On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 04:13:37PM +0100, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 02/12/2011 alle 16.37 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi ha scritto:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:39:31PM +0100, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> > >
> > > packagedb seems an interesting project, for storing ratings and reviews,
>
Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
> - open a bz ticket to create git access for libquvi-scripts and libquvi
> in F16 (quvi already exists)
Actually, the new branch request should be filed in the existing review
ticket, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_fo
I'm writing my own cmake module for finding TinyXML and I'm trying to
extract the version from the header.
For some reason it's matching the whole file no matter what I do. I've
looked through several of the cmake modules in
/usr/share/cmake/Modules and don't see what I'm doing that's so
different
On 03/12/2011 23:26, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> At least postpone dealing with it until the anticipated problems (you
>> mentioned "problems will appear") become reality? If nothing's broken
>> at the moment, don't try to fix anything yet...
> I think there already are some fixes
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> $ echo "const int TIXML_MAJOR_VERSION = 2;" | sed 's/const int
> TIXML_MAJOR_VERSION = \([0-9]+\).*/\1/'
> const int TIXML_MAJOR_VERSION = 2;
By replacing (sed 's/../../') with (sed -n 's/../../p') you can see
that the regex doesn't match. T
Am 04.12.2011 01:18, schrieb Ralf Ertzinger:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:38:11 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote
>> is it really a good decision to restart services after update in
>> the %post section?
>
> As far as I am aware this has always been done, at least for most
> server packages, this
Hi.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:38:11 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote
> is it really a good decision to restart services after update in
> the %post section?
As far as I am aware this has always been done, at least for most
server packages, this is not a new thing.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote about gdk-pixbuf:
> > It failed the mass rebuild, not much left that depends on it, and
> > nothing I need. ;)
> [...]
>
>> So, if anyone really really really wants to keep it alive, feel free to
>> take it and fix it so it
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> At least postpone dealing with it until the anticipated problems (you
> mentioned "problems will appear") become reality? If nothing's broken
> at the moment, don't try to fix anything yet...
I think there already are some fixes of that kind, and I also don't see what
waiti
Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
> My question is : what must I do ? backport 0.4.x ? downgrade to 0.2.16 ?
> keep 0.2.19 ?
I'd go with backporting 0.4.x.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Kevin Fenzi wrote about gdk-pixbuf:
> It failed the mass rebuild, not much left that depends on it, and
> nothing I need. ;)
[...]
> So, if anyone really really really wants to keep it alive, feel free to
> take it and fix it so it builds and works. ;)
I use gdk-pixbuf in an application that
is it really a good decision to restart services after update in
the %post section?
currently my hardest work is rebuild packages without this especially
for dist-upgrades with "yum" because in this case many would fail because
they are restarted in the middle of the transaction and not all deps a
Hi,
Any reasons on why libgbm isn't being built and packaged in the
current mesa SPEC file? libgbm is a dependency for wayland-demos.
The --enable-gbm configure option depends on --enable-shared-glapi. Is
there any constraint?
-Ilyes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
commit 405a3b1cba7e7278961742dbdadb4147baa8f99d
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Sat Dec 3 11:53:07 2011 -0700
clamav and logrotate fix
dspam.spec | 11 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index f2d8d54..dac11a4 100644
Toshio Kuratomi writes:
> Sounds like this is just going to occur for RawHide, right? With that in
> mind
Right, no intention of changing unixODBC in released branches.
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:22:55PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There are a couple of ways I could go about it:
>> 1. Inclu
Hi,
I'm quvi's packager. I have a problem with F16. Here is the situation :
- F15 provides quvi (the libquvi, the scripts, and the executable file)
0.2.16.X : the "legacy" version, still maintained
- F16 provides quvi (the libquvi, the scripts, and the executable file)
0.2.19 : not maintained a
Il giorno ven, 02/12/2011 alle 16.37 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi ha scritto:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:39:31PM +0100, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> >
> > packagedb seems an interesting project, for storing ratings and reviews,
> > and it could be a candidate to replace the Ubuntu backend. Is there some
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:13:49AM +0100, drago01 wrote:
>
> I don't buy the legal problem. If we can ship the icons in the
> distribution split into multiple packages we can ship them aggregated
> into one as well.
> You can't "link" icons so the license of the icons should and cannot
> prevent o
On 12/03/2011 05:32 PM, Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
> So now, F15 and rawhide both have a maintained version, but F16 provides
> a quvi that is not maintained. Problems will appear because the websites
> handeled by libquvi often change.
[...]
> My question is : what must I do ? backport 0.4.x ? down
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 06:19:27PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Yes, and the question becomes, can we make this easier in F17?
Yes, we can do EFI installs.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
2011/12/2 Adam Williamson :
> On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 21:39 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:21:49PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > We explicitly don't support native EFI installs on Macs, at the request
>> > of the anaconda team, as Apple's EFI implementation is hideou
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:49:26PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> I just ran into this in Rawhide, and I don't have ipv6 blacklisted. But
>> still:
>>
>> [root@adam adamw]# virsh net-start default
>> error: Failed to start network default
>
why are permanently with updates introduced new hidden folders
in /etc which let alerting "rkhunter"? openjdk is only a recent
example, but happended often in the last years with several packages
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ ls -lha /etc/.java/
insgesamt 20K
drwxr-xr-x3 root root 4,0K 2011-12-01 16:2
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:39:31PM +0100, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
>>
>> packagedb seems an interesting project, for storing ratings and reviews,
>> and it could be a candidate to replace the Ubuntu backend. Is there some
>> documentation so
On 02/12/11 21:43, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Frank Murphy gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Have you tested them?
>> Have you provided feedback?
>
> Even if I did, this would not help push packages that are pending to go into
> testing.
>
> --
> Bojan
>
Still, it may help with a decision to pull, before push
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:49:26PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I just ran into this in Rawhide, and I don't have ipv6 blacklisted. But
> still:
>
> [root@adam adamw]# virsh net-start default
> error: Failed to start network default
> error: cannot create bridge 'virbr0': Package not installed
26 matches
Mail list logo
