Hi,
I'd like to unretire novnc in EPEL6, it was retired on 2014-12-20
because of broken deps:
unresolved dependencies for openstack-nova-novncproxy-0.4-2.el6.noarch:
openstack-nova
This will be fixed by importing latest Fedora build which removed
openstack-nova dependency in 0.4-7
I also
> In addition to the standard RHEL base repositories please ensure the
> following repositories are also enabled.
>
> [rhel-7-server-extras-rpms]
> name = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server - Extras (RPMs)
>
> [rhel-7-server-optional-rpms]
> name = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server - Optional (RPMs)
> Package collectd
> comaintained by: apevec fab
ok, that's epel branches, I'll take them.
Alan (fas: apevec)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Thursday is OpenStack Test Day[2].
> [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-08_OpenStack_Test_Day
You can also join Openstack testing today on your current trusty
Fedora 16 installation by using fresh Openstack Preview reposito
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Andrew Elwell wrote:
> 2) [mutterings about maintainer non-responsiveness for collectd
> removed as I've just seen him update BZ #797773 ]
Feel free to apply as a co-maintainer :)
> 3) Given that this is a major version bump (even if there's a
> backwards compat
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Kévin Raymond
wrote:
> I've managed to get the whole list of transifex.net projects
Semi-related question: what's the procedure to get new language team
approved on transifex?
I see few teams hanging in requested state at
https://fedora.transifex.net/projects/p/fe
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> That's precisely what the new "stack" or "scl" concept that Marcela wrote
> about needs. We don't have a complete documentation out yet, but we will,
> soon (hopefully).
Random idea after looking at http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/scl-utils
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> Renaming current "Virtualization" to "Virtualization Client" makes sense.
Oops, just found there's already "Virtualization Client
How can I push this change to comps.git ?
Alan
From 56d295c07996349c2b1e28847ec6bd4edebf674d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Pevec
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:04:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v2] add Virtualization Hypervisor group
Smallest possible virtualization host installation
for headless nodes, wit
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> You don't mention the eisting 'Virtualization' group there, which
> is historically what people have installed when wanting a virtualization
> host. Admittedly this does include some desktop tools too.
Right, I forgot to mention why exi
of actual comps groups
- any better suggestions for the name of the group, maybe
"Virtualization Minimal", "Minimal Hypervisor", "Virtualization Node"
?
Thanks,
Alan
From 0d381fd2feab8fd7899ffec0e2984c9f7cbf0cca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Pevec
Date: Mon, 23
11 matches
Mail list logo
