Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-22 Thread Kévin Raymond
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:09:47AM +0100, Kévin Raymond wrote: >> [D] hivex >> [D] virttop  [virt-top] > > [...] > >> [D] means the source language has not been updated for a long time (set >> to 4 months). It is against all resources o

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:09:47AM +0100, Kévin Raymond wrote: > [D] hivex > [D] virttop [virt-top] [...] > [D] means the source language has not been updated for a long time (set > to 4 months). It is against all resources on one project. 4 months is > quite revelent. Those two projects are st

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Dimitris Glezos
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > We need (and in fact > every Open Source project should require) proper attribution for the > patches we merge into our projects, and that means that commits are > properly split up. Hey Lennart, I feel commits are not the best way to

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:20:32 +0100 Alan Pevec wrote: > Semi-related question: what's the procedure to get new language team > approved on transifex? BTW, Aeolus Image Warehouse had to dump Transifex. It was impossible to build anything without having an account there, and that was unacceptable,

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread David Cantrell
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:38:05PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 21.02.12 02:09, Kévin Raymond (shai...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > Heya, > > > It tooks me few hours as this is my first python script :) > > I've managed to get the whole list of transifex.net projec

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Petr Pisar
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:50:34AM +0800, Cheng-Chia Tseng wrote: > News from Lennart Poettering, comment on PulseAudio translation: > > "We disabled the Transifex hookup when Tx stopped to apply changes in > separate commits to git. We need proper attribution of translation changes, > and that al

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 21.02.12 02:09, Kévin Raymond (shai...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > Hi guys, Heya, > It tooks me few hours as this is my first python script :) > I've managed to get the whole list of transifex.net projects who appears > dead, here they are: > > (see bellow for the explaination) > @deve

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Kévin Raymond
Le mardi 21 févr. 2012 à 12:05:01 (+0100), Petr Pisar a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:15:41AM +0100, Kévin Raymond wrote: > > you NEED to sign the Disclaimer with the FSF… > > This is not true. The disclaimer is required only for FSF projects becuase the > disclaimer is demanded by proje

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:15:41AM +0100, Kévin Raymond wrote: > you NEED to sign the Disclaimer with the FSF… This is not true. The disclaimer is required only for FSF projects becuase the disclaimer is demanded by project maintainer, not by Translation Project infrastructure. -- Petr pgpQIn

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Kévin Raymond
Le mardi 21 févr. 2012 à 10:46:35 (+0100), Jim Meyering a écrit : > ... > > [D] iwhd > > I deliberately switched iwhd from transifex to http://translationproject.org > because the latter provides anonymous rsync access, while transifex requires > that one register and use an account merely to dow

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Kévin Raymond
Le mardi 21 févr. 2012 à 10:20:32 (+0100), Alan Pevec a écrit : > > Semi-related question: what's the procedure to get new language team > approved on transifex? > I see few teams hanging in requested state at > https://fedora.transifex.net/projects/p/fedora/ They have probably not done all nece

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Jim Meyering
Kévin Raymond wrote: > I've managed to get the whole list of transifex.net projects who appears > dead, here they are: ... > [D] iwhd I deliberately switched iwhd from transifex to http://translationproject.org because the latter provides anonymous rsync access, while transifex requires that one r

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-21 Thread Alan Pevec
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Kévin Raymond wrote: > I've managed to get the whole list of transifex.net projects Semi-related question: what's the procedure to get new language team approved on transifex? I see few teams hanging in requested state at https://fedora.transifex.net/projects/p/fe

Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

2012-02-20 Thread Kévin Raymond
Hi guys, It tooks me few hours as this is my first python script :) I've managed to get the whole list of transifex.net projects who appears dead, here they are: (see bellow for the explaination) @devel, if your project is named there, please get in touch with us [D] avahi [D] expendable [M] fe