On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
>> 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson :
> [..]
>>> There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other
>>> modules that add support for the protocol.
>>
>> I will try tomorr
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 14:33 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> >> If you think this is a good example, I'll edit the page to fix those
>> >> issues.
>> >>
>> >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-March/163885.html
>> >
>> > I'd
W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson :
[..]
>> There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other
>> modules that add support for the protocol.
>
> I will try tomorrow - I've got mod_fcgid package sources for reference.
>
> W
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 14:33 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >> If you think this is a good example, I'll edit the page to fix those
> >> issues.
> >>
> >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-March/163885.html
> >
> > I'd probably pick one which doesn't have an extra 'note' in the subje
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:48 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:19 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Adam Williamson
>> >> wrote:
On 03/27/2012 05:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I think "removing the legacy cruft" just for the goal of removing it is not
helpful at all and is actually the main cause of "half baked", "half
removed" stuff in Fedora.
Interesting how did you come to that conclusion?
I assume that that mod_acces
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:48 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:19 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Adam Williamson
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wr
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:19 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> >
>> > Could I suggest that, if FESCo is going to have a di
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Kevin Kofler wrote:
My proposal is to just stop using release codenames NOW, including removing
the name for Fedora 17
+1
The names are useless. I can't even remember them because they seem
so arbitrary. At least the names on Ubuntu give you some indication of
which is ol
commit 3c2e5d5cee03f667c90e2ef78dcc6410299bf437
Author: Julian C. Dunn
Date: Tue Mar 27 14:42:59 2012 -0400
Initial import (#611372).
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Net-Twitter.spec | 82 +
sources |1 +
3 files cha
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-Twitter:
88665d245f72b48ee87817edb5906d00 Net-Twitter-3.18001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:19 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> >
> > Could I suggest that, if FESCo is going to have a different chair each
> > week, you at least have an SOP for arran
Le 27/03/2012 18:18, Joe Orton a écrit :
> Yup - the default config in the f18 httpd does load mod_access_compat,
> and I don't see a problem with shipping like that.
>
> It would be good to convert webapps over for f18, having said that.
It seems that mod_access_compat doesn't really work as e
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 15:53 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> So I really see two options for improving these situations:
> 1) https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/663 I opened this ticket two
> months ago (to silence). The idea would be to add the ability for bodhi
> updates to mark other update
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 16:44 -0400, Alex Lancaster wrote:
> Pkgdb link:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/bibus
>
> I kept myself on as a co-maintainer, but it deserves a more
> proactive main owner.
Hi Alex,
I've taken ownership: Thank you for maintaining it so far :)
--
Tha
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>
> Could I suggest that, if FESCo is going to have a different chair each
> week, you at least have an SOP for arranging the meetings, so that this
> kind of thing is done consist
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Could I suggest that, if FESCo is going to have a different chair each
week, you at least have an SOP for arranging the meetings, so that this
kind of thing is done consistently?
Just in the last two weeks we've had a FESCo meeting annou
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 14:51 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to write a yum plug-in: wait-for-kmod
>>
>> For quite a few users, the kmods from RPMFusion are a must. Take
>> broadcom wireless for example. Now, the kmods g
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 11:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> That's what the akmods are for...
Maybe, but the akmods are not usable in all cases. For instance, you
don't want akmods on servers, specially since it pulls in GCC. The
akmods do fail once in a while, when the changes between kernels
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:16 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Umm ... okay.
> >
> > Any particular reason?
>
> Kickstarts are not very user-friendly nor convenient (unless you have
> several machines to install with identical installs, which is what they were
> inve
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:41:18PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Perhaps, like Ubuntu's installer, the graphical part of Anaconda
> > > should concentrate on doing the simple stuff, and leave everything
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 14:51 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to write a yum plug-in: wait-for-kmod
>
> For quite a few users, the kmods from RPMFusion are a must. Take
> broadcom wireless for example. Now, the kmods generally lag the kernel
> updates by a few hours: people who do
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 13:22 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> Or indeed, if anyone can show me where this is documented. All I've
> managed to find with google are git commits and irrelevant mailing
> list fragments. systemd-logind isn't documented,
> /lib/udev/rules.d/70-uaccess.rules appears to deal wi
Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> This discussion started on the "board" list yet I know a lot of developers
> have an opinion on the topic.
Indeed. I and several others have pointed out this exact problem with the
"Beefy Miracle" release name (namely that it is offensive to most of India)
ever since
Le Mar 27 mars 2012 18:18, Joe Orton a écrit :
> Yup - the default config in the f18 httpd does load mod_access_compat,
> and I don't see a problem with shipping like that.
However, this module does not seem to be installed on http yum updates
--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
2012/3/27 Joe Orton :
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:09:08PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot said:
>> > The following is going to kill pretty much every packaged webapp unless
>> > they
>> > are changed now:
>> >
>> > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html#a
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> We are very good at inventing and implementing the latest and the
> greatest but terribly at removing the legacy cruff at the same time,
> which results in half baked implementation leaving various things in
> "compat" mode and half removed from the distribution/insta
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
>> "JO" == Joe Orton writes:
>
> JO> Yup - the default config in the f18 httpd does load
> JO> mod_access_compat, and I don't see a problem with shipping like
> JO> that.
>
> This is good news, because even if we convert the httpd.
> "JO" == Joe Orton writes:
JO> Yup - the default config in the f18 httpd does load
JO> mod_access_compat, and I don't see a problem with shipping like
JO> that.
This is good news, because even if we convert the httpd.conf.d files in
all of the packages, they're all marked %config(noreplace)
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:00:15PM +0530, Buddhike Kurera wrote:
> Hello,
> An idea found on the summer-coding list, please forward if you have
> any idea, comment.
More ML is better. Take a look at this link for the gory details of
how to submit packages:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageM
27.03.2012 20:18, Joe Orton написал:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:09:08PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot said:
The following is going to kill pretty much every packaged webapp unless they
are changed now:
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html#access
Did
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:09:08PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot said:
> > The following is going to kill pretty much every packaged webapp unless they
> > are changed now:
> >
> > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html#access
>
> Did you read this part:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> Use a chroot or an i686 vm. Or possibly just do rpmdev-extract on the i686
>> version and run it directly.
>
> I've been toying with a chroot via mock, but was awkward for a number
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Welcome to rpm. ELF files have a wacky concept called "color", which means
Color me impressed. That's one thing I didn't know!
> Use a chroot or an i686 vm. Or possibly just do rpmdev-extract on the i686
> version and run it directly.
I'
On 3/27/12 10:39 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
I am diagnosing a bug/odditywith a python library that uses Pyrex and
other oddities. In the course of that, I have installed python.i686 on
my F16 x86_64 system, and I'm trying to run it and... no dice!
According to rpm, python.x86_64 and python.i686
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802998
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
I am diagnosing a bug/odditywith a python library that uses Pyrex and
other oddities. In the course of that, I have installed python.i686 on
my F16 x86_64 system, and I'm trying to run it and... no dice!
According to rpm, python.x86_64 and python.i686 both own
/usr/bin/python and /usr/bin/python2.
Hello,
An idea found on the summer-coding list, please forward if you have
any idea, comment.
Thanks for the support !
Dear All,
Buddhike Kurera suggested me to write my idea and send it to this mailing list.
I am a functional programming advocate and would like to see Standard
ML projects in
On 26 March 2012 20:31, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Let's also mention our mass-update script:
> https://fedorahosted.org/kde-settings/browser/scripts
> which may or may not be of interest.
Very much of interest, thanks. I spent a couple of hours and wrote
mclazy, i.e. "I'm lazy and I'm trying to help
There will be a "GNOME Shell Software Rendering" Test Day on Thursday!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-29_Gnome_Shell_Software_Rendering
Here's an introduction from Vitezslav Humpa, who's in charge of this event from
QA perspective:
This week brings a second installment of Fedor
Compose started at Tue Mar 27 08:15:36 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
On 03/26/2012 11:55 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>
>> Well if you're just writing huge amounts of "random" data
>> to clear existing space, then you don't need it to be cryptographically
>> secure.
>> Why are you doing this exactly? Would /dev/
On 03/27/2012 05:23 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> So then the question is, if urandom is what's recommended, are faster
>> substitutes just as good? If they are just as good, then why aren't they the
>> first recommendation? And if this step
On 03/26/2012 11:01 PM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> As I already pointed out - the process is open. Anybody can step
> into in the early phase of naming selection and comment the
> potential problems. And I believe the Board members will think
> about the concerns raised (at least me ;-).
>
> S
Le Lun 26 mars 2012 22:09, Chris Adams a écrit :
> Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot said:
>> The following is going to kill pretty much every packaged webapp unless they
>> are changed now:
>>
>> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html#access
>
> Did you read this part:
>
> "The old a
On 03/27/2012 12:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
I disagree. Since this is a major update that gets introduced together with
a new Fedora version this opportunity should be used to make switches like
these. Otherwise you'll be forced to either keep this compat stuff around
for a long time (gi
46 matches
Mail list logo
