On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 9:11 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> New projection when we will be finished is 2025-01-11 (we are slowing down.
> Again. :( ). Pure linear approximation.
It might not be as bad as you think!
All rust-* packages had been excluded from tracking since the start,
so the progre
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 7:02 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> exiv2 has had a new release for a few months now - 0.28.0 - which causes
> an soname bump.
>
> I've put up a PR for the update -
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/pull-request/3 - would
> appreciate people tak
I think it is actually because of a change proposal, there was a recent
email about the webkit2gtk4.0 package changing:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IFRPWZNEFEGXGQFRNTH4LTFFLTJ5DOCL/,
so it is actually a problem I think.
-Ian
On Mon, Aug 21,
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 02:01:37PM -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> exiv2 has had a new release for a few months now - 0.28.0 - which causes
> an soname bump.
>
> I've put up a PR for the update -
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/pull-request/3 - would
> appreciate p
Dear all,
exiv2 has had a new release for a few months now - 0.28.0 - which causes
an soname bump.
I've put up a PR for the update -
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/pull-request/3 - would
appreciate people taking a close look at this; I'll also prepare a COPR
with the dependent packages
Looks like it is a mirror issue. Adding --enablerepo=local corrects it.
Please disregard my previous email.
Steve
On 8/21/23 02:41 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
Not sure if this is a known problem, but I'm getting build failures from mock
on rawhide. F37, F38, and F39 are ok.
Ste
Not sure if this is a known problem, but I'm getting build failures from mock
on rawhide. F37, F38, and F39 are ok.
Steve
Error:
Problem: package wxGTK-devel-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora requires
libwx_gtk3u_webview-3.2.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
In one week, 2023-08-28, I plan to update abseil-cpp from 20230125.3 to
20230802.0 (Abseil LTS branch, Aug 2023)[1] in side tags for F40/Rawhide
and F39/Branched.
Like all new calendar versions of abseil-cpp, this breaks ABI
compatibility and bumps the SONAME version. There are no intentional
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:17:21PM +0200, Marián Konček wrote:
> I opened a PR adding mingw subpackages to libsodium according to my best
> knowledge (which is not too large related to mingw packaging):
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libsodium/pull-request/3
>
> I talked with the maintainer
Hi
Please check out [1] for a sample unified native/mingw spec with
autotools build. Specific remarks:
- Add %{?mingw_debug_package}
- Explicit BR on mingw-binutils probably unnecessary
- Try %global _configure ../configure instead of cloning the entire
source tree
- Add %mingw_debug_install
I opened a PR adding mingw subpackages to libsodium according to my best
knowledge (which is not too large related to mingw packaging):
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libsodium/pull-request/3
I talked with the maintainer and it could be accepted, but I would like
someone more experienced f
Sounds good!
Leslie Satenstein
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 05:08:06 a.m. GMT-4, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
On Do, 17.08.23 08:25, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote:
> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> > Yes, and if this is not what you want, then disable the
>
Hello.
I am the main admin of python-argcomplete in Fedora. The package is severely
outdated but works.
I don't want to maintain it, but pytest uses it for tests, so I don't want to
be retired. Is there somebody else who would take better care of it than I do?
$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide
On Do, 17.08.23 08:25, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote:
> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> > Yes, and if this is not what you want, then disable the
> > ratelimit. That's what I am saying?
>
> It would be useful for systemd to have "cooldown periods" for things,
> similar to ine
Dne 21. 08. 23 v 10:32 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
Over the time we had several workshops about SPDX. Some people did the SPDX
migrations for others (me included).
Some of the PR are not merged yet. E.g.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/251
The License: field is
* Miroslav Suchý:
> Over the time we had several workshops about SPDX. Some people did the SPDX
> migrations for others (me included).
>
> Some of the PR are not merged yet. E.g.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/251
The License: field is incomplete, it needs
17 matches
Mail list logo
