Re: when will bodhi (updates) recognize fc31/f31 updates

On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 22:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 8/15/19 7:44 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > On to, 15 elo 2019, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:21 AM Alexander Bokovoy > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On to, 15 elo 2019, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > >>> >I've tried to submit a bu

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On 2019-08-18 02:57, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 18.08.2019 2:24, Joseph D. Wagner wrote: The Plymouth LUKS password prompt will wait FOREVER for me to type in a password This is intended, because system is not even started yet on LUKS-encrypted media attach stage. It is intended t

Re: Fedora-29-updates-testing-20190819.0 compose check report

>From the build logs [1] [2] , it looks like disk got full which could be builder specific. We can dig in more if it happens again. [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37134473 [2] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4473/37134473/screenshot.ppm On Mon, Aug 19, 2019

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

For what it's worth, my research group attacked basically exactly this problem quite some time ago. We built a modified Linux kernel that we called Redline that was impervious to fork bombs, malloc bombs, and so on. No process could take down the system, much less unprivileged ones. I think some of

Fedora-29-updates-testing-20190819.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubsc

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:55 PM Gordan Bobic wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:07 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: >> >> Gordan Bobic wrote: >> > Right, but is it better that _everything_ else suffers with more memory >> > pressure for the handful of relatively infrequent use cases for which >> > ulimit

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:07 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > Gordan Bobic wrote: > > Right, but is it better that _everything_ else suffers with more memory > > pressure for the handful of relatively infrequent use cases for which > > ulimit can be used to explicitly raise the limit? > > Well, as I wrot

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

Gordan Bobic wrote: > Right, but is it better that _everything_ else suffers with more memory > pressure for the handful of relatively infrequent use cases for which > ulimit can be used to explicitly raise the limit? Well, as I wrote, a lower limit might actually make sense on ARM. But modern x8

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 8:51 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > Gordan Bobic wrote: > > It may be simpler to approach the question from the other side, i.e. is > > there anything that actually ever needs more than 1MB of stack space? If > > there is, I haven't seen it in the decade since I've been using th

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

Gordan Bobic wrote: > Adding -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections to defaults can help > considerably in producing smaller binaries, and is not the default. > Linking with -Wl,--gc-sections helps a lot and is not the default Well, -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Wl,--gc-sections mostly helps i

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

Gordan Bobic wrote: > It may be simpler to approach the question from the other side, i.e. is > there anything that actually ever needs more than 1MB of stack space? If > there is, I haven't seen it in the decade since I've been using this tweak > with various Fedora derived distributions. I've mo

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

> It may be simpler to approach the question from the other side, i.e. is there > anything that actually ever needs more than 1MB of stack space? If there is, > I haven't seen it in the decade since I've been using this tweak with various > Fedora derived distributions. Any application allowing

Re: Request for write permission of menu-cache in Fedora

Ping for updates. On 7/23/19 8:51 PM, Zamir SUN wrote: > Ping for updates. > > I've build menu-cach 1.1.0 in Copr and already tested against LXQt. > > If you are not willing to grant me write permission, can you build this > in EPEL directly? > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/zsun/epe

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:33 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > Adding -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections to defaults can help > considerably in producing smaller binaries, and is not the default. > > > Linking with -Wl,--gc-sections helps a lot and is not the default > > > > These OT

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

Hi, On 18-08-19 15:25, Gordan Bobic wrote: On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:06 PM Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi, On 18-08-19 13:33, Gordan Bobic wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:36 AM http://gnome.org> > wrote: >  > This seems like a dis

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:06 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 18-08-19 13:33, Gordan Bobic wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:36 AM http://gnome.org/>> wrote: > > > This seems like a distraction from the real goal here, which is to > > > ensure Fedora remains responsive under heavy memo

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

Hi, On 18-08-19 13:33, Gordan Bobic wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:36 AM http://gnome.org/>> wrote: > This seems like a distraction from the real goal here, which is to > ensure Fedora remains responsive under heavy memory pressure, I think this is an overwhelmingly important point, and a

Re: startx unsets DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS, which breaks user D-Bus session

Hi, On 24-10-18 00:53, Alexey Rochev wrote: Hello, I would like to draw some attention to this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622259. Description: startx unsets DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS, which result in launching another D-Bus session which breaks communicating with user sy

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:36 AM wrote: > This seems like a distraction from the real goal here, which is to > ensure Fedora remains responsive under heavy memory pressure, I think this is an overwhelmingly important point, and as somebody regularly working with ARM machines with tiny amounts of

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On 18.08.2019 2:24, Joseph D. Wagner wrote: > The Plymouth LUKS password prompt will wait FOREVER for me to type in a > password This is intended, because system is not even started yet on LUKS-encrypted media attach stage. If you don't want to enter LUKS password on every boot, you should use TP

Re: not sending emails for the semiannual rawhide→branched bug assignment update

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 11:35:12AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 18. 08. 19 10:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >Bugzilla now has "This is a minor update (do not send email)" checkbox in the > >web interface. I hope the same setting is available through the API. > >When bugs are reassigne

Re: not sending emails for the semiannual rawhide→branched bug assignment update

On 18. 08. 19 10:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Bugzilla now has "This is a minor update (do not send email)" checkbox in the web interface. I hope the same setting is available through the API. When bugs are reassigned (e.g. the recent rawhide→F31 reassignment), maybe this could be used

Re: vdr-epg-daemon does not compile on f32

I changed a few things in the spec file [1], but the compilation breaks on f30. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vdr-epg-daemon/blob/master/f/vdr-epg-daemon.spec make[1]: Entering directory '/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.146/epglv' gcc -c -I/usr/include/mysql -fPIC -L/usr

not sending emails for the semiannual rawhide→branched bug assignment update

Bugzilla now has "This is a minor update (do not send email)" checkbox in the web interface. I hope the same setting is available through the API. When bugs are reassigned (e.g. the recent rawhide→F31 reassignment), maybe this could be used to not send mail notifications? Zbyszek _