Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Hau idatzi du Miro Hrončok (mhron...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2024 ots. 3(a), lr. (18:18)): > > > Package (co)maintainers > > golang-github-gatherstars-com-jwz eclipseo, go-sig > gola

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 2/3/24 12:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 4 w

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 3 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28. Since this

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2024/02/04 2:17: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 4 w

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 4 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28. Since this

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2024/01/25 1:38: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 5 w

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 02:48:19PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:25:02PM +0100, Sandro wrote: > > On 24-01-2024 17:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Dear maintainers. > > > > > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > > > package

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 05:38:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > infinipath-psm honli I think this project should be retired. The upstream repo has been archives with a message that Intel no longer supports this project. I'll rebuild mpich without this dependency. Zbyszek --

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 16:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. > > 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happe

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 17:38 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > lmms thm I fixed the build , I base it on opensuse packages https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-15-SP6/lmms?linkrev=base&rev=9 > lxc  hguemar, sag

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:25:02PM +0100, Sandro wrote: > On 24-01-2024 17:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Dear maintainers. > > > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > > packages > > should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. > > >

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 24-01-2024 17:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. yaksa    zbyszek I updated and build yaksa and c

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 1/24/24 13:05, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24. 01. 24 19:00, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Am 24.01.24 um 17:38 schrieb Miro Hrončok: Package  (co)maintainers  freefem++ (maintained by:

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:28 PM Michel Lind wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:35:09AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > > I fixed cl-asdf in Rawhide. > Mind building it in F39 and F38 too? It fails to build there and there > is one bug open for each Sure, I can do that. What we really ought to do is

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:35:09AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 9:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > > packages > > should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. > [snip] > > cl-as

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 05:53:52PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 24. 01. 24 17:50, Michel Lind wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 05:38:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Dear maintainers. > > > > > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > > > packages > > > s

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 24. 01. 24 19:00, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Am 24.01.24 um 17:38 schrieb Miro Hrončok: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hen

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 9:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. [snip] > cl-asdf green I fixed cl-asdf in Rawhide. -- Jerry

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 24. 01. 24 17:50, Michel Lind wrote: On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 05:38:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. [snip] golang-github

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 05:38:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. > [snip] > golang-github-eclesh-welford abulimov,

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 5 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28. Since this

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 9:26 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 4:09 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 29. 01. 23 18:15, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: >> > llvm11 jistone, petersen, >> sergesanspaille, tstellar >> > llvm12

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 6:47 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jens-Ulrik Petersen: > > which are still needed by various packages, the latter also including > > ghc8.10-compiler.aarch64, ghc9.0-compiler.aarch64, > > ghc9.2-compiler.s390x, and ghc9.4-compiler.s390x > > Isn't the LLVM code generator op

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

* Jens-Ulrik Petersen: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, > please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that. > > I would like to request exemptions for: > > llvm11

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 4:09 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 01. 23 18:15, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > I would like to request exemptions for: > > > > llvm11 jistone, petersen, > sergesanspaille, tstellar > > llvm12

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On 29. 01. 23 18:15, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:56 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that. I would like

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, > please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for > that. I would like to request exemptions for: llvm11 jisto

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

Dne 26. 01. 23 v 23:40 Gary Buhrmaster napsal(a): On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:08 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: Some packagers do set the bugzillas to ASSIGNED to get rid of the reminders and then they forget to actually fix the FTBFS, cannot figure out how to fix it, are blocked on externalities that

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:07:34PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Unfortunately, as seen by the lenght of the packages listed in my emails, > thsi is not always the case. Yeah. ;( > Some packagers do set the bugzillas to ASSIGNED to get rid of the reminders > and then they forget to actually fi

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:08 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Some packagers do set the bugzillas to ASSIGNED to get rid of the reminders > and > then they forget to actually fix the FTBFS, cannot figure out how to fix it, > are blocked on externalities that never happen, etc. Perhaps ASSIGNED should

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:08 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Oh but they are different. FTBFS are not urgent and the policy is only set > to > retire packages that FTBFS for more than 2 release cycles. > > For a package to be considered for retirement in February 23, it would > have to > fail to build:

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On 26. 01. 23 20:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 26. 01. 23 4:51, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 15:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retir

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 26. 01. 23 4:51, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 15:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > > > packages > > > should be retired from Fedora 38 app

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On 26. 01. 23 4:51, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 15:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the r

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 15:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. > > 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen > approximately

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On 1/25/23 13:04, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> IQmoljussilehtola > > I'm leaving this comment in case Susi (Cc) didn't get the previous > mail like last time. I know that they're working with up

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > IQmoljussilehtola I'm leaving this comment in case Susi (Cc) didn't get the previous mail like last time. I know that they're working with upstream to package the next version of IQmol, so this sho

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 2 weeks, i.e. around 2023-02-08. Since this

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:22 AM Jerry James wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 9:52 PM Jerry James wrote: > > > maven-scm mizdebsk, trawets > > > > For those affected by this, I've made a COPR with a possible > > resolution: > > https://copr.fedorainfrac

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 9:52 PM Jerry James wrote: > > maven-scm mizdebsk, trawets > > For those affected by this, I've made a COPR with a possible > resolution: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/buildnumber-maven-plugin/. > Things to note:

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 5:58 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. [snip] > maven-scm mizdebsk, trawets For those

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On 18. 01. 23 14:29, Olivier Fourdan wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 2:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: […] I've triggered the build (any packager can do that): $ koji build rawhide --nowait --fail-fast 'git+https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-drv-qxl.git#d7716591515d97b5cc4a146fbcf3ee7ca18f1

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 2:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > […] > > I've triggered the build (any packager can do that): > > $ koji build rawhide --nowait --fail-fast > 'git+https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-drv-qxl.git#d7716591515d97b5cc4a146fbcf3ee7ca18f1808' > Created task: 96293694 > Task

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On 18. 01. 23 14:16, Olivier Fourdan wrote: Hi On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 1:58 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence th

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

Hi On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 1:58 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. > > 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen > approximatel

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On 18. 01. 23 14:06, Neal Gompa wrote: ngompa: xorg-x11-drv-qxl, golang-gopkg-mgo-2 Uhh, what? Why am I associated with the QXL driver? livecd-tools -> lorax -> lorax -> anaconda -> xorg-x11-drivers -> xorg-x11-drv-qxl livecd-tools (maintained by: bcl, bruno, ngompa) python-imgcreate-sys

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 7:58 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. > > 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will hap

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 8:59 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > llvm10 petersen, sergesanspaille > Probably okay to drop at this point. > llvm11 jistone, petersen, > sergesanspaille, > tstellar > llvm12

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:59 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. > > tabbed psabata Okay

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 4:50 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > Actually… I suspect fixing that build failure would require a fix in > > the xserver from ajax [1] > > Actually, this is the fix that is needed: > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-qxl/

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Actually… I suspect fixing that build failure would require a fix in > the xserver from ajax [1] Actually, this is the fix that is needed: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-qxl/-/commit/4e1963a812f2c1777ba5d56ea9e939a3e40a0496 (This is the xf86-video-q

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:46 PM Michel Alexandre Salim < sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:58:51PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Dear maintainers. > > > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > packages > > should be retired from Fedora

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 11. 01. 23 17:52, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Il 11/01/23 13:58, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > >> sigulkevin, mitr > > > > Retiring this would blow up Fedora infrastructure... the FTB/FTI is >

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 11. 01. 23 17:52, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Il 11/01/23 13:58, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: sigulkevin, mitr Retiring this would blow up Fedora infrastructure... the FTB/FTI is being worked on, but it depends on python-nss to be un-retired and the

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed Jan 11, 2023 at 13:58 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > golang-github-d2g-dhcp4servereclipseo, go-sig I need a package review to fix this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160202 -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed Jan 11, 2023 at 13:58 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. > golang-github-gin-gonic eclipseo, go-sig I've fixed this:

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Il 11/01/23 13:58, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > sigulkevin, mitr Retiring this would blow up Fedora infrastructure... the FTB/FTI is being worked on, but it depends on python-nss to be un-retired and the package review for that is in progress (just approve

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:58:51PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. > > 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 2023-01-11 04:58, Miro Hrončok wrote: golang-helm-3go-sig, orphan I'll take another stab at updating this one over the weekend. libv3270 dcavalca Will fix this, thanks for the heads up. Cheers Davide ___

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:02 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Kalev Lember wrote on 2023/01/12 0:03: > > Hi Mamoru, > > > > Out of curiosity, why? Do you actually need libgnome? I was hoping it > would > > get removed this cycle so we can finally stop shipping the old gnome 2 > > library stack. > > > >

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Kalev Lember wrote on 2023/01/12 0:03: On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:51 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote on 2023/01/11 21:58: libgnome alexl, caolanm, gnome-sig, mbarnes, rhughes, rstrode, I'v

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:51 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Miro Hrončok wrote on 2023/01/11 21:58: > > libgnome alexl, caolanm, > gnome-sig, > > mbarnes, rhughes, > rstrode, > > I've just fixed now: > https://ko

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:53 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > Hi Fabio, > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:32 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > > > > > We could just remove xorg-x11-drv-qxl from the list of drivers pulled > > > in from xorg-x11-

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 11. 01. 23 15:51, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote on 2023/01/11 21:58: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Hi Fabio, On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:32 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > > > We could just remove xorg-x11-drv-qxl from the list of drivers pulled > > in from xorg-x11-drivers, wdyt? > > Aren't QXL the default graphics when setting up a Fedo

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2023/01/11 21:58: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 5

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 03:31:46PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > > > We could just remove xorg-x11-drv-qxl from the list of drivers pulled > > in from xorg-x11-drivers, wdyt? > > Aren't QXL the default graphics when setting up a Fedora

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > We could just remove xorg-x11-drv-qxl from the list of drivers pulled > in from xorg-x11-drivers, wdyt? Aren't QXL the default graphics when setting up a Fedora VM with libvirt (i.e. gnome-boxes and virt-manager)? Maybe letting that drive

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 11. 01. 23 15:02, Vít Ondruch wrote: I would not ask if this was true... Sorry, my fault, I brainfarted. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Hi Miro, On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 11. 01. 23 13:58, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Dear maintainers. > > > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > > packages > > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dne 11. 01. 23 v 14:40 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 11. 01. 23 14:34, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 11. 01. 23 v 13:58 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): coffee-script patches, vondruch Could you please exclude this ^^ from the list? I am afraid I can't exclude packages just like that. If you believe this

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 11. 01. 23 14:34, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 11. 01. 23 v 13:58 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): coffee-script patches, vondruch Could you please exclude this ^^ from the list? I am afraid I can't exclude packages just like that. If you believe this package should be exempted from the policy I woul

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dne 11. 01. 23 v 13:58 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): coffee-script patches, vondruch Could you please exclude this ^^ from the list? While this package is on life support, removing it won't make the situation any better :/ There also was rename/update attempt which was deferred for the time being

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

W dniu 11.01.2023 o 13:58 Miro Hrončok pisze: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. > zyga: zmk, golang-gopkg-mgo-2 Thank you for reminding me. I will addr

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 11. 01. 23 13:58, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. ... Depending on: xorg-x11-drv-qxl (16), status change: 2020-04-02 (144 weeks ago)

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 20. 01. 21 14:15, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: I'd like sugar-view-slides and sugar-visualmatch to be exempted as I'm working on both. Note that sugar-visualmatch was already retired when we had this conversation, because it was orphaned for 6+ weeks. No idea why it was still part of the rep

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 20. 01. 21 17:50, Tom Callaway wrote: Looks like VirtualGL was rebuilt: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=14293 Yes, known. It will be no longer listed in the report next week. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phon

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Looks like VirtualGL was rebuilt: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=14293 ~spot On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > packages > will be retired from Fedora 34 ap

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 20. 01. 21 14:23, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: Yes I expect to have it done during the Fedora 34 release cycle. OK, I won't bother FESCo with an exception request and will simply postpone the two retirements. Note that they will still be included in reports. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Yes I expect to have it done during the Fedora 34 release cycle. -- Ibiam Chihurumnaya ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 20. 01. 21 14:15, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > > I'd like sugar-view-slides and sugar-visualmatch to be exempted as I'm

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 20. 01. 21 14:15, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: I'd like sugar-view-slides and sugar-visualmatch to be exempted as I'm working on both. When do you expect to have it done? E.g. is it during the Fedora 34 release cycle? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

I'd like sugar-view-slides and sugar-visualmatch to be exempted as I'm working on both. -- Ibiam Chihurumnaya ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 9:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > packag

Re: VirtualGL - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 19. 01. 21 15:52, Raphael Groner wrote: Hi Miro, please try to keep VirtualGL alive. There's actual activity for this package and new builds got pushed into updates-testing. We succesfully managed to fix FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863126 That is enough to keep it a

VirtualGL - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Hi Miro, please try to keep VirtualGL alive. There's actual activity for this package and new builds got pushed into updates-testing. We succesfully managed to fix FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863126 No idea about those sugar packages though. Thanks & Regards, Raphael

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Hi. VirtualGL is built in rawhide and in testing for f33/f32. Thanks. On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:24 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > packages > will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branchi

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branching (February 2021). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ Note that s

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branching (February 2021). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ Note that s

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branching (February 2021). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ Note that s

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 09:56:55PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branching > (February 2021). > > Policy: > https://docs.fedoraproject

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branching (February 2021). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ Note that s

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 15:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > packages > will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branching > (February > 2021). > > Policy: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branching (February 2021). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ Note that s

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 06. 01. 20 23:41, Peter Jones wrote: On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 02:48:22PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote: If you don't have the time to make a new build once every year, you shouldn't be a packager, full stop. I think that's a fair point, but not at all the issue here. I specifically want not

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the latest fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching (2020-02-03). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The packages in

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, 2020-01-15 at 20:59 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 11:44:31AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > Also said in the e-mail, if you think those packages need to be exempted > > > from > > > the process, we can deal with that to, however there must be a valid > > > reaso

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 11:44:31AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > Also said in the e-mail, if you think those packages need to be exempted > > from > > the process, we can deal with that to, however there must be a valid > > reason. I > > don't think "the maintainer didn't actually maintain

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the latest fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching (February 2020). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The packages

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 1/6/20 2:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 04:57:16PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote: In general, you're not considering that it may be worth having policies reflect our *ideal* situation, and acknowledge that they don't always fit the real world precisely. That last thing seems

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 05:41:53PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 02:48:22PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote: > > > If you don't have the time to make a new build once every year, you > > shouldn't be a packager, full stop. > > I think that's a fair point, but not at all the issu

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 17:27 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 4:58 PM Peter Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:54:58PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > Regardless of different opinions about aggressiveness, having policies > > > and no enforcement makes no sense. Eith

  1   2   >