/*Kevin Kofler*/ wrote on Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:31:59 +0100:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform
in Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek
IMHO, this is not implementable for a
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 07:58:06PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 01:32:29PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > And let us know if you experience any issues while using the new driver.
>
> Do you prefer email, RH bugzilla or freedesktop bugzilla?
> Because (win)logo key + midd
On 02/24/2015 07:25 AM, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Can you elaborate on this? gsl has plenty of other routines that have
nothing to do with linear algebra. Is there a technical reason why you
have to link to a BLAS if the code using gsl does not ac
On 02/23/2015 09:46 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On 21 February 2015 at 18:50, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Because libgsl is no longer linked to a CBLAS library, packages linking to
GSL need to also link to a CBLAS library, ATLAS probably being the best
candidate since OpenBLAS is not available for all Fedo
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Mamoru TASAKA
wrote:
> Does
> %undefine _hardened_build
> help?
Thanks for the suggestion, but regrettably, now %configure does this:
checking C++ compiler ... ok (g++ is GCC 5.0)
determining architecture ... ok (x86_64)
determining compiler flags ... ok
CFLAG
Open bug please.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> I just messed up and did:
>
> # dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing upgrade
>
> and upgraded everything instead of just the thing I was trying to
> upgrade. I want to undo that, but it seems to be impossible.
>
> # dnf his
On 02/24/2015 05:22 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
Getting:
/builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-1.0.2/libs/base/include/mrpt/utils/mrpt_macros.h:296:150:
error: no match for 'operator<<' (operand types are
'std::basic_ostream' and 'std::ostringstream {aka
std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstrea
I just messed up and did:
# dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing upgrade
and upgraded everything instead of just the thing I was trying to
upgrade. I want to undo that, but it seems to be impossible.
# dnf history undo 119
[...]
No package libreoffice-base-1:4.3.5.2-11.fc21.x86_64 available.
Error:
Hello:
> I've got a package that is currently failing to build in Rawhide. It
> has a home-brewed garbage collector inside, and it appears the GC is
> confused about which objects are on the stack, and which are on the
> heap. I want to try building without the hardening flags to see if
> that h
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-02-25 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets bel
I've got a package that is currently failing to build in Rawhide. It
has a home-brewed garbage collector inside, and it appears the GC is
confused about which objects are on the stack, and which are on the
heap. I want to try building without the hardening flags to see if
that has something to do
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform
> in Fedora =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
>
> Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek
IMHO, this is not implementable for a simple practical reason: All the JARs
we ship are b
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Getting:
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-1.0.2/libs/base/include/mrpt/utils/mrpt_macros.h:296:150:
> error: no match for 'operator<<' (operand types are
> 'std::basic_ostream' and 'std::ostringstream {aka
> std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream}')
> #define ASSERT_NOT_EQUAL_(
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Hello,
> > "java" would be the preferred JRE in Fedora. The package would have no
> > content, but it would have Requires on preferred Fedora JRE, currently
> > java-1.8.0-openjdk. This could be easily changed as default JRE changes.
On 24 February 2015 at 10:25, Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> Can you elaborate on this? gsl has plenty of other routines that have
>> nothing to do with linear algebra. Is there a technical reason why you
>> have to link to a BLAS if the code using
Getting:
/builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-1.0.2/libs/base/include/mrpt/utils/mrpt_macros.h:296:150:
error: no match for 'operator<<' (operand types are 'std::basic_ostream'
and 'std::ostringstream {aka std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream}')
#define ASSERT_NOT_EQUAL_( __A, __B) { if (__A==__B) { std::os
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 13:32 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As described here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg
>
> We've been working on making xorg-x11-drv-libinput the default input
> driver for the Xorg xserver under Fedora 22.
I believe this may have brok
yeah
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203046.html
but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085761
Correction:
Bug 1085761 looks like the main bug, should we marked bug 1185565 was
duplicated of 1085761 ?
On Ter, 2015-02-24 at 22:39 +0800, Christopher
yeah
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203046.html
but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085761
looks like the main bug 1185565 should be marked was duplicated of
1085761
On Ter, 2015-02-24 at 22:39 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> https://lists.fedorap
On 24.02.2015 16:46, poma wrote:
> On 24.02.2015 01:47, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 07:54:55PM +0100, poma wrote:
>>> On 23.02.2015 13:32, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg
We've been
Hi All,
I have been reading this mail chain for some time and there is something
I wanted to say. It's kind of a long mail, I apologize for taking so
much of your time but request you to please bear with me. I work as a
technical consultant on IBM WebSphere, IBM BPM, Java/J2EE and Python
technolog
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 01:32:29PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> And let us know if you experience any issues while using the new driver.
Do you prefer email, RH bugzilla or freedesktop bugzilla?
Because (win)logo key + middle mouse click stopped working for
window resize. Logo key + left mouse
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:33:34AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >This looks cool.
> >On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> >
> > - Enable the monitoring flag for that Fedora package in pkgdb2[4].
> >
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Today's an important day on the Fedora 22 schedule[1], with several
significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point
[2]. That means that from now all Fedora 22 packages must be submitted
to updates-testing and pass the r
Hello,
> "java" would be the preferred JRE in Fedora. The package would have no
> content, but it would have Requires on preferred Fedora JRE, currently
> java-1.8.0-openjdk. This could be easily changed as default JRE changes.
> The same is for other binary subpackages of "java", respectively.
>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg
>
> We've been working on making xorg-x11-drv-libinput the default input driver
> for the Xorg xserver under Fedora 22. All the necessary changes for this a
On 24.02.2015 01:47, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 07:54:55PM +0100, poma wrote:
>> On 23.02.2015 13:32, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg
>>>
>>> We've been working on making xorg-x11-drv-libinput th
On 02/24/2015 05:21 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:37 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> On 02/24/2015 02:15 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>> On 02/24/2015 12:43 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
I am against official guidelines or policy for legacy JDK packages. I
don't think that a
Hi,
On 02/24/2015 06:02 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Út, 2015-02-24 at 10:42 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Debugging this took me ages, so I thought I would share this with you,
>with the new gdm on wayland landed in F-22 recently Xorg gets started
>as a regular user.
>
>This is a good th
On Út, 2015-02-24 at 10:42 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Debugging this took me ages, so I thought I would share this with you,
> with the new gdm on wayland landed in F-22 recently Xorg gets started
> as a regular user.
>
> This is a good thing as we want to move to Xorg running as a
On 24.02.2015 17:48, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
Yep, Qupzilla appeared on the list, but there's one single impeditive
for me: Qt4
All LXQt for now is Qt5 based.
Qupzilla should also built on Qt5, judging i.e. from [1].
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/qupzilla/
--
d
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Petr Hracek wrote:
> In our project called rebase-helper https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper
> we would like to analyze a new upstream version against an old upstream
> version
> and let user now what is changed. E.g. Binaries are missing, soname bump
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:33:34AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>This looks cool.
>On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
>
> - Enable the monitoring flag for that Fedora package in pkgdb2[4].
>
>I think this is the step people will forget to do. If there was at l
Yep, Qupzilla appeared on the list, but there's one single impeditive
for me: Qt4
All LXQt for now is Qt5 based.
[]'s
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 24.02.2015 17:19, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> We're about to finish last integration part, that is
On 24.02.2015 17:19, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
Yes
We're about to finish last integration part, that is pcmanfm-qt, and
with Qt 5.4.1 arriving, the previous drag and drop issues that plagued
0.9.0 release will be solved ( not LXQt fault ).
For the spin, we had a small discussion on defau
This looks cool.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
- Enable the monitoring flag for that Fedora package in pkgdb2[4].
I think this is the step people will forget to do. If there was at
least a reminder on the release-monitoring website, that would be
helpful.
--
devel mail
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:37 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 02:15 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > On 02/24/2015 12:43 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >> I am against official guidelines or policy for legacy JDK packages. I
> >> don't think that any such policy is needed and it would only enc
On 02/24/2015 04:59 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2015 8:32 AM, "Mikolaj Izdebski" wrote:
>>
>> On 02/24/2015 02:17 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
I would much rather live without any legacy jdk, and if so then
> without any
rules. But not setting
them will bring chaos for maj
Yes
We're about to finish last integration part, that is pcmanfm-qt, and
with Qt 5.4.1 arriving, the previous drag and drop issues that plagued
0.9.0 release will be solved ( not LXQt fault ).
For the spin, we had a small discussion on default applications, with
are a mixed feeling between keep l
On 20 February 2015 at 16:54, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 02/16/2015 04:17 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > I don't buy this argument wrt. Fedora.
> >
> > Fedora is a rapid moving, forward looking distro, in which such
> > regressions should be fixed and not be worked around by compat-libs.
>
> That ra
On Feb 24, 2015 8:32 AM, "Mikolaj Izdebski" wrote:
>
> On 02/24/2015 02:17 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >> I would much rather live without any legacy jdk, and if so then
without any
> >> rules. But not setting
> >> them will bring chaos for majority of users.
> >
> > I have a question: Is the
On 02/24/2015 04:36 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 10:12]:
>> On 02/24/2015 04:06 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>>> * Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 09:58]:
On 02/24/2015 03:32 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24
> 09:29]:
>>
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:19 +0100, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 02:58 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > [...]
> >> There were several attempts in past like "can you please support jdk
> >> 7,6...in newer fedoras" and we a
On Feb 24, 2015 2:57 AM, "Jaroslav Reznik" wrote:
>
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: LXQt =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt
>
> Change owner(s): Helio Chissini de Castro ,
> Christoph Wickert
>
> Package the LXQt desktop Environment for Fedora.
>
> * This Change is announced aft
* Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 10:12]:
> On 02/24/2015 04:06 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 09:58]:
> >> On 02/24/2015 03:32 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>> * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24
> >>> 09:29]:
> On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak
On 02/24/2015 02:17 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>> I would much rather live without any legacy jdk, and if so then without any
>> rules. But not setting
>> them will bring chaos for majority of users.
>
> I have a question: Is there anybody that stepped in to maintain the legacy
> jdk?
> If t
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Can you elaborate on this? gsl has plenty of other routines that have
> nothing to do with linear algebra. Is there a technical reason why you
> have to link to a BLAS if the code using gsl does not actually need a
> BLAS?
The blas symbols
On 02/24/2015 04:06 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 09:58]:
>> On 02/24/2015 03:32 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>>> * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24
>>> 09:29]:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
* Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 09:58]:
> On 02/24/2015 03:32 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24
> > 09:29]:
> >> On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>> * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24
> >>> 09:04]:
> On Tuesday,
On 02/24/2015 04:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 03:51 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
2.) Ensure dist upgrades remove old JDK package (which may no longer
get security updates).
Firstly, as I understand upgrade isn't supposed to remove packages by
default, unless they are obsole
On 02/24/2015 03:51 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> 2.) Ensure dist upgrades remove old JDK package (which may no longer
>> get security updates).
>
> Firstly, as I understand upgrade isn't supposed to remove packages by
> default, unless they are obsoleted or conflict with something. Are you
>
On 02/24/2015 03:32 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24 09:29]:
>> On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>>> * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24
>>> 09:04]:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
[...]
>
On 02/24/2015 01:34 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:43 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> [...]
>>> option one - introducing new packages - preferred
>>> 1. main jdk is proclaimed as dead as it was until now. The new jdk is
>>> derived
>>> as new package prviousName
On 02/24/2015 03:11 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24 09:04]:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
[...]
There were several attempts in past like "can you please
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203045.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1185565
May help.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code o
On 02/24/2015 02:15 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 12:43 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> I am against official guidelines or policy for legacy JDK packages. I
>> don't think that any such policy is needed and it would only encourage
>> adoption of old packages for which there might be no secu
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24 09:29]:
> On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24
> > 09:04]:
> > > On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > There were several attempts in past li
I'm working on a couple of reviews and fedora-review has failed with some
errors:
$ fedora-review -u https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3551 -m
fedora-rawhide-x86_64
INFO: Processing bug on url:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3551
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from
On 02/24/2015 02:58 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
[...]
There were several attempts in past like "can you please support jdk
7,6...in newer fedoras" and we always told no. When come speech about "do it
on your own" suddenly man
Le Tuesday 24 February 2015 12:47:58 Laurent Rineau a écrit :
> In Rawhide, the CGAL library has been updated to version 4.6-beta1. The
> SONAME is now libCGAL.so.11 instead of 10.
>
> There are a few minor API changes. Please have a look at the details on:
>
> http://www.cgal.org/releases.html
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24 09:04]:
> > On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > [...]
> > > There were several attempts in past like "can you please support jdk
> > > 7,6...in newer fedoras" and we a
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24 09:04]:
> On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> [...]
> > There were several attempts in past like "can you please support jdk
> > 7,6...in newer fedoras" and we always told no. When come speech about "do it
> > on your own" suddenl
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
[...]
> There were several attempts in past like "can you please support jdk
> 7,6...in newer fedoras" and we always told no. When come speech about "do it
> on your own" suddenly many questions marks raised up.
>
> The last open bug is: htt
On 02/24/2015 02:17 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jiri Vanek"
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:02:38 PM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On 02/24/2015 01:50 PM, D
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:59:24AM +1000, Dan Callaghan wrote:
> Excerpts from Ralph Bean's message of 2015-02-21 06:36 +10:00:
> > I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying
> > the
> > first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream
> > Relea
- Original Message -
> From: "Jiri Vanek"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:02:38 PM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
> platform in Fedora
>
> On 02/24/2015 01:50 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrot
On 02/24/2015 12:43 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
I am against official guidelines or policy for legacy JDK packages. I
don't think that any such policy is needed and it would only encourage
adoption of old packages for which there might be no security updates.
Well thats the point - people are c
Hi,
Without mass rebuild in f22, some lua module packages are broken for
example lua-posix, as lua uses different dirs for every release but
lua modules can't get rebuilt in time. I've filed a bug[1] against
lua-posix but some other lua packages are also affected.
I've seen some rebuilds by spot(
On 02/24/2015 01:50 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 13:34, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:43 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
[...]
option one - introducing new packages - preferred
1. main jdk is proclaimed as dead as it was un
Hello, I'm going to update libindi to version 1.0, which includes a soname
bump.
All the indi drivers and kstars must be rebuilt. Christian Dersch (lupinix)
is going to take of most of the rebuilds.
Best, Sergio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
Package maintainers are responsible for their packages. If maintainer of
"main JDK" is also maintaining "legacy JDK" then (s)he should be
responsible for both of them. I don't see why any special rule should be
defined.
You missed very important point. The maintainer will never be same. We (peo
On 02/24/2015 01:34 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:43 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
[...]
option one - introducing new packages - preferred
1. main jdk is proclaimed as dead as it was until now. The new jdk is derived
as new package prviousName-legacy
Fedora al
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 13:34, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:43 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> [...]
> > > option one - introducing new packages - preferred
> > > 1. main jdk is proclaimed as dead as it was until now. The new jdk is
> > > derived
> > > as
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:43 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
[...]
> > option one - introducing new packages - preferred
> > 1. main jdk is proclaimed as dead as it was until now. The new jdk is
> > derived
> > as new package prviousName-legacy
>
> Fedora already supports multiple JDKs
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Petr Hracek wrote:
>On 02/20/2015 09:36 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> Names of systems:
>
> - pkgdb is the familiar Fedora Package DB
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb
>It provides some flags used by the other systems.
> - anitya is the web app
In Rawhide, the CGAL library has been updated to version 4.6-beta1. The SONAME
is now libCGAL.so.11 instead of 10.
There are a few minor API changes. Please have a look at the details on:
http://www.cgal.org/releases.html#release4.6
--
Laurent Rineau
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LaurentRine
I am against official guidelines or policy for legacy JDK packages. I
don't think that any such policy is needed and it would only encourage
adoption of old packages for which there might be no security updates.
Of course package maintainers can agree on specific rules that apply to
their packages
On 02/20/2015 09:36 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying the
first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream Release
Monitoring tools this week. You can read about the details of the trio of
systems[1] now used to c
Greetings,
This e-mail is intended to inform you about the upcoming Bugzilla changes
happening March 3, 2015 (Rawhide bug rebase) and what you need to do, if
anything.
We will be automatically changing the version for most rawhide bugs to Fedora
22.
This will result in regular bugs reported aga
= Proposed Self Contained Change: LXQt =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt
Change owner(s): Helio Chissini de Castro ,
Christoph Wickert
Package the LXQt desktop Environment for Fedora.
* This Change is announced after the Change Submission Deadline as an
exception to the process. M
Hi all,
Debugging this took me ages, so I thought I would share this with you,
with the new gdm on wayland landed in F-22 recently Xorg gets started
as a regular user.
This is a good thing as we want to move to Xorg running as a regular user,
but we're not 100% there yet, so currently Xorg is st
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek
Currently Fedora supports one main Java runtime and Java Development Kit (JDK)
and from time to time one future JDK as a
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 03:36:11PM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
> I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying the
> first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream Release
> Monitoring tools this week. You can read about the details of the trio of
>
Hi,
On 24-02-15 10:12, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23.2.2015 v 13:43 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
Hi,
On 23-02-15 13:39, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23.2.2015 v 13:32 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
Hi All,
As described here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg
We've been working on making x
Dne 23.2.2015 v 13:43 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> On 23-02-15 13:39, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 23.2.2015 v 13:32 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> As described here:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg
>>>
>>> We've been working on making xorg-x11-drv-libinp
85 matches
Mail list logo
