Hi
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:21 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Should I search for 'e17' if I want it?
>
>
It is not in the repo yet if you see the mail I sent
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:47 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
> wrote:
>>
>> This is E17, right? E16 is already there, isn't it?
>
>
> Yes. From a packaging stand point, they don't have anything in common
>
> Rahul
>
> --
> devel mailing l
On Jan 3, 2013, at 8:28 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2013-01-03 17:44 (GMT-0700) Chris Murphy composed:
>
>> My recollection on actual hardware though for F16 and F17 is that I see a
>> GRUB
>> menu. At the moment I don't have hardware to test, it's all multi-boot.
>
> Maybe you, newAnaconda a
On 2013-01-03 17:44 (GMT-0700) Chris Murphy composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
Maybe a virtual disk installation is somehow categorized as multiboot by the
F18 installer in configuring the Grub2 menu?
My recollection on actual hardware though for F16 and F17 is that I see a GRUB
menu. At the mo
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:58:32 -0600
Rex Dieter wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 06:51 PM, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
>
> >> 3. dblatex
> >>
> >> Currently, dblatex package hasn't been updated to texlive-2012
> >> dependencies, so it cannot be installed due to the incorrect
> >> passivetex requirements.
> >>
On 01/03/2013 06:51 PM, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
3. dblatex
Currently, dblatex package hasn't been updated to texlive-2012
dependencies, so it cannot be installed due to the incorrect
passivetex requirements.
This is bug, with patch here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891450
As
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2013-01-03 16:51 (GMT-0700) Chris Murphy composed:
>
>> On 2013-01-03 17:00 (GMT-0500), Mairin Duffy composed:
>
>
>>> It should be hidden for final releases, but not for testing and
>>> development releases. You may have upgraded from a beta
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 01:26 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 04.01.2013 01:21, schrieb drago01:
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Máirín Duffy
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu 03 Jan 2013 04:55:22 PM EST, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>> Documentation says "The GRUB menu defaults to being hidden,
> >>> exce
> 1. doxygen
>
> Added doxygen deps for pdf output, see:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891452
Fixed, thanks.
> 2. docbook5-style-xsl
>
> Typo, see:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891459
Fixed, thanks.
> 3. dblatex
>
> Currently, dblatex package hasn't been upd
On Jan 3, 2013, at 5:23 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> Maybe a virtual disk installation is somehow categorized as multiboot by the
> F18 installer in configuring the Grub2 menu?
My recollection on actual hardware though for F16 and F17 is that I see a GRUB
menu. At the moment I don't have hardware
On Jan 3, 2013, at 5:30 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
> Since you folks are testing, would anyone mind filing a bug against the
> documentation?
>
I did, I was just trying to get a confirm/deny that this is intended and if
it's stable before changing documentation.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
A simple short term solution might be to purge this statement from the
documentation for affected releases. If we should expect the splash only in
certain cases, of course the docs should state that expected behavior.
Since you folks are testing, would anyone mind filing a bug against the
document
Am 04.01.2013 01:21, schrieb drago01:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> On Thu 03 Jan 2013 04:55:22 PM EST, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> Documentation says "The GRUB menu defaults to being hidden,
>>> except on dual-boot systems." but as far as I know this hasn't been > true
On 2013-01-03 16:51 (GMT-0700) Chris Murphy composed:
On 2013-01-03 17:00 (GMT-0500), Mairin Duffy composed:
It should be hidden for final releases, but not for testing and
development releases. You may have upgraded from a beta or test
release, in which case your grub config file allowing it
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Thu 03 Jan 2013 04:55:22 PM EST, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Documentation says "The GRUB menu defaults to being hidden,
>> except on dual-boot systems." but as far as I know this hasn't been > true
>> since Fedora 16 when GRUB2 started being u
On Jan 3, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Thu 03 Jan 2013 04:55:22 PM EST, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Documentation says "The GRUB menu defaults to being hidden,
>> except on dual-boot systems." but as far as I know this hasn't been > true
>> since Fedora 16 when GRUB2 started being used
On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 15:01 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As discussed in the bug, if systemd-localed is doing 'fuzzy matching' it
> may be the case that we actually get a decent match for most layouts,
> I'll have to do more testing. But the situation is clearly different to
> the F17 one in th
On Thu 03 Jan 2013 04:55:22 PM EST, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Documentation says "The GRUB menu defaults to being hidden,
> except on dual-boot systems." but as far as I know this hasn't been > true
> since Fedora 16 when GRUB2 started being used. Is there a
> plan to revert back to a hidden GRUB menu
Documentation says "The GRUB menu defaults to being hidden, except on dual-boot
systems." but as far as I know this hasn't been true since Fedora 16 when GRUB2
started being used. Is there a plan to revert back to a hidden GRUB menu at
some point or is the current behavior stable?
Chris Murphy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 03:27:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Eric H. Christensen
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Can someone (everyone) take a look at the draft version of the sec
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Eric H. Christensen
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Can someone (everyone) take a look at the draft version of the secure boot
> guide[0], please? What's there was taken from what I found on the wiki but I
> want to make sure that the
On Tue, 01.01.13 10:48, Joel Rees (joel.r...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 31.12.12 07:38, John Reiser (jrei...@bitwagon.com) wrote:
> >
> >> > Cool, then write a sane tool that converts them online that doesn't pull
> >> > in Perl an
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 19:58 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 09:59:52AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Oh sure. I guess I need to draw a distinction between what I see as two
> > different cases. Which I'm sure you understand but I'm having trouble
> > describing clearly. I g
Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
>
> From:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-November/173356.html
>
> Now:
>
> Resolved, success. With fixes, am now able to
> build all the gcc docs in html/xml/pdf/epub/info, whatever. Phew!
>
> With caveats, as filed in Bugzilla under Fedora18, a
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 09:59:52AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Oh sure. I guess I need to draw a distinction between what I see as two
> different cases. Which I'm sure you understand but I'm having trouble
> describing clearly. I guess what I'm saying is, if
> there's /etc/keyboard.conf speci
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> In addition to those bugs, we have fairly significant regressions in the
> completeness of anaconda translations between Fedora 16 and Fedora 18
> (the numbers for F17 for some languages are weird - a lot of languages
> show 55% completion for F17 but
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 10:09 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
> > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891487 - anaconda
> > > doesn't
> > > seem to manage to offer all the keyboard layouts it could do, and
> > > some
> > > of the ones it's missing are somew
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 10:26 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 09:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > if
> > there's /etc/keyboard.conf specifying 'KEYBOARD=foo', [then] I should never
> > have to pass 'KEYBOARD=foo' as a cmdline to make foo my keyboard layout
> > in some case. As things stan
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 10:09 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891487 - anaconda
> > doesn't
> > seem to manage to offer all the keyboard layouts it could do, and
> > some
> > of the ones it's missing are somewhat important
>
> Already accepted as NTH,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can someone (everyone) take a look at the draft version of the secure boot
guide[0], please? What's there was taken from what I found on the wiki but I
want to make sure that the information that we've got in the guide is current
and answers the qu
On 01/03/2013 09:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> if
> there's /etc/keyboard.conf specifying 'KEYBOARD=foo', [then] I should never
> have to pass 'KEYBOARD=foo' as a cmdline to make foo my keyboard layout
> in some case. As things stand I believe I do, for passphrase entry
> during dracut.
The dra
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 18:53 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 03.01.13 09:38, Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > If we have such a tool, can we make the whole area of keymap
> > configuration much less insane? Right now we appear to have at least the
> > following:
>
> We
On Thu, 03.01.13 09:38, Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) wrote:
> If we have such a tool, can we make the whole area of keymap
> configuration much less insane? Right now we appear to have at least the
> following:
Well, we still will allow configuration of per-boot, per-system and
per-user
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 15:43 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 03.01.13 00:03, Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889562 - systemd
> > conversion from xkb to console layouts fails probably more than it
> > succeeds, when it does
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 14:19 +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 12:40 +:
> > On 01/03/2013 10:37 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > > So yes, these issues are serious, but IMHO rather a long-term problem we
> > > should focus on after releasing F18.
> >
>
Summary of changes:
8dcbf30... Initial import (#876405). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
- Original Message -
> From: "Miloslav Trmač"
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
> wrote:
> > = Features/DualstackNetworking =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking
>
> (Sending to the list instead of using the wiki talk page to hopefully
> gat
commit 8dcbf304e7a0b080331822f542b424c1f08cf1eb
Author: Miro Hrončok
Date: Thu Jan 3 17:52:52 2013 +0100
Initial import (#876405).
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp.spec | 67 +++
sources |
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp:
4c7ea40cd48028dce893c727396e6a60 Module-Build-WithXSpp-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fed
commit ebca744ce33e7fb381bf80add6d4f5febc6cdf2d
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jan 3 17:51:46 2013 +0100
0.72 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Net-DNS.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitigno
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-DNS:
393e48ec6f28abe5ed30204276e02775 Net-DNS-0.72.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
commit a9943e68ac5ac34d9a66f04da47565b4ceb0c577
Author: Miro Hrončok
Date: Thu Jan 3 17:50:51 2013 +0100
Initial import (#887846).
.gitignore |1 +
Math-Geometry-Voronoi-license-mail1.txt | 254 ++
Math-Geometry-Voronoi-license-mail2.txt |
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-Geometry-Voronoi:
44392be55ff56870aaff286dd735a5e2 Math-Geometry-Voronoi-1.3.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedo
commit 9f50deffd4f7e89dc96ff9e318a6fb5d181fd312
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Thu Jan 3 17:48:33 2013 +0100
1.623 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-DBI.spec | 12
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBI:
b45654dca3b495f3d496c359f0029d96 DBI-1.623.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/per
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890736
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC
- Original Message -
> From: "William Brown"
> 4) For link local to work "nicely", mDNS name resolution should be
> installed and available by default. Avahi can provide such a service
> for ipv6.
Avahi doesn't work for IPv6 link-local addresses and GLIBC doesn't even allow
nss-mdns to w
- Original Message -
> From: "Tomasz Torcz"
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:18:19AM +1030, William Brown wrote:
> > > > = Features/DualstackNetworking =
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking
> >
> > 1) For a user, there is no option in NetworkManager to enable
>
On 12/26/2012 11:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> [epiphany-extensions]
>> epiphany-extensions-3.6.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires
>> epiphany(abi) = 0:3.6
>
> Looks like this one needs to be retired now?
Yes.
I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875234 a while back
suggesting that epi
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Williamson"
>
> On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
> > wrote:
> > > = Features/DualstackNetworking =
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking
> >
> > (Se
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Clone:
6475432d91b1820eff1ae877ea5c8e3b Clone-0.34.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> [wine] wine-fonts-1.5.18-1.fc19.noarch requires
>> liberation-narrow-fonts
>
> This package doesn't exist anymore... wine needs adjusting for that. ;)
One more reason why Liberation 2.0 is a step backwards.
Can't we package liberation-narrow-fonts from Liberation 1 separate
- Original Message -
> From: "William Brown"
>
> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 00:01 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:48 PM, William Brown
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
> >
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 3. In the longer term, how can we get anaconda, i18n, systemd, GNOME etc
> folks all pointed in the same direction and working so that there's far
> less suckage and far more smooth interaction going on here? Should we
> try and run some sor
On 01/03/2013 04:01 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
I assume you are not using encrypted partition
I do.
Given that we are already that far behind the schedule few more months
hardly matter or at least delay the release up to the point this issues
are fixed.
Yes it does. Many already upg
On 01/03/2013 04:01 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
What is not right here while the distribution has significantly
increased in size the release cycle has not been extended to accommodate
for that ( amongst other growth pain we suffer from )
The number of packages might have increased, but i
- Original Message -
> ad 1) OK, feel free to ignore this, I don't really have time to go
> through all the bugs in last 4 fedora releases, since it won't (most
> probably) change your opinion.
> ad 2) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F16_bugs
Thanks for the link
https://fedoraproject
- Original Message -
> Hey, folks. I'm not really sure how to frame it, but the result of
> all
> my poking about at keyboard layout bugs and related stuff recently is
> that I'm pretty sad at the state of support for
> anything-but-U.S.-English in Fedora 18.
>
> Here's the tally:
>
> * h
On 01/03/2013 01:57 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
drago01 píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 14:43 +0100:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
drago01 píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 14:13 +0100:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Jiri Eischmann wrote:
Adam Williamson píše
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> In the meantime, until somebody wants to spend the time on writing this
> tool I think the best is to update the keyboard mapping table that
> systemd ships. I am more than happy to apply patches to that and it's no
> issue at all updati
On Thu, 03.01.13 00:03, Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) wrote:
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889562 - systemd
> conversion from xkb to console layouts fails probably more than it
> succeeds, when it does, you wind up with U.S. English as your console
> layout, not whatever
Compose started at Thu Jan 3 08:15:10 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dogtag-pki]
dogtag-pki-10.0.0-0.16.b3.fc19.noarch requires dogtag-pki-server-theme
>= 0:10.0.0
[ember]
ember-0.6.3-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libOgreMain.
drago01 píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 14:43 +0100:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > drago01 píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 14:13 +0100:
> >> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Fabian Deutsch
> >> wrote:
> >> > Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> >> >> Adam Williamson píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 0
Compose started at Thu Jan 3 09:15:17 UTC 2013
Updated Packages:
anaconda-18.37.8-1.fc18
---
* Fri Dec 21 2012 Brian C. Lane - 18.37.8-1
- hook up help window close button (#889570) (cherry picked from commit
128aa94a4dabfde0e7d3b14ddcec6b88a9308b08) (bcl)
* Fri De
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406#comment:12
. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta
ISOs) and testin
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> drago01 píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 14:13 +0100:
>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Fabian Deutsch
>> wrote:
>> > Jiri Eischmann wrote:
>> >> Adam Williamson píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 00:03 -0800:
>> >
>> > …
>> >
>> >> > 2. If not, do we want
drago01 píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 14:13 +0100:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> > Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> >> Adam Williamson píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 00:03 -0800:
> >
> > …
> >
> >> > 2. If not, do we want to engage in some Messaging around the F18 release
> >> > to emphas
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 12:40 +:
> On 01/03/2013 10:37 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > So yes, these issues are serious, but IMHO rather a long-term problem we
> > should focus on after releasing F18.
>
> I disagree I think we need to fix those things first.
>
> Ask you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/02/2013 03:09 PM, Lukas Berk wrote:
> Hey,
>
> [...]
>
>>
>> audit2allow is in policycoreutils-python these days I believe.
>>
>
> At least in rawhide (not sure about F18), audit2allow seems to have been
> moved from policycoreutils-python
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> Jiri Eischmann wrote:
>> Adam Williamson píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 00:03 -0800:
>
> …
>
>> > 2. If not, do we want to engage in some Messaging around the F18 release
>> > to emphasize that we know there are all these issues and we'll try to
>
- Original Message -
> Hey, folks. I'm not really sure how to frame it, but the result of
> all
> my poking about at keyboard layout bugs and related stuff recently is
> that I'm pretty sad at the state of support for
> anything-but-U.S.-English in Fedora 18.
>
> Here's the tally:
>
> * h
On 01/03/2013 10:37 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
So yes, these issues are serious, but IMHO rather a long-term problem we
should focus on after releasing F18.
I disagree I think we need to fix those things first.
Ask yourself this, If the roles where reversed and US keymaps and
translation was b
Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> Adam Williamson píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 00:03 -0800:
…
> > 2. If not, do we want to engage in some Messaging around the F18 release
> > to emphasize that we know there are all these issues and we'll try to
> > smooth things out for F19?
> >
…
> So yes, these issues are
Dne 3.1.2013 11:34, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 11:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 3.1.2013 10:51, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 20:17 +1030, William Brown wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 01:42 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 09:23 +00
Adam Williamson píše v Čt 03. 01. 2013 v 00:03 -0800:
> Hey, folks. I'm not really sure how to frame it, but the result of all
> my poking about at keyboard layout bugs and related stuff recently is
> that I'm pretty sad at the state of support for
> anything-but-U.S.-English in Fedora 18.
>
> Her
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 11:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 3.1.2013 10:51, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 20:17 +1030, William Brown wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 01:42 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 09:23 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
Dne 3.1.2013 10:51, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 20:17 +1030, William Brown wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 01:42 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 09:23 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 01/03/2013 08:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. I'm not
On 01/03/2013 09:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I really didn't want this to turn into a release philosophy thread, the
question was limited strictly to a 'how bad do we really think these
keymap issues are' thing.
Yes and I think they are bad enough that we should delay the release for
them an
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 20:17 +1030, William Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 01:42 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 09:23 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > > On 01/03/2013 08:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > Hey, folks. I'm not really sure how to frame it, bu
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 01:42 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 09:23 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 08:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Hey, folks. I'm not really sure how to frame it, but the result of all
> > > my poking about at keyboard layout bug
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 09:23 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 08:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey, folks. I'm not really sure how to frame it, but the result of all
> > my poking about at keyboard layout bugs and related stuff recently is
> > that I'm pretty sad at the stat
Dne 2.1.2013 20:07, Bill Nottingham napsal(a):
Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 12:08:31 +0100,
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hm, wondering why there are not automatically filled bugs about
broken dependencies. Wouldn't it be easier for tracking such
issues?
The owners g
On 01/03/2013 08:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. I'm not really sure how to frame it, but the result of all
my poking about at keyboard layout bugs and related stuff recently is
that I'm pretty sad at the state of support for
anything-but-U.S.-English in Fedora 18.
...
I don't really
Il 03/01/2013 09:03, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
> 1. In the short term, is the combination of all these factors enough for
> us to want to delay F18 further to try and make things suck less?
I was waiting for an e-mail like yours, and I am happy to see someone
speaking about a delay of F18 release
Hey, folks. I'm not really sure how to frame it, but the result of all
my poking about at keyboard layout bugs and related stuff recently is
that I'm pretty sad at the state of support for
anything-but-U.S.-English in Fedora 18.
Here's the tally:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8895
85 matches
Mail list logo
