Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

2016-12-11 Thread Mike McLean
Success here. Possible gotchas, depending on setup: 1) make sure your krb5.conf has: includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/ 2) if you have any custom koji config, you might need to adjust that. You need the some of the updated settings from koji.conf in the latest koji build. On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 9:46

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Koji Generates Repositories of Signed RPMs

2015-12-04 Thread Mike McLean
That is out of scope as koji will not be actually performing signing as part of this feature, just utilizing rpm signatures that have already been imported. Neat idea, but bigger problem and not really related to this On Dec 1, 2015 7:37 AM, "Petr Spacek" wrote: > On 1.12.2015 13:15, Jan Kurik wr

Re: Fedora 14 Update: lvm2-2.02.84-2.fc14

2011-06-15 Thread Mike McLean
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:39 AM, wrote: > > Fedora Update Notification > FEDORA-2011-6589 > 2011-05-07 02:13:39 > > > Name        : lvm

Re: tomboy orphaned

2011-04-28 Thread Mike McLean
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Steven Yong wrote: > I use it everyday and I am a C/C++ programmer. What is the requirement for > the role? note that tomboy is a Mono app https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers You can skip the stuff about adding your package sin

Re: Yubikeys are now supported

2010-10-07 Thread Mike McLean
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > I have one and I've played with it in fedora. There is however an important > catch. The server and the yubikey share the same AES symmetric key. This means > that if the yubikey is used for multiple sites by one user, that user is > sharing >

ssh agent issue

2010-10-01 Thread Mike McLean
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626209 Reported against F13, but I've encountered it in F14 Beta. Seems like more folks ought to be impacted by this bug that seem to be, so I wonder what is going on here. Do less folks use ssh-add that I imagine, or is some factor limiting this bug? --

Re: RFC: Remove write permissions from executables

2010-01-25 Thread Mike McLean
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Till Maas wrote: > It does not matter, whether the user is root, but whether he has the > dac_override capability. If you read the original mail (1st paragraph) > again with this in mind, you will understand the reason for the change. Thanks. Sorry for the noise.

Re: RFC: Remove write permissions from executables

2010-01-25 Thread Mike McLean
2010/1/22 Miloslav Trmač : > We can extend the protection to all executables by a simple addition to > redhat-rpm-config (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556897 ). > After applying this patch, executable files in all rebuilt packages > would not be writeable, most often using mode 0555.