On 2011-01-27, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2011-01-27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> So is Perl still broken? I'm getting lots of emails like:
>>
>> vhostmd-0.4-11.fc14.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/perl
>> vhostmd-0.4-11.fc14.x86_64 requires perl(strict)
>>
> I've just got bunch of e-ma
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 01/27/2011 09:51 PM +9:00:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:04:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Yes, perl was broken. I have untagged it and notified the maintainer
>> (who was already looking at it).
>>
>> Things should work again as soon as the buildroot rebuilds.
>
> So
On 2011-01-27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> So is Perl still broken? I'm getting lots of emails like:
>
> vhostmd-0.4-11.fc14.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/perl
> vhostmd-0.4-11.fc14.x86_64 requires perl(strict)
>
I've just got bunch of e-mails perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2) is not
provi
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:04:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yes, perl was broken. I have untagged it and notified the maintainer
> (who was already looking at it).
>
> Things should work again as soon as the buildroot rebuilds.
So is Perl still broken? I'm getting lots of emails like:
