Hi
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:13 PM, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
> How we build a rolling Iso script .. don't effect by Fedora or Anaconda
> release ??
>
>
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 12:13 AM, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
> How we build a rolling Iso script .. don't effect by Fedora or Anaconda
> release ??
Just use BFO[0]
[0]http://boot.fedoraproject.org/
--
-Igor Gnatenko
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
Hi,
I just updated ogre to 1.9.0 in rawhide[0].
There was so much changes in spec file, patches.
* dropped devel-doc, because couldn't find docs in tarballs (mercurial'ed)
* new subpackages:
** overlay - http://www.ogre3d.org/tikiwiki/tiki-index.php?page=-overlay
** volume - http://www.ogre3d.org
On 6-6-14 14:46:23 Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> We're
> wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF
The --advisory option.
--
Garry T. Williams
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://f
drago01 wrote:
> So I simply do not know whether the "remove patented code from he
> tarball" is simply paranoia or there is really a legal reason for it.
I've been asked by fedora-legal to remove stuff from tarballs on multiple
occasions for this reason.
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
How we build a rolling Iso script .. don't effect by Fedora or Anaconda release
??
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 21:03:38 +0200,
مصعب الزعبي wrote:
Hi List,
Any plans for rolling Fedora ??
For the foreseable future, if you want rolling you can use rawhide.
There have been discussions about this in the past and you can try to find
them if you want to read more about this.
--
Well rawhide could be considered as such but can break your build.
On 7 Jun 2014 20:04, "مصعب الزعبي" wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Any plans for rolling Fedora ??
>
> Regards
> Mosaab
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> F
Hi List,
Any plans for rolling Fedora ??
Regards
Mosaab
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 12:24:42 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> I can't do a git pull on my packages from home anymore. The heart of
> the problem is this:
...snip...
> This started recently, just a few weeks ago. Before that, I was able
> to do git operations from home with no problem. Is
> pkgs.fed
I can't do a git pull on my packages from home anymore. The heart of
the problem is this:
$ ssh -vvv jja...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org
OpenSSH_6.4, OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
debug1: Reading configuration data /home/jamesjer/.ssh/config
debug1: /home/jamesjer/.ssh/config line 4: Applying options
Till Maas wrote:
>
> The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build
> since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched,
> unless someone successfully builds them till then. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at
I'm orphaning drgeo and drgeo-doc. I originally picked them up because
I thought our school would use drgeo, but we haven't, so I'm letting it go.
drgeo did FTBFS in the latest rebuild, and will probably need some TLC
to get it building again. If you decide to take this, please note that
ups
14 matches
Mail list logo
