Owen Taylor writes:
> For years, Red Hat Linux / Fedora systems have had a umask of 0002 for
> regular users as part of the "user private group" scheme [*]. Basically the
> idea is that
> you can set a directory group-sticky and use it as a common work area for a
> group of users.
>
> A chang
On Sun, 22 May 2022 at 06:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 10:30:48AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 21/05/2022 20:57, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > > I think Fedora should go use an 0077 umask for this reason.
> >
> > Fedora is a general purpose dis
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 10:30:48AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 21/05/2022 20:57, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > I think Fedora should go use an 0077 umask for this reason.
>
> Fedora is a general purpose distribution, so umask 0077 will create more
> problems than it solves.
>
> Al
On 21/05/2022 03:00, Neal Gompa wrote:
I think we should complete the transition to 0022 umask.
+1 to 0022.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 21/05/2022 20:57, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
I think Fedora should go use an 0077 umask for this reason.
Fedora is a general purpose distribution, so umask 0077 will create more
problems than it solves.
Also by default the /home directories have 0700 chmod so no one but the
owner can acce
On 5/20/22 21:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 9:08 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 8:13 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>> For years, Red Hat Linux / Fedora systems have had a umask of 0002 for
>>> regular users as part of the "user private group" scheme [*].
Owen,
Thanks for explaining the situation with umask. I'd noticed the
discrepancy between login/non-login shells and wondered what was
going on.
>It seems like we need to do one of two things:
>
> - Go back to the old behavior, maybe by using the usergroups option to
>pam_umask and removing the
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 9:08 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 8:13 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
> >
> > For years, Red Hat Linux / Fedora systems have had a umask of 0002 for
> > regular users as part of the "user private group" scheme [*]. Basically the
> > idea is that you can set a
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 8:13 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> For years, Red Hat Linux / Fedora systems have had a umask of 0002 for
> regular users as part of the "user private group" scheme [*]. Basically the
> idea is that you can set a directory group-sticky and use it as a common work
> area for
For years, Red Hat Linux / Fedora systems have had a umask of 0002 for
regular users as part of the "user private group" scheme [*]. Basically the
idea is that you can set a directory group-sticky and use it as a common
work area for a group of users.
A change a couple of years ago seems to have p
10 matches
Mail list logo
