Le Mer 23 janvier 2013 10:31, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 20:31 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> But do not try to wake it up by pressing num lock twice fast. It
>> should be
>> a noop but you can hit a gnome race and hose the system
>
> That was fixed a couple of months ago.
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 20:31 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> But do not try to wake it up by pressing num lock twice fast. It
> should be
> a noop but you can hit a gnome race and hose the system
That was fixed a couple of months ago. Please replace with up-to-date
complaints.
commit 15baf34186c6b
Le Dim 20 janvier 2013 06:46, David Tardon a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 03:20:29PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 19.1.2013 12:46, Tomasz Torcz napsal(a):
>> >On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> >>On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 02:25:51PM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > oh yeah quickly check a personal instant message without unlock
> > whoever have desigend this is naive and has no idea about privacy
> To be fair, this is exactly the reason why it is disabled by default and
> has to be enabled b
* Reindl Harald [19/01/2013 23:27] :
>
> oh yeah quickly check a personal instant message without unlock
> whoever have desigend this is naive and has no idea about privacy
To be fair, this is exactly the reason why it is disabled by default and
has to be enabled by the user.
Emmanuel
--
devel m
Am 19.01.2013 23:08, schrieb Peter Gordon:
> On 01/18/2013 04:12 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> So, I do not at all share the snarky sentiment, but this still perplexes me.
>>
>> What is that screen for? It literally took me a minute to figure out what to
>> do with it the first time I saw it, and
gt;>
>> BTW you can show notifications on the screen, so even without login
>> you can be informed that you have new message, or what your payer is
>> playing ATM, etc.
>
> And why should I need that?
>
> D.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproje
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 03:20:29PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 19.1.2013 12:46, Tomasz Torcz napsal(a):
> >On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >>On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >>
> >>>I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a p
On 01/18/2013 04:12 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> So, I do not at all share the snarky sentiment, but this still perplexes me.
>
> What is that screen for? It literally took me a minute to figure out what to
> do with it the first time I saw it, and then every time after that it just
> gets in the w
Dne 19.1.2013 12:46, Tomasz Torcz napsal(a):
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the display
wakes up, that must be "swiped" away in order to
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:46:35PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the
> > > display
> > > wakes up, that must be "swiped" away in order to unlock the desktop.
> > I just hit "Enter" or "Return" to achieve the same.
> Or "Esc".
It
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> > I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the display
> > wakes up, that must be "swiped" away in order to unlock the desktop.
>
> I just hit
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the display
> wakes up, that must be "swiped" away in order to unlock the desktop.
I just hit "Enter" or "Return" to achieve the same.
--
Fedora release 18 (Spherical Co
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:10:06PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Andy Lawrence writes:
>
> >Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank
> >you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you!
>
> Agreed. This also seems to be a convenient place to add my own
>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hey,guys...
>
> Will there have a MATE spin later?
>
> Thanks...
>
>
> --
>
>
> Yours sincerely,
> Christopher Meng
Yes.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/18/2013 06:12 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> What is that screen for? It literally took me a minute to figure out what to
> do with it the first time I saw it, and then every time after that it just
> gets in the way of what I want to do. Why *can't* I turn it off?
It's part of the nefarious ma
Matthew Miller writes:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:13:16PM -0600, Dan Mashal wrote:
> You're welcome.
> It's not happening.
So, I do not at all share the snarky sentiment, but this still perplexes me.
What is that screen for? It literally took me a minute to figure out what to
do with it the fi
Hey,guys...
Will there have a MATE spin later?
Thanks...
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Got problems with Windows? - ReBoot
Got problems with Linux? - Be Root
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:13:16PM -0600, Dan Mashal wrote:
> You're welcome.
> It's not happening.
So, I do not at all share the snarky sentiment, but this still perplexes me.
What is that screen for? It literally took me a minute to figure out what to
do with it the first time I saw it, and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:10:06PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the
>display wakes up, that must be "swiped" away in order to unlock the
>desktop. Somehow (and this would be the snarky
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Andy Lawrence writes:
>
>> Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you
>> Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you!
>
>
> Agreed. This also seems to be a convenient place to add my own snarky
> c
Andy Lawrence writes:
Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank
you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you!
Agreed. This also seems to be a convenient place to add my own snarky
comment, that doesn't really merit its own thread.
I see that Gnom
Hi
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Andy Lawrence wrote:
>
> Not to start a war, but I sincerely hope Mate makes it into RHEL 7 vs
> Gnome. I have WAY too many machines riding on it.
>
Unlikely that MATE will be part of EL. If you depend on it, I would
suggest getting it into EPEL
Rahul
--
Mate package maintainers, testers and any developers on the dev list:
Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank
you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you!
Not to start a war, but I sincerely hope Mate makes it into RHEL 7 vs
Gnome. I have WAY too man
24 matches
Mail list logo
