2010/2/11 Robert 'Bob' Jensen :
>
> - "Dan Williams" wrote:
>>
>> Oh seriously, a little communication between the Unity team and the
>> KDE
>> team wouldn't hurt here. If the Unity team said "hey, we're going to
>> do
>> a spin on March 6th" but the KDE team wanted to slip that a few days
>>
Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> Kevin this is your warning we are going to try again in a month.
When exactly? March 2? We'll see if we can get 4.4.0 out to the stable
updates by that time…
> Why shouldn't the KDE team wait 3 weeks now so that their update gets
> released about the time of our next
On Thursday 11 February 2010 11:03:52 Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> - "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
> > Sadly, this means this respin includes KDE 4.3.4 when 4.3.5 got pushed
> > to
> > stable on February 5 (in fact I queued it for stable on February 2,
> > but it
> > just missed a push and the next on
- "Jaroslav Reznik" wrote:
>
> The problem that Kevin is pointing out is - we can't watch every other
> Fedora
> projects, schedules etc. so closely - it's not just possible as it's
> big
> project and lot of people. It wouldn't hurt anybody to send quick note
> to
> k...@lists.fedoraproject
- "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
> The packages available at the time it was released. ;-) I.e. not
> preparing
> the spin 3 days before a KDE update goes out, considering that testing
> the
> spin apparently takes 9 days. But nobody at Fedora Unity ever talks to
> us
> about KDE update schedules.
- "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
>
> Sadly, this means this respin includes KDE 4.3.4 when 4.3.5 got pushed
> to
> stable on February 5 (in fact I queued it for stable on February 2,
> but it
> just missed a push and the next one was only on February 5) and 4.4.0
> is in
> the works.
>
> Somehow
- "Dan Williams" wrote:
>
> Oh seriously, a little communication between the Unity team and the
> KDE
> team wouldn't hurt here. If the Unity team said "hey, we're going to
> do
> a spin on March 6th" but the KDE team wanted to slip that a few days
> to
> get some new packages in, that woul
On Thursday 11 February 2010 04:21:10 Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:15:56AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >Mat Booth wrote:
> >> If you insist on putting out major updates for released Fedoras it
> >> will never a good time to do a re-spin. Oh well.
> >
> >The updates being pushed s
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:15:56AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>Mat Booth wrote:
>> If you insist on putting out major updates for released Fedoras it
>> will never a good time to do a re-spin. Oh well.
>
>The updates being pushed so far are bugfix releases (4.3.3, 4.3.4, 4.3.5).
>We're preparing 4
Mat Booth wrote:
> If you insist on putting out major updates for released Fedoras it
> will never a good time to do a re-spin. Oh well.
The updates being pushed so far are bugfix releases (4.3.3, 4.3.4, 4.3.5).
We're preparing 4.4.0 now, but as this isn't even in testing at the moment,
I'm not
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 01:00 +, Mat Booth wrote:
> On 11 February 2010 00:49, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Mat Booth wrote:
> >> To be fair, it seems like you are updating KDE constantly. If the spin
> >> contains the packages available at the time it was spun, I'm not sure
> >> what more you can as
On 02/10/2010 08:00 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
>
> Meh.
>
> If you insist on putting out major updates for released Fedoras it
> will never a good time to do a re-spin. Oh well.
>
I find it simpler to build my own spin anyway using mock/pungi - its
very simple - simpler in my view than dealing wi
On 11 February 2010 00:49, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Mat Booth wrote:
>> To be fair, it seems like you are updating KDE constantly. If the spin
>> contains the packages available at the time it was spun, I'm not sure
>> what more you can ask for.
>
> The packages available at the time it was released.
Mat Booth wrote:
> To be fair, it seems like you are updating KDE constantly. If the spin
> contains the packages available at the time it was spun, I'm not sure
> what more you can ask for.
The packages available at the time it was released. ;-) I.e. not preparing
the spin 3 days before a KDE up
On 10 February 2010 23:35, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ben Williams wrote:
>> The Fedora Unity Project is proud to announce the release of new ISO
>> Re-Spins of Fedora 12.
>>
>> These Re-Spin ISOs are based on the officially released Fedora 12
>> installation media and include all updates released as o
Ben Williams wrote:
> The Fedora Unity Project is proud to announce the release of new ISO
> Re-Spins of Fedora 12.
>
> These Re-Spin ISOs are based on the officially released Fedora 12
> installation media and include all updates released as of February 2nd,
> 2010.
Sadly, this means this respi
The Fedora Unity Project is proud to announce the release of new ISO
Re-Spins of Fedora 12.
These Re-Spin ISOs are based on the officially released Fedora 12
installation media and include all updates released as of February 2nd,
2010.
The ISO images are available for i386, x86_64, architectu
17 matches
Mail list logo
