Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-31 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 23:41, Sandro wrote: Thanks for sparring! Whatever the outcome, I'll report here and on discussion. As promised, here is the outcome of a lengthy investigation. While I was on the right track right from the start, I failed to recognize (something about moving parts, some trees and

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-28 Thread Sandro
On 12/28/23 00:47, Sandro wrote: On 12/28/23 00:04, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 12/27/23 08:20, Sandro wrote: I added `level` and `num-devices` to all entries in mdadm.conf and rebooted. It didn't change anything. Manual assembly still freezes the system as well. You need to also update the initram

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-28 Thread Paul Howarth
On Wed, 27 Dec 2023 15:05:29 +0100 Sandro wrote: > I could you use some help with ${SUBJECT}. I posted the details in > discussion [1], but have yet to receive a response. I thought maybe > folks on the list may have an idea. > > I'm kinda lost as to where this is going wrong. Feel free to rep

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/28/23 00:04, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 12/27/23 08:20, Sandro wrote: I added `level` and `num-devices` to all entries in mdadm.conf and rebooted. It didn't change anything. Manual assembly still freezes the system as well. You need to also update the initramfs using dracut or the modified md

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 12/27/23 15:12, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 12/27/23 06:05, Sandro wrote: I could you use some help with ${SUBJECT}. I posted the details in discussion [1], but have yet to receive a response. I thought maybe folks on the list may have an idea. I'm kinda lost as to where this is going wrong. Fee

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 12/27/23 06:05, Sandro wrote: I could you use some help with ${SUBJECT}. I posted the details in discussion [1], but have yet to receive a response. I thought maybe folks on the list may have an idea. I'm kinda lost as to where this is going wrong. Feel free to reply either on discussion o

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 12/27/23 08:20, Sandro wrote: I added `level` and `num-devices` to all entries in mdadm.conf and rebooted. It didn't change anything. Manual assembly still freezes the system as well. You need to also update the initramfs using dracut or the modified mdadm.conf won't be available at boot.

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 22:48, pgnd wrote: without seeing all the details, unfound superblocks aren't good. But isn't the information `mdadm --examine` prints coming from the superblock stored on the device? The magic number, that this command reports, matches what was expected (a92b4efc). I can access t

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 17:36, Sandro wrote: I'll try with a F39 live ISO as well. If nothing else, it could confirm the issue to be with/in F39. I did that. Right after boot only one of the arrays was assembled. In /proc/mdstat is was listed as "active (auto-read-only)" and the component devices matched

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 17:28, pgnd wrote: WAG? https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=wild%20ass%20guess ;) I should have guessed... I added `level` and `num-devices` to all entries in mdadm.conf and rebooted. It didn't change anything. Manual assembly still freezes the system as well. hm

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 17:03, pgnd wrote: also make sure your drivers are in the initrd lsinitrd | grep -Ei "kernel/drivers/md/raid" -rw-r--r-- 1 root root10228 Nov 15 19:00 usr/lib/modules/6.6.8-200.fc39.x86_64/kernel/drivers/md/raid0.ko.xz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root35376 Nov 15 1

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 17:10, pgnd wrote: If it works, I'd still wonder why md54 comes up fine. That entry is also missing `level` and `num-devices`. 1st WAG ? WAG? /dev/md/54 is 'just' raid1, without an atypical spare It's not. It's a raid5 without any spare just like md5. Only difference between

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 16:47, pgnd wrote: i explicitly add the level= num-devices i've had issues long ago with mis-assembly that that cured. whether it's STILL a problem, i don't know; all my array spec contain contain these, and don't cause harm. it's now SOP here. i'd at least conside

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 15:14, pgnd wrote: what's the output of: mdadm -Es cat /etc/mdadm.conf # mdadm -Es ARRAY /dev/md/5 metadata=1.1 UUID=39295d93:e5a75797:b72287f3:51563755 name=urras.penguinpee.nl:5 ARRAY /dev/md/1 metadata=1.1 UUID=4a2c44b5:25f2a6c9:0e7f6cae:37a8a9cc name=urras.penguinpe

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 15:05, Sandro wrote: I could you use some help with ${SUBJECT}. I posted the details in discussion [1], but have yet to receive a response. I thought maybe folks on the list may have an idea. I'm kinda lost as to where this is going wrong. Feel free to reply either on discussion or h

Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
I could you use some help with ${SUBJECT}. I posted the details in discussion [1], but have yet to receive a response. I thought maybe folks on the list may have an idea. I'm kinda lost as to where this is going wrong. Feel free to reply either on discussion or here. I'd appreciate any help I