Hello,
I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on possibly
new defects identified by static analyzers in Critical Path Packages that
have changed in Fedora 41. For context, please see my previous email[1].
TLDR: This report[2] contains 73976 identified defects. Please review
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 7:45 PM Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>
> I am updating libqalculate to v5.2.0 which bumps the soname version. I
> will rebuild the following packages that depend on libqalculate.
>
> plasma-workspace
> step
> cantor
> qalculate-kde
Looks like you forgot to rebuild these packages
I am updating libqalculate to v5.2.0 which bumps the soname version. I
will rebuild the following packages that depend on libqalculate.
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
Thanks,
Mukundan.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
Hello all,
A few months back I have started a project called
"bign-handheld-thumbnailer" which acts as a thumbnailer for Nintendo
DS and Nintendo 3DS files.
It was started as a successor/rewrite of gnome-nds-thumbnailer
(https://gitlab.gnome.org/Archive/gnome-nds-thumbnailer) in Rust, but
I decid
Hello Daniel,
> On 5. Jul 2024, at 15:33, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> It isn't listed there, but it certainly should be, as we've not
> been considering it FIPS compliant, for precisely this reason.
OK. I’ve asked our docs team to add it to the list. Thank you for bringing this
to my attenti
On Friday, 05 July 2024 at 16:16, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> Finally, I have a question about compiling, here I get error messages
> [2] with the requirement. How can solve this?
>
> [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/mellowplayer.spec
> [2] https://koj
Thank you for your answer.
Finally, I have a question about compiling, here I get error messages [2] with
the requirement. How can
solve this?
[1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/mellowplayer.spec
[2] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1808/120031808/build.log
Regards
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 02:59:36PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 5. Jul 2024, at 14:49, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 02:37:41PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Please start addressing this with whoever maintains the TPM specification.
> >
> >
Hi,
> On 5. Jul 2024, at 14:49, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 02:37:41PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
>>
>>
>> Please start addressing this with whoever maintains the TPM specification.
>
> The TPM spec is maintained by the Trusted Computing Group, and I have
> no influe
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 02:06:33PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
> I’m sure Dmitry would be happy to do that if we as a community could
> agree to no longer support OpenSSL ENGINEs, but it doesn’t seem that
> this consensus exists in Fedora. This leaves us with deprecating
> ENGINEs to give package
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 02:37:41PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 5. Jul 2024, at 12:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >
> > I've (re-)discovered that this change is going to impact on swtpm that is
> > used with QEMU to provide a virtual TPM to guests.
> >
> > The TPM2 specification h
Hi,
> On 5. Jul 2024, at 14:24, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> I wonder if it would be possible (of course it is technically possible,
> more like how hard it would be) to make the OpenSSL devel package
> conditionally define OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE if another package is
> not installed. I can think of at
Hi,
> On 5. Jul 2024, at 12:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> I've (re-)discovered that this change is going to impact on swtpm that is
> used with QEMU to provide a virtual TPM to guests.
>
> The TPM2 specification has fully crypto agility, however, the sha1
> algorithm is one of the few that
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 11:10:08AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 02:05:38PM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> > In the long-term it would be better to provide a patch fixing build of the
> > package. Probably adding -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE to build flags will work.
> > Engines are d
Hi, please see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Metrics#Who_will_have_access_to_metrics_data
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi,
> On 5. Jul 2024, at 12:10, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 02:05:38PM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>> In the long-term it would be better to provide a patch fixing build of the
>> package. Probably adding -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE to build flags will work.
>> Engines are deprecate
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 04:56:03PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 9:37 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992935
> >
> > A new version of ocamlbuild (Fedora: ocaml-ocamlbuild) was found.
> > However the version isn't 4.02.3, bu
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240704.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240705.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 51
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 650.93 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:40:22PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 10. Jun 2024, at 20:16, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> I wish this proposal included some examples of what might get broken
> >> and what will keep wo
On Friday, 05 July 2024 at 09:01, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > On Thursday, 04 July 2024 at 17:00, Martin Gansser wrote:
> > > when remove the RPATH i get this error message [1]:
> > > [...]
> > > ERROR 0002: file '/usr/bin/MellowPlayer' contains an invalid rp
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 02:05:38PM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> In the long-term it would be better to provide a patch fixing build of the
> package. Probably adding -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE to build flags will work.
> Engines are deprecated. You should not use engines and should migrate to
> provi
On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:02:01 +0200, Marián Konček wrote:
> To my knowledge there is no such project.
Only highly experimental ones have been used many, many years ago. For
example, in Fedora land I've caught some unused BuildRequires with a
script that checks whether shared libs provided by build
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Thursday, 04 July 2024 at 17:00, Martin Gansser wrote:
> > when remove the RPATH i get this error message [1]:
> > [...]
> > ERROR 0002: file '/usr/bin/MellowPlayer' contains an invalid rpath
> > '/usr/' in [/usr/lib64/mellowplayer:/usr/]
> > The compla
23 matches
Mail list logo
