On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Tacking a .debug into EXTRARELEASE for the usual rawhide case might still be
>> a
>> good idea. I'll look into that tomorrow.
>
> FYI, I committed a changed to do thi this morning. It should be in tomorrow's
> rawhide and whatever kernel we
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> But I just had another variant of this idea: could the string "debug" be
>> embedded in the release string of the kernel? (and wire this up in the
>> specfile so that it's automatically added)
>>
>> so e.g.
>> kernel-3.3.0-0.rc3.git6.2.fc18
>>
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 16:38 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 15:16 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 14:40:53 -0500,
> > David Malcolm wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mi
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:38 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> My question was about "at runtime": my thinking was that it's useful to
> spell out to the user that they shouldn't expect the final released
> performance from the current system, perhaps adding a message somewhere
> in the UI, so that certa
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 15:16 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 14:40:53 -0500,
> David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > > Just seeing if it's just me, or we bac
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 14:40:53 -0500,
David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
> > > testing with the debug options a
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:40 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> > Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
>> > testing with the debug options and the kerne
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
> > testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a F16 kernel and
> > is little better than F17 3.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
> > testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a F16 kernel and
> > is little better than F17 3.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/16/2012 12:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 10:44 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again
>> during testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a
>> F16 kernel and
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 10:44 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
> testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a F16 kernel and
> is little better than F17 3.3 kernels.
'back'? Debug-enabled kernels have been extremely slow sinc
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
> testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a F16 kernel and
> is little better than F17 3.3 kernels.
the first -rc build of each kernel release has de
Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a F16 kernel and
is little better than F17 3.3 kernels.
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best little town on Earth!"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
13 matches
Mail list logo
