On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Check this:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905396
>
The review is being done here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456. He needs to be
sponsored first! Any takers?
--
Arun S A G
http://zer0c00l.in/
--
Check this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905396
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
NOTE: The 64-bit Desktop and LXDE Lives are over their respective size
limits.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 3 (TC3)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808#comment:8 .
Plea
# F20 Final Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2013-11-27
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Freeze is now upon us and tomorrow (2013-11-27)
we'll be having another Blocker Review Meeting for Fedora 20.
There's plenty to review this time
On 26.11.2013 19:55, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Sandro Mani wrote:
[1] http://smani.fedorapeople.org/somepackage.spec
Yeah, that hack looks like it could work, sorta. If you have multiple
subpackages installed, having only one subpackage of the correct version and
the others of wrong versions will st
Hi,
Per the unresponsive package maintainers policy, I've opened
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029728 .
It has now been two weeks with no response, so I'm posting to the list to ask
if anyone knows how to contact Chitlesh.
Thanks.
-Ben
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
Il 26/11/2013 20:57, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
26.11.2013 20:00, punto...@libero.it пишет:
Il 26/11/2013 16:42, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
26.11.2013 15:06,punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
W dniu 25.11.2013 18:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 11:39:38 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Here is a quick and dirty spec implementing the idea I described:
> [1]. From what I can see it behaves correctly with any combination
> of packages and subpackages installed. Am I missing something?
> [1] http://smani.fedorapeople.org/somepa
26.11.2013 20:00, punto...@libero.it пишет:
> Il 26/11/2013 16:42, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
>> 26.11.2013 15:06, punto...@libero.it wrote:
>>> Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
>> Ho
Sandro Mani wrote:
> [1] http://smani.fedorapeople.org/somepackage.spec
Yeah, that hack looks like it could work, sorta. If you have multiple
subpackages installed, having only one subpackage of the correct version and
the others of wrong versions will still be satisfying the dependency in the
Simone Caronni wrote:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg57308.html
Hmmm, that guy is painting a somewhat different picture of the situation of
the 2 projects than your Change page. In particular, he claims the community
version is not dead. (Is that credible?) (He
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/26/2013 09:31 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 08:59 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/26/2013 08:34 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 12:02 +0100, Matthias Ru
#359: Create Ansible Playbooks for Deployment and Updating
---+-
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: major | Mi
Hi all,
as the Fedora 20 schedule[1] states the Final change freeze is upon
us. As of now only updates that fix an accepted Final Blocker bug or
Freeze exception will be allowed in.
we are at the post beta stage of release, so the Pre-release[3]
stage of the updates policy applies.
Regards
ke
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets bel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47525
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47525/0001-Ticket-47525-Need-to-add-locking-around-config-area-.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
At the KDE SIG meeting today, we made the hard decision to push
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
change/feature back to f21. There were simply too many sddm-related
blocker issues that would not be safely resolvable in time for f20 release.
As such, effective immediately,
Hi fedora ! Im reviving this thread about vagrant images.
I'd like to use packer.io to build vagrant images as part of the fedora builds.
I assume this means first we will need vagrant and packer packeged in fedora?
Or does fedora
allow the use of nonpackaged utilities to build side-artifa
Summary of changes:
51e5db9... Update to 1.4.2. (*)
b40cc69... Update to 1.4.3 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
Summary of changes:
b40cc69... Update to 1.4.3 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
Summary of changes:
51e5db9... Update to 1.4.2. (*)
b40cc69... Update to 1.4.3 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
Il 26/11/2013 16:42, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
26.11.2013 15:06, punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired so
26.11.2013 15:06, punto...@libero.it wrote:
> Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
>> 25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>>> W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired soon?
>>> No, there are no plans of retir
On 11/26/2013 03:12 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Hi everyone.
As i've been having a few discussions myself and following several of
them as well as plans about release cycles in the different WGs over
the past weeks and after FESCO discussed this in during their meetings
and in a FESCO ticket[1]
#438: Multiple builds fixing a bug show confusing status label
---+-
Reporter: kparal| Owner: mkrizek
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: minor |
Hi everyone.
As i've been having a few discussions myself and following several of
them as well as plans about release cycles in the different WGs over the
past weeks and after FESCO discussed this in during their meetings and
in a FESCO ticket[1] i get the feeling that we should be discussing
Dne 24.11.2013 00:34, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
There is pros and cons of each.
Agreed. And therefore forcing someone to use one of them or cricitice
someone for having Fedora project on Github is something I don't like.
Unless it's a proper policy and if such policy is proposed I would be
a
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 08:59 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/26/2013 08:34 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 12:02 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> >> On 11/25/2013 06:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 11:24
=
#fedora-meeting: (2013-11-26)
=
Meeting started by mmaslano at 13:00:25 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-11-26/environment_and_stacks.2013-11-26-13.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
tflink added a comment.
yeah, one of them was supposed to be for upgradepath. Can you change the title
of one of them depending on which task you were intending to take?
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T16
To: jskladan, tflink
Cc: qa-devel, tflink, jskladan
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/26/2013 08:34 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 12:02 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> On 11/25/2013 06:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 11:24 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>
This is kind of why
Hello,
On 16 November 2013 02:09, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Simone Caronni wrote:
> > Bareos is currently in standby following some legal issues:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#Bareos
>
> Can we know what the issues are? Switching would look like a no-brainer
> (old
> unmaint
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:07:55AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Hey,
>
> recently, I saw a few requests to update python-django to Django-1.6,
> the corresponding bug is [1].
>
> As there are quite a few changes, I'd expect this update to be harmful,
> at least
> - python-django-openstack-auth
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 12:02 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 11/25/2013 06:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 11:24 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is kind of why I keep coming back to: "Why do we have
> >> python-django at all?" I don't really see any reaso
On 11/21/2013 08:57 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
These two steps make it rather non-"simple"; one would also determine
which parts of the code base have not been exercised.
If the test suite is so weak that it doesn't cover such basic issues,
you will have trouble with *any* change, not just thi
On 26.11.2013 11:50, Christopher Meng wrote:
Isn't it should be implemented implicitly in RPM?
It is just a proof of concept/idea. Will hardly be implemented like
this, if something similar is going to be implemented.
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired soon?
No, there are no plans of retiring groovy. (Groovy can be either with
Ant or Gradle. F
On 26.11.2013 11:50, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mar 26 novembre 2013 03:55, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
There were multiple Bugs suggesting the same, they are linked together
for
example from this one from 2005. But it all got WONTFIXed:
Debug info RPMs do not "require" exact
Compose started at Tue Nov 26 07:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7
On 11/25/2013 06:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 11:24 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>>
>>
>> This is kind of why I keep coming back to: "Why do we have
>> python-django at all?" I don't really see any reason why we shouldn't
>> kill off the python-django package and just carry
Alex GS wrote:
> I'm a computer science major interested in Linux software engineering and
> just beginning to learn programming so I'm use-case #1 and #2. Currently
> out of all my peers I'm the only one using Linux as far as I know. Most
> students and developers even those working on Linux ori
Isn't it should be implemented implicitly in RPM?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Le Mar 26 novembre 2013 03:55, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> There were multiple Bugs suggesting the same, they are linked together
>> for
>> example from this one from 2005. But it all got WONTFIXed:
>> Debug info RPMs do not "require" exact maching binary rpm
>> https://bugz
On 26.11.2013 03:55, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
There were multiple Bugs suggesting the same, they are linked together for
example from this one from 2005. But it all got WONTFIXed:
Debug info RPMs do not "require" exact maching binary rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
>> How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired soon?
> No, there are no plans of retiring groovy. (Groovy can be either with
> Ant or Gradle. Fedora uses the first option.)
>
Thanks, Mik
WG meeting will be today at 13:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Next Steps ==
- PRD - based on discussion on env-and-stacks mailing list
== Open Floor ==
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: h
46 matches
Mail list logo
