Hi,
On 8/4/20 2:29 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
ok. I did what I could with the resources we have right now to improve
things on the s390x builders.
1. I noticed that we had the kvm instances oversubscribed on cpus (the
host has 32, we had 42 used). So, I lowered all the kvm builders to 3
vcpus from
On 8/3/20 6:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
ok. I did what I could with the resources we have right now to improve
things on the s390x builders.
I've been watching it for the last hour or so and so far 0 failures that
I can attribute to s390x cache or builder infra.
Hopefully that should make thin
ok. I did what I could with the resources we have right now to improve
things on the s390x builders.
1. I noticed that we had the kvm instances oversubscribed on cpus (the
host has 32, we had 42 used). So, I lowered all the kvm builders to 3
vcpus from 4. (Those are 15-24).
2. I moved the varni
