Hi, folks. As no agenda items other than the standard catch-ups have
been proposed via the list or on the Wiki page, and we have no action
items from last week's meeting to catch up with, the 2011-12-12 meeting
is provisionally cancelled, per the meeting SOP: there's no point having
a meeting just
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> But isn't that why Fedora exists, to push everyone along :)
>
> Sounds like it needs to be in at least F18 for that timetable.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_1.9.3
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2011-September/000658.html
http://lists.fe
Adam Jackson wrote:
> 8 qt3-3.3.8b-37.fc17.src.rpm
Fixed. This was poking a round a lot in the png_info structure. Thankfully,
the NetBSD folks had already prepared a patch, which I applied in
qt3-3.3.8b-40.fc17, which built successfully in Rawhide.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:32 PM, David Howells wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How do I prevent rpmbuild from attempting to strip a particular binary? The
> problem is that the binary was cross-compiled and is not of the same
> architecture as the normal Fedora binutils. Thus the strip program used (from
> th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am 10.12.2011 01:20, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> So I'm sceptical about MATE (seeing what's going on with Trinity)
> and I can only strongly discourage attempting to package Trinity.
I agree to that point of view. IMHO MATE is a waste of time and
manpow
Hi,
How do I prevent rpmbuild from attempting to strip a particular binary? The
problem is that the binary was cross-compiled and is not of the same
architecture as the normal Fedora binutils. Thus the strip program used (from
the wrong binutils) appears to corrupt the binary.
David
--
devel
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Yes, gdk-pixbuf2 is not going away.
> gdk-pixbuf is the gtk1-era incarnation and not really used by anything
> anymore.
Whew, that's a relief!
Thanks!
Eric
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> It is not useful to generalize. There are lots of software components
> which aren't actively maintained but are useful to have in the
> distribution and all distributions have them however a desktop
> environment is a lot of work to maintain (as seen for instance in
> http:
On 12/09/2011 02:11 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
>>
>> PS: why the hell are we still shipping this crap ? Ruby 1.9.x has been
>> the stable branch for almost three years, now. Upstream has decided to
>> stop providing bugfixes for Ruby 1.8.7 by j
Le 04/12/2011 07:14, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
>> - open a bz ticket to create git access for libquvi-scripts and libquvi
>> in F16 (quvi already exists)
> Actually, the new branch request should be filed in the existing review
> ticket, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/P
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
>
> PS: why the hell are we still shipping this crap ? Ruby 1.9.x has been
> the stable branch for almost three years, now. Upstream has decided to
> stop providing bugfixes for Ruby 1.8.7 by june 2012 and CVE fixes by
> june 2013.
From what I
On 11/15/2011 03:19 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
> If there are some license issues not easy to solve, there is still a
> compat-gdbm package, which ships gdbm-1.8.3 with GPLv2+.
The problem is that compat-gdbm has no -devel package, and we cannot use
the gdbm-devel package for this.
Since Thorsten K
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:22:20 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> F16 gdb doesn't support DW_OP_entry_value and typed DWARF stack extensions
> I think, you need to wait for F17 for that.
These features are not yet in Rawhide, they are in FSF GDB HEAD, it should be
in Rawhide in a week or so.
I do not pl
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:16:42PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Are there known obstacles in the way of replacing -g with "-gdwarf-4
> -fvar-tracking-assignments" in our %{optflags}? I'm eager to be rid
> of gdb telling me that the one value I really have to know to diagnose
> a crash has been opti
Are there known obstacles in the way of replacing -g with "-gdwarf-4
-fvar-tracking-assignments" in our %{optflags}? I'm eager to be rid
of gdb telling me that the one value I really have to know to diagnose
a crash has been optimized away. Are there bits of the toolchain that
can't handle DWARF
Orion Poplawski writes:
> On 12/05/2011 05:29 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
>> Orion Poplawski writes:
>>
>>> I'm seeing the following boost related build error building paraview
>>> in rawhide. Do any boost gurus know what the issue might be the
>>> issue?
>>
>> Hi there, please do not hesitate to f
Greetings, y’all!
This release cycle I am the Test Day Coordinator. That means it is
my job to help you, my fellow Fedorians, to set up test days for your
packages/projects. We have about two and a half months until Alpha
release (1). The sooner I receive test day proposals, the easier my
Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> The compatibility report between 1.1 and 3.2.2 versions of libnl
> generated by abi-compliance-checker [1] tool (see attachment:
> abi_compat_report.html) may be of help.
>
> [1] http://forge.ispras.ru/projects/abi-compliance-checker
now back online:
*API changes/c
On 12/06/2011 12:17 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> amanith-0.3-17.fc16.src.rpm
> freewrl-1.22.12-0.3.pre2.fc17.src.rpm
> irrlicht-1.7.2-8.fc17.src.rpm
> tkimg-1.4-4.fc17.src.rpm
> xloadimage-4.1-6.fc16.src.rpm
All of these are fixed now in rawhide and properly link to -lpng15
(freewrl also required th
On 12/05/2011 05:29 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
> Orion Poplawski writes:
>
>> I'm seeing the following boost related build error building paraview
>> in rawhide. Do any boost gurus know what the issue might be the
>> issue?
>
> Hi there, please do not hesitate to file bugs for such regressions. I
>
2011/12/9 Siddhesh Poyarekar :
> Hi,
>
> I got a request to include demosaic packs into the LibRaw build to
> support some digital cameras:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760638
>
> With this inclusion, the LibRaw package will have a GPLv3+ license
> since the demosaic packs are re
commit 071b0341c8b89029f779a7ce634fc2c8d440db34
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Dec 9 15:46:17 2011 +0100
6.07 bump
.gitignore |1 +
.rpmlint |3 +++
perl-Coro.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Coro:
354dd4f058a30f085716010b771e27e9 Coro-6.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pe
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-JSON-RPC:
802d5bb488f3587f16aa69e8c002132b JSON-RPC-1.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
Greetings, y’all!
This release cycle I am the Test Day Coordinator. That means it is
my job to help you, my fellow Fedorians, to set up test days for your
packages/projects. We have about two and a half months until Alpha
release (1). The sooner I receive test day proposals, the easier my
l
hello,
Would any one want to swap reviews please? This is a rather simple
package to review :)
Review Request: indimpc - A minimalist MPD client with support for the
gnome-shell and multimedia keys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765802
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
htt
Hi,
I got a request to include demosaic packs into the LibRaw build to
support some digital cameras:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760638
With this inclusion, the LibRaw package will have a GPLv3+ license
since the demosaic packs are released under GPLv2+ and
GPLv3+. Currently only
On 12/09/2011 05:42 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 11:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
one
>> developer? I am worried about sustainability.
>>> > > How can you be worried about maintainability given that we
>>> already have
>>> > unmaintained and poorly maintained pac
Am 05.12.2011 01:32, schrieb Björn Persson:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> is it really a good decision to restart services after update in
>> the %post section?
>>
>> currently my hardest work is rebuild packages without this especially
>> for dist-upgrades with "yum" because in this case many would
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.023 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765792
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.023 is available
Product: Fedora
Long time in the making, but at long last after 6 weeks of hard work the
Fedora Secondary Arch Team for Power finally managed to get the Fedora
16 Beta release done!
Available from mirrors now here:
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/16/ppc64/
under releases/test/16-Beta/
or
On 12/09/2011 12:50 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
>> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
>> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few mon
On 12/09/2011 11:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> one
>>> >> developer? I am worried about sustainability.
>> >
>> > How can you be worried about maintainability given that we already have
>> > unmaintained and poorly maintained packages in the distribution?
> When you have problems, the solu
On 12/09/2011 05:17 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 04:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>>> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
>>> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
>
On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package the
> remaining MATE packages.
>
> Would anyo
On 12/09/2011 04:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
>> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
>> GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to pa
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> What do you think about Trinity Desktop? I liked KDE3. Is there a
> chance to include this DE in Fedora?
Please NO! We worked hard on making kdelibs3 apps work well in KDE Plasma 4
sessions. Trying to support Trinity sessions too is going to make a big
mess. Another big
On 09/12/11 07:03, Eric Smith wrote:
>
> I tried switching to Xfce, and found it to be a lot better than Gnome 3,
> but it was still missing a lot of things I'm accustomed to in Gnome 2.
>
> I'm not trying to start another advocacy thread. I'm just trying to
> package up an alternative for people
Hi,
What do you think about Trinity Desktop? I liked KDE3. Is there a
chance to include this DE in Fedora? Unlike the MATE, TD is well
maintained and there is a development community.
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2011, 19:50 -0800 schrieb Eric Smith:
> I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE
> desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of
> GNOME 2.
MATE is just replacing "gnome" with "mate" everywhere, whether or not it
w
40 matches
Mail list logo
