Hi all,
quite recently I've managed to remove the last thing that required
python2-tox: python-detox was switched to Python 3 [1].
So I went ahead and removed python2-tox [2].
However, I forgot to check buildrequires. I do apologize for that
overlook, apparently a couple of packages buildrequ
i can help, maintaining it
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just orphaned aircrack-ng, it needs more love than I am able to give
> it at the moment. It would be great to keep it in the distribution,
> though. Unfortunately there are some open bugs but since upstream j
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-05-08 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us on
Hi,
I have a problem with an unmaintained https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ga, a
dependency for https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nwchem.
Recently nwchem unbundled ga from its sources
https://github.com/nwchemgit/nwchem/issues/28, but that requires a recent ga
version, built
in a way that ma
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 27/137 (x86_64), 12/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 235053 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/235053
ID: 235054 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https:/
Hi,
I just orphaned aircrack-ng, it needs more love than I am able to give
it at the moment. It would be great to keep it in the distribution,
though. Unfortunately there are some open bugs but since upstream just
moved to GitHub there is at least hope that there will be bugfixes
eventually.
Kind
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 01:47:48PM -, rugk wrote:
> OpenSnitch is a new firewall client for Linux (https://www.opensnitch.io/).
> written in Go.
>
> It would be nice if this can be packaged, so users can get it.
Hi,
There's no open review in Fedora bugzilla, so you can package it.
If y
Planned Outage - Server updates - 2018-05-09 12:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2018-05-09 12:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-05-09 12:00UTC'
R
Planned Outage - Server updates - 2018-05-08 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2018-05-08 21:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-05-08 21:00UTC'
R
Planned Outage - Server updates - 2018-05-09 12:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2018-05-09 12:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-05-09 12:00UTC'
R
On 2018-05-07 11:43, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> gstreamer1 was updated to version 1.14.0 in f28 on March 21st:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1060701
>
> .. but not all its dependencies were rebuilt. While trying to update
> the libnice package now, libabigail tells me that
gstreamer1 was updated to version 1.14.0 in f28 on March 21st:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1060701
.. but not all its dependencies were rebuilt. While trying to update
the libnice package now, libabigail tells me that my update is backward-
incompatible because the symb
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180506.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180507.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 89
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.50 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Sure,
I think we can take my spec from copr[0], which I've worked on with
vondruch. Proper feature tests won't run until we get cucumber >= 3 to
Fedora, but that shouldn't matter.
What should be fixed is spec test - it is currently failing on some test
cases. However, current version of jekyll in
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 3:29 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
> Hi,
> I've tried to get updated rubygem-jekyll to fedora few months ago. It
stalled on old liquid unfortunately[0].
I am in the CC list for that bug, and I too saw that there was no progress.
I have recently taken over maintainership of
OpenSnitch is a new firewall client for Linux (https://www.opensnitch.io/).
written in Go.
It would be nice if this can be packaged, so users can get it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...
Hi,
I've tried to get updated rubygem-jekyll to fedora few months ago. It
stalled on old liquid unfortunately[0]. I've been building new versions of
rubygem-jekyll in my COPR[1] from time to time.
[0]
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/frantisekz/fedora-developer-portal/
[1] https://bugzilla.
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 7:52 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
> IMO all those traps and holes is possible to avoid by leaving 5.7 on
> community-mysql package and create completely new one
> community-mysql80.
> If you are not interested to maintain 5.7 line just split 5.7 and 8.0
> and assign 5.7 line pac
>
> I remember when MariaDB was first released, it and MySQL were compatible
> replacements for one another and this assumption was baked into plenty of
> other packages. Is this still true, and if not are there plans to
> coordinate with other packages to update things like client connector
> depe
On 7 May 2018 at 12:48, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
[..]
> I remember when MariaDB was first released, it and MySQL were compatible
> replacements for one another and this assumption was baked into plenty of
> other packages. Is this still true, and if not are there plans to coordinate
> with other p
On 7 May 2018 at 12:03, Jan Kurik wrote:
[..]
> Update of MySQL ( community-mysql package) in Fedora from 5.7 to 8.0 version.
1) After regular upgrade mysql server is completely not usable because
nothing is performing upgrade procedure by execute mysql_upgrade. No
warning, nothing is displayed
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 7:04 AM Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: MySQL 8 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MySQL_8
>
>
> Owner(s):
> * Michal Schorm
>
>
> Update of MySQL ( community-mysql package) in Fedora from 5.7 to 8.0
> version.
>
>
>
> == Detailed descriptio
On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 18:07 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Before requesting a new dist-git repository for a new package, you need to
> generate a pagure.io API token at https://pagure.io/settings/token/new, and
> save it
> into your local user configuration located at ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.
= Proposed Self Contained Change: MySQL 8 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MySQL_8
Owner(s):
* Michal Schorm
Update of MySQL ( community-mysql package) in Fedora from 5.7 to 8.0 version.
== Detailed description ==
Update of MySQL package in Fedora from 5.7 version to 8.0 version.
I use the default DE: Gnome 3.28.1.
Regards,
--
Lorenzo Dalrio
Il giorno lun 7 mag 2018 alle ore 12:15 Hans de Goede
ha scritto:
> Hi,
> On 03-05-18 10:50, Lorenzo Dalrio wrote:
> > Hi,
> > here is the output:
> >
> > # cat /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_version /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_date
> > JBET68
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 05/04/2018 04:42 PM, John Florian wrote:
> > Just checking my own PATH, I see some surprising things at the front:
> >
> > $ echo $PATH
> > /usr/libexec/python3-sphinx:/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 01:28:39PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> The spirit of the guidelines is to avoid using /opt and /etc/opt for
> software that fedora ships (and instead install to /usr and /etc). But
> this is a different case; Fedora doesn't ship Chrome and the package in
> question is an ex
Hi,
On 03-05-18 10:50, Lorenzo Dalrio wrote:
Hi,
here is the output:
# cat /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_version /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_date
JBET68WW (1.32 )
02/27/2018
I apply BIOS updates quite regularly.
Thank you, may I also ask which desktop-environment you are
using (because of GPU usage by
Hi,
On 02-05-18 18:14, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
Hans,
can't this be affected also by different disk vendors (drive vendor in Lenovo
laptop can vary even in same model) and different firmware of disks? Also,
drive FW is upgradeable in Lenovo laptops.
Normally this indeed is more disk then l
Hi all,
Last coordinated GNOME 3.28.x point release is this week: 3.28.2.
We still have the f28-gnome side target and same drill as usual to get
builds in the megaupdate: build with 'fedpkg build --target f28-gnome'
(or if you accidentally built without it, just do 'koji move-build
f28-updates-c
Hi all,
I am planning to update the rubygem-liquid package (which was orphaned, and
then taken by me) to the latest upstream release, 4.0.0.
This will break the current (really outdated) rubygem-jekyll package, which
depends on liquid < 4. I have reached out to rubygem-jekyll-owner (which
should
On 05/04/2018 04:42 PM, John Florian wrote:
On 2018-05-04 09:33, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I would do so for the following reasons:
1. Even though the security arguments are weak, they are going to be
checkmarks on audits which can't be changed for years.
2. When someone gets a "remove this a
32 matches
Mail list logo
