On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:41 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
> Funny (and scary) is that anaconda provides function to choose exact
> languages support when system is installed but nothing is added to
> /etc/rpm/macros to really make this choice real.
> %find_lang macro takes care of tagging some files
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:41 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 21:07, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_With_Langpacks
>> Language support groups in Comps file will get replaced by langpacks
>> package. With this Change w
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:38 AM wrote:
> Will gnome-control-center be able to install missing language packs and
> input sources?
> What about gnome-initial-setup?
>
Good questions but that is outside the scope of this Change. :-)
Eventually we would like that to be the case yes - but currently
+1, it would be nice to separate flatpaks from the actual distribution.
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity
https://splentity.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 1/10/19 11:47 AM, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> Thanks for bringing some attention to this, Ben. I don't do a whole lot of
> packaging, but I admit there are some places where the workflow could be
> improved. I'd be willing to join the group and help where I can.
>
> Some notes off the top of my hea
On 1/10/19 10:58 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
> things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1].
>
> I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which
> have arisen from the deprecation
> - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg
> fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit
> my-fas-acco...@my-domain.org'" in my .bashrc, because looking up how to solve
> the "koji says I'm unauthenticated" error got boring after the third time.
Mine
On 02. 01. 19 22:14, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FullyRemoveDeprecatedAndUnsafeFunctionsFromLibcrypt
== Summary ==
This change is about removing binary support for deprecated and unsafe
functions and bumping libcrypt.so to libcrypt.so.2.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:b
+1 from me. That seems like a nice reasonable thing for us to do. :)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I'd like to unretire the 'rtv' package in accordance with the
documented un-retirement policy.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rtv/commits/master
The package seems to have been retired because it could not build with
Python 3.7. However, I found that there were new upstream releases
which
Will be working on bringing exiv2-0.27.0 to rawhide over the coming days.
Includes both abi and minor api changes.
Tracking progress in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665246
in case anyone's aware of incompatibilities, can block that bug. Thanks.
According to repoquery, affecte
Thanks for bringing some attention to this, Ben. I don't do a whole lot of
packaging, but I admit there are some places where the workflow could be
improved. I'd be willing to join the group and help where I can.
Some notes off the top of my head that I ran into recently:
- fedpkg hides quite a
On 1/10/19 8:35 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Should a bug report be filed, and if so where?
Please file against pungi:
https://pagure.io/pungi/issues
Thanks!
kevin
--
>
> Marek Blaha wrote:
>
>> Looks like the problem is with fedora updates source repository metadata.
>> I've downloaded metalink
On 1/10/19 6:14 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As per
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package
>
> I'd like to take over python-tenacity so I can help maintain this as part
> of RDO.
>
> I did ask for commit
Hello,
We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1].
I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which
have arisen from the deprecation of pkgdb that have made the packager
workflow ever s
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:36 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
In the future, we'd like to switch to running gnome-initial-setup
prior to anaconda for language and keyboard layout selection, then
anaconda, then gnome-initial-setup again on firstboot. Anaconda would
therefore not be used for lang
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 21:07, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_With_Langpacks
>
> == Summary ==
> Language support groups in Comps file will get replaced by langpacks
> package. With this Change we want meta-packages like langpacks-ja to
> also
Will gnome-control-center be able to install missing language packs and
input sources?
What about gnome-initial-setup?
In the future, we'd like to switch to running gnome-initial-setup prior
to anaconda for language and keyboard layout selection, then anaconda,
then gnome-initial-setup agai
Should a bug report be filed, and if so where?
Marek Blaha wrote:
> Looks like the problem is with fedora updates source repository metadata.
> I've downloaded metalink from URL
> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-source-f29&arch=x86_64
> I checked a few mirrors fro
On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 09:11 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 19:07 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Can you explain what this "fedmsg integration" is? Is it just the
> > popups
> > like "nnn created an update for yyy"?
> > If it's just that, from my side I can say I f
Looks like the problem is with fedora updates source repository metadata.
I've downloaded metalink from URL
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-source-f29&arch=x86_64
I checked a few mirrors from the list and the content of primary metadata
file is somewhat unsatisfying
dnf download --source wireshark
[...]
No package wireshark-2.6.5-1.fc29.src available.
Exiting due to strict setting.
Error: No package wireshark-2.6.5-1.fc29.src available.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an e
Hello,
As per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package
I'd like to take over python-tenacity so I can help maintain this as part
of RDO.
I did ask for commit access here:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2045
but it was ju
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 19:07 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Can you explain what this "fedmsg integration" is? Is it just the
> popups
> like "nnn created an update for yyy"?
> If it's just that, from my side I can say I find those cute, but of
> no
> practical use.
Indeed, the popups
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 01:29:42PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:30:53PM -0500, John Harris wrote:
> > > The Fedora community cares about privacy and is adverse to tracking
> > > measures. We don't want to track; just count.
> > If this is ever implemented, we should pro
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:37 PM David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 14:56 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > E.g. if you net-install Fedora in Japanese language then installation
> > of any base package like libreoffice-core or man-pages are installing
> > automatically libreoffice-lang
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:23 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Randy Barlow wrote:
> > I don't know of a way that integration is useful, but I wanted to see
> > if others thought it was useful. So, do you find it useful?
>
> I just find those notifications annoying and pointless. This feature could
> poss
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:31:38PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:23 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> > > Do you plan to remove the comps groups? And
Hi,
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 14:56 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> E.g. if you net-install Fedora in Japanese language then installation
> of any base package like libreoffice-core or man-pages are installing
> automatically libreoffice-langpack-ja or man-pages-ja but langpacks-
> ja
> is not installing a
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 09:43:01AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Moreover, afair we install and enable NTP clients by default on all
> our installations, no? just like pretty much any other OS these days
> does... counting by NTP mostly just means switching from NTP pool
> servers to fedora's
Hello Chris,
As Petr Pisar said it, last Fedora's kernel uses a compiled binary software
sign-file file. It
is still a perl script in RHEL.
Your command line should work if you remove perl invocation:
/usr/src/kernels/4.19.14-300.fc29.x86_64/scripts/sign-file sha256
/home/chris/MOK.priv /home/c
> Actually, Bodhi relies on Fedora Packages, which is experiencing
> problems in updating its database:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/issues/410
Ah - yes I did notice that it wasn't coming up in
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ either. That would explain
why Bodhi doe
On 2019-01-10, Chris Murphy wrote:
> [root@fnuc extra]# perl
> /usr/src/kernels/4.19.14-300.fc29.x86_64/scripts/sign-file sha256
> /home/chris/MOK.priv /home/chris/MOK.der icp.ko
> Unrecognized character \x7F; marked by <-- HERE after <-- HERE near
> column 1 at /usr/src/kernels/4.19.14-300.fc29.x
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:03 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 1/9/19 10:03 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > I'm not finding an updated version of this documentation:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/26/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sect-signing-kernel-module-with-the-private-key.html
> >
34 matches
Mail list logo
