Yesterday, Nov10, a set of "Final candidate" for Fedora 40 was posted.  Adam  
requested that we test it to the ends and make sure all is OK.
So, I suppose positively, that tomorrow, Friday, we will know if Fedora 40 is a 
go/nogo.

For me, as a single distro to be installed, it is ready to go. However, if you 
want a Gnome version on one drive, and a KDE version on a second drive, you may 
be out of luck.  

The problem I am experiencing is with each produced grub menu, each seems to 
prevent two Fedoras 40's from being listed within the boot menu. Not with 
workstation, the first, or the boot menu of the second (KDE).  

>From the desktop computer bios, I see both devices listed, and yes, via the 
>bios, I can boot the alternate Fedora40 version.  However, using the bios' 
>presentation in order to select the Fedora Linux to boot is wrong!!

I would use RH's bugzilla to report this issue, but right now, the Fedora 
activity is heavily focused on videos, documentation, web pages... etc.

At this time, there is no "unlimited" number of people to provide Fedora 40 
installation support. I will await post-install to see if grub.cfg can be less 
restrictive.
 


Leslie Satenstein    


PSMy confignvme0  Fedora39 
nvme1  Fedora40 Gnomesdax     Fedora KDEsdbx     Non Fedora setupsdc-sdf  
Empty,Backups, and available 1tb drives. 
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to