm.
> Then I could reuse them in the two different
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:27:38AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
> technical one.
>
> I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
> single source package but contains two spec files. One for the
> utilitie
2011/10/17 Richard Shaw :
> NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
> technical one.
>
> I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
> single source package but contains two spec files. One for the
> utilities (zfs{,-devel,-dracut,-test}) and on
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 09:27 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
>> technical one.
>>
>> I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
>> single source p
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 09:27 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
> technical one.
>
> I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
> single source package but contains two spec files. One for the
> utilities (zfs{
NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
technical one.
I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
single source package but contains two spec files. One for the
utilities (zfs{,-devel,-dracut,-test}) and one for the kernel module
(zfs-modules)
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 16:07:54 +0200,
Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> In fact, a package that installs rules files in /etc is almost
> definitely doing it wrong, and should be fixed.
On that note I have filed bug 744230 against apmd which tries to package
a config file in /etc/module-load whic
I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this?
I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746481 against systemd,
but it has been closed notabug.
On Mon, 17.10.11 08:34, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from
> http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both
> udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not
> find any guidelines on F
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:34:58 -0500,
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from
>> http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both
>> udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not
>> find any guidelines
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #667 Request to fix CRITPATH update proces
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:34:58 -0500,
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from
> http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both
> udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not
> find any guidelines on Fedora
Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from
http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both
udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not
find any guidelines on Fedora for what directory was appropriate.
I did find a discussion from Arch
Compose started at Mon Oct 17 08:15:23 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require
Also, FYI, you you can disable it (as alternative to deleting):
unset -f command_not_found_handle
in your .bashrc ...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 16 October 2011 19:00, JB wrote:
> pk-command-not-found [OPTION...]
We fixed this quite a long time ago. Perhaps upgrading to F15 or F16
might be a good idea?
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 11:14 -0700, darrell pfeifer wrote:
> How does grubby decide which boot loader is running?
It doesn't care. It updates any grub config it finds. If you have both
grub1 and grub2 configs present, it will update both.
>
> I have a system upgraded from grub to grub2. I've yum
40 matches
Mail list logo
