Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora 26 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting on 2017-05-25 from 17:00:00 to 19:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering
meet to determine if the release cr
On 05/24/2017 02:12 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> Will Arm builders be added to COPR at some point?
Short answer: yes.
Longer answer: yeah, we have wanted to do so for a long time, but just
haven't gotten there. Hopefully in the next few months we will be
re-installing our private cloud setup, and a
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:22:43PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 24/05/17 09:58 -0500, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:19:05PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> >> today, I've accidentally attested there are no stability guarantees
> >> with the on-demand archives from common git ho
Will Arm builders be added to COPR at some point?
--
Jeff Ollie
The majestik møøse is one of the mäni interesting furry animals in Sweden.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapr
>> Although I fixed my problem with compiling libglvnd from upstream and
>> installing it myself.
>I don't understand how this would have fixed anything. Can you
elaborate?
I think you are right, I tried it again. after uninstalling glvnd and
reinstalling raw mesa-* packages from fedora. It does
W dniu 24.05.2017 o 17:32, Zdenek Dohnal pisze:
> Hi,
>
> I was doing rebase for gutenprint pre-release in recent rawhide (fc27)
> and I couldn't build it because I had %VERSION macro defined by myself
> and it got rewritten by default macro %version. That indicates rpm
> macros have been case ins
On 24/05/17 17:58 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
On 05/24/2017 05:49 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/05/17 17:32 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi,
I was doing rebase for gutenprint pre-release in recent rawhide (fc27)
and I couldn't build it because I had %VERSION macro defined by myself
and it go
On 05/24/2017 05:49 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 24/05/17 17:32 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was doing rebase for gutenprint pre-release in recent rawhide (fc27)
>> and I couldn't build it because I had %VERSION macro defined by myself
>> and it got rewritten by default macro %vers
On 24/05/17 17:32 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi,
I was doing rebase for gutenprint pre-release in recent rawhide (fc27)
and I couldn't build it because I had %VERSION macro defined by myself
and it got rewritten by default macro %version. That indicates rpm
macros have been case insensitive sin
On Wed, May 24, 2017, at 11:22 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> Nope, the point is that nothing has changed in the codebase or, for
> that matter, tags. It must have been GitHub that changed how its
> equivalent of "git archive" behaves.
Yep, that's happened in the past, obviously just happened again,
On 05/24/2017 02:00 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm not sure where it's best to report but today I wanted to probe the
> progress of Fedora MIPS [1] but since I'm not registered to this list
> I opted for the web archive. The first non-spam message [2] I could
> find is from March
Hi,
I was doing rebase for gutenprint pre-release in recent rawhide (fc27)
and I couldn't build it because I had %VERSION macro defined by myself
and it got rewritten by default macro %version. That indicates rpm
macros have been case insensitive since fc27 (colleague told me the same
situation is
On 24/05/17 09:58 -0500, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:19:05PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> today, I've accidentally attested there are no stability guarantees
>> with the on-demand archives from common git hosting sites when preparing
>> a new pacemaker update, redownloading "
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:19:05PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> Hello,
>
> today, I've accidentally attested there are no stability guarantees
> with the on-demand archives from common git hosting sites when preparing
> a new pacemaker update, redownloading "spectool -s 0 pacemaker.spec"
> of the o
Hello,
today, I've accidentally attested there are no stability guarantees
with the on-demand archives from common git hosting sites when preparing
a new pacemaker update, redownloading "spectool -s 0 pacemaker.spec"
of the original (-0.1.rc1, from 2 weeks ago) spec and comparing the
hashes, which
Hi Devel list!
In case you weren't aware Flock CFP is open! Please start thinking
about your submissions and registration now. The focus this year
should be "do-ing", so there is a general preference for hackfests and
workshops. The Flock committee will send more details on the kind of
submissi
On 05/23/2017 11:42 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 22.05.17 19:36, Nikolai Kondrashov (nikolai.kondras...@redhat.com)
wrote:
I'm talking about logins on console now, so I assume the service in question,
technically, is systemd-logind. However, I found out that it's working OK, and
the re
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:27:13AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >
> > The bugzilla was addressed -- can we give
> >
> > registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:26
> >
> > another try?
>
> Yes, it's on the agenda for today to go out with the
Hi there,
I'm not sure where it's best to report but today I wanted to probe the
progress of Fedora MIPS [1] but since I'm not registered to this list
I opted for the web archive. The first non-spam message [2] I could
find is from March, everything after that is just noise.
I suppose members of
19 matches
Mail list logo
