On Thursday, September 5, 2019 11:33:58 PM MST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 06. 09. 19 v 3:29 John Harris napsal(a):
>
> > Well, that could be much better handled with a simple "Contact owner"
> > button that sends the owner an email.
>
>
> We have this for ages. See upper right corner of:
> h
Dne 06. 09. 19 v 3:29 John Harris napsal(a):
> Well, that could be much better handled with a simple "Contact owner" button
> that sends the owner an email.
We have this for ages. See upper right corner of:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/mock/mock/
And no, it does not work. People do
On Thursday, September 5, 2019 10:16:16 AM MST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 9/5/19 9:55 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 09:17:49AM -0700, John Harris wrote:
> >> Does the inefficiency of that feature outweigh its usefulness? Why does
> >> it
> >> rely on Discourse for that feature?
John Harris wrote:
> Does the inefficiency of that feature outweigh its usefulness? Why does it
> rely on Discourse for that feature?
What is particularly annoying is that it is all in JavaScript. Basic website
functionality should work without JavaScript.
(But there are already other offenders
On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 2:28:08 PM CEST Dominik Turecek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today, we have released a new version of Copr.
> Main highlights from the release was the addition
> of discussion panels in Copr projects and speed
> optimization of front page.
>
> F
If I understand the discussion here:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/can-the-copr-category-be-removed-from-the-latest-list/2420
Alot of the traffic can be dealt with using the "do not list this category
in latest" function - and there will be an RFE for the "new" category. The
one
thing th
On 9/5/19 9:55 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 09:17:49AM -0700, John Harris wrote:
>> Does the inefficiency of that feature outweigh its usefulness? Why does it
>> rely on Discourse for that feature?
>
> I think it's pretty clearly a useful feature, although I won't speak to
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 09:17:49AM -0700, John Harris wrote:
> Does the inefficiency of that feature outweigh its usefulness? Why does it
> rely on Discourse for that feature?
I think it's pretty clearly a useful feature, although I won't speak to any
inefficiency. And I'm glad to see that it _do
On Thursday, September 5, 2019 6:56:13 AM MST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Between them, between the maintainer as they very
> often contact us to do something with the content of the projects or file
> bug reports against Copr to do something with a failing application built
> in Copr. And we are closi
Dne 04. 09. 19 v 18:17 John Harris napsal(a):
> Has the new version been tested without "discussion"s? If not, I would
> imagine
> it'd be much faster with that feature disabled.
Yes. It has been tested with and without discussions. Discussion are not on
front pages and does not affect loading
On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 5:28:08 AM MST Dominik Turecek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today, we have released a new version of Copr.
> Main highlights from the release was the addition
> of discussion panels in Copr projects and speed
> optimization of front page.
>
> F
Dne 04. 09. 19 v 14:44 Kamil Paral napsal(a):
>
> The discussion page is a neat idea. For some projects, I see "start
> discussion" button, but for others, I see just
> "Loading Discussion..." that eventually changes to "Error embedding".
Yes, the loading takes too long when the topic has to be
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:29 PM Dominik Turecek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today, we have released a new version of Copr.
> Main highlights from the release was the addition
> of discussion panels in Copr projects and speed
> optimization of front page.
>
The discussion page is
Hello.
Today, we have released a new version of Copr.
Main highlights from the release was the addition
of discussion panels in Copr projects and speed
optimization of front page.
For more information, see:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4aca9d983d
Dominik
Hi Mirek,
I am seeing copr builds failing on ppc64le with this in root.log:
DEBUG util.py:377: ERROR: can't perform the search - Inappropriate
ioctl for device
DEBUG util.py:377: ERROR: can't get rootid for '/var/lib/mock'
DEBUG util.py:488: Child return code was: 1
Full log here:
https://co
On 08/12/2015 11:50 AM, Johnny Robeson wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 10:31 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
It is my pleasure to announce that we just upgraded
https://copr.fedoraproject.org
It includes several major improvements:
* UI converted to PatternFly [1]. Most visible change is that tab
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 10:31 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> It is my pleasure to announce that we just upgraded
> https://copr.fedoraproject.org
>
> It includes several major improvements:
>
> * UI converted to PatternFly [1]. Most visible change is that tables
> (e.g. list of builds) can be sor
It is my pleasure to announce that we just upgraded
https://copr.fedoraproject.org
It includes several major improvements:
* UI converted to PatternFly [1]. Most visible change is that tables
(e.g. list of builds) can be sorted using any column and you can filter
visible rows using any value.
It is my pleasure to announce that we just upgraded
https://copr.fedoraproject.org
It includes several major improvements:
* UI converted to PatternFly [1]. Most visible change is that tables
(e.g. list of builds) can be sorted using any column and you can filter
visible rows using any value.
On 01/28/2014 06:01 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> Are there plans to add ARM?
It is my wish as well. My plan is to talk on upcoming DevConf.cz to several
people if/how it can be done.
Additionally I'm in contact with Dan Horak from Secondary Arch team and we may
get PPC builders. But the horizon
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> Hi,
> I just deployed new version of Copr.
>
> Changes:
> * copr-cli has been build for epel6 (no planned build for el5 due
> dependency on python-requests)
> * you should see less internal server errors. Especially
Hi,
I just deployed new version of Copr.
Changes:
* copr-cli has been build for epel6 (no planned build for el5 due
dependency on python-requests)
* you should see less internal server errors. Especially when deleting
tasks with multiple srpm
* All packages produced by Copr now have as vendor
On 01/13/2014 03:26 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
I just deployed new version of Copr at:
Hi Miroslav,
I just tried Copr. Very nice!
1. +1 for armhfp arch! (On my mind b/c I've just spent a while
playing with Fedora chroots on a Samsung Galaxy Note 8.)
2. It would be very convenie
On 01/14/2014 01:09 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 03:26 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
>> > I just deployed new version of Copr at:
>> > http://copr.fedoraproject.org
>> >
>> > It have only one feature: you can now build in epel-7-x86_64!
>&g
On 01/13/2014 03:26 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> I just deployed new version of Copr at:
> http://copr.fedoraproject.org
>
> It have only one feature: you can now build in epel-7-x86_64!
>
> To be precise - the name "epel" is little bit misleading, because it is righ
I just deployed new version of Copr at:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org
It have only one feature: you can now build in epel-7-x86_64!
To be precise - the name "epel" is little bit misleading, because it is
right now based on RHEL 7 Beta and does not include EPEL repo, because
i
26 matches
Mail list logo
