Re: No retiring of packages with broken deps for Fedora 26

2017-07-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 04:21:31PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Thank you Till for the hard work on this. I wonder if it would be > better to retire these packages at branching from now on? That way we > never had to deal with worrying about composes not working > afterwords.. because we kn

Re: No retiring of packages with broken deps for Fedora 26

2017-07-04 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Thank you Till for the hard work on this. I wonder if it would be better to retire these packages at branching from now on? That way we never had to deal with worrying about composes not working afterwords.. because we know they probably won't work until fixed. On 4 July 2017 at 16:12, Till Maas

Re: No retiring of packages with broken deps for Fedora 26

2017-07-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 10:12:55PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > since there were too many packages with broken dependencies and we lack > the tooling to properly identify which packages can be safely retired > without endangering the final compose, the current packages with broken > dependencies will

No retiring of packages with broken deps for Fedora 26

2017-07-04 Thread Till Maas
Hi, since there were too many packages with broken dependencies and we lack the tooling to properly identify which packages can be safely retired without endangering the final compose, the current packages with broken dependencies will not be retired for Fedora 26. We are going to rework the clean