status openssl1.1

2023-10-15 Thread josef radinger via devel
Hi openssl1.1 reached EOS on recently (11th September 2023 I assume) https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/03/28/1.1.1-EOL/ according to https://www.openssl.org/source/: ... The previous LTS version (the 1.1.1 series) is also available but has recently gone out of support. ... paid extended

Re: Orphaning all my packages

2023-10-15 Thread Aaron Rainbolt
On 10/16/23 00:20, Peter Boy wrote: Sorry for top posting. But my question doesn’t fit to a specific post. And I don’t like to contribute to getting off-topic. But ... I followed the thread and various similar discussions closely. My question is: Who is really suffering from the famous „June d

Re: Orphaning all my packages

2023-10-15 Thread Peter Boy
Sorry for top posting. But my question doesn’t fit to a specific post. And I don’t like to contribute to getting off-topic. But ... I followed the thread and various similar discussions closely. My question is: Who is really suffering from the famous „June decision“ of Red Hat? I don’t get it.

Re: [Test-Announce] 2023-10-16 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2023-10-15 Thread Leslie Satenstein via devel
14 Oct version Everything.iso anaconda failed on my system at the step where it has to create the network setup for the target Gnome system. Up to that point, installation went well.  Same place for workstation setup. Sorry, can't seem to post elsewhere, Someone please Leslie Satenstein

Re: Error when patching test-requirements inside pymemcache source

2023-10-15 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
Hi Priscila, On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 6:48 PM Priscila Gutierres wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to patch pymemcache/test-requirements.txt to unpin all the build > requirements. > > I created this patch using git format-patch: > https://paste.centos.org/view/46800819 This patch is wrong. The f

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] SPDX short name for "Redistributable, no modification permitted" (firmware)

2023-10-15 Thread Richard Fontana
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 5:13 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data. > > I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no > modification > permitted" in SPDX. > > The license is: > > The files in the directory

Re: SPDX short name for "Redistributable, no modification permitted" (firmware)

2023-10-15 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 4:26 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 3:13 AM Robert-André Mauchin > wrote: > > I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data. > > > > I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no > > modification > > permitted"

Re: SPDX short name for "Redistributable, no modification permitted" (firmware)

2023-10-15 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 3:13 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data. > > I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no > modification > permitted" in SPDX. [snip] > What can I use for SPDX? According to https://doc

Fedora 39 compose report: 20231015.n.0 changes

2023-10-15 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-39-20231014.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20231015.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231015.n.0 changes

2023-10-15 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231014.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231015.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 38 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 1.43 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: SPDX Statistics - Miracle of the Sun edition

2023-10-15 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On 10/13/23 08:15, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Hot news: There was new release of SPDX License list. If you want to see impact of Fedora work you can check number of new licenses in recent releases and compare https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/releases and compare it with content of the rel

Re: SPDX Statistics - Miracle of the Sun edition

2023-10-15 Thread zebob . m
On 10/13/23 2:46 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Fri, Oct 13 2023 at 08:15:39 AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Scancode-toolkit is not yet in Fedora, but you can instal it form PyPI: > >     $ pip install scancode-toolkit > $  ~/.local/bin/scancode --license --html /tmp/spdx.html . > I

Re: Error when patching test-requirements inside pymemcache source

2023-10-15 Thread Priscila Gutierres
Soy, this is the right spec: https://paste.centos.org/view/4777a5e7 On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 7:00 AM Priscila Gutierres wrote: > Yes, the package is listed in the specfile: > https://paste.centos.org/view/cd69e93f > Also, this is my development branch: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/prguti

Re: Error when patching test-requirements inside pymemcache source

2023-10-15 Thread Priscila Gutierres
Yes, the package is listed in the specfile: https://paste.centos.org/view/cd69e93f Also, this is my development branch: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/prgutier/rpms/python-pymemcache On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 11:50 PM Otto Liljalaakso wrote: > 15. lokakuuta 2023 1.47.49 GMT+03:00 Priscila Gut

SPDX short name for "Redistributable, no modification permitted" (firmware)

2023-10-15 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
Hi, I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data. I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no modification permitted" in SPDX. The license is: The files in the directory src/miniloader are provided pursuant to the following license agreement: