On 01/11/2012 10:11 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:03:39AM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> Odd as it is, IP6 reduces privacy - it was not designed with privacy
>> in mind.
>
> http://ipv6int.net/systems/linux-ipv6.html#privacy
>
Good point thank you - indeed that h
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:03:39AM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 09:21 AM, Emanuel Rietveld wrote:
> > On 01/11/2012 12:43 PM, Richard wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:53:52PM +0100, nodata wrote:
> >>
> >>> Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here:
> >>> http://panopt
On 01/11/2012 09:21 AM, Emanuel Rietveld wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 12:43 PM, Richard wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:53:52PM +0100, nodata wrote:
>>
>>> Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here:
>>> http://panopticlick.eff.org/
>
> Maybe I am missing something, but isn't this only releva
Am 11.01.2012 15:21, schrieb Emanuel Rietveld:
> On 01/11/2012 12:43 PM, Richard wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:53:52PM +0100, nodata wrote:
>>
>>> Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here:
>>> http://panopticlick.eff.org/
>
> Maybe I am missing something, but isn't this only releva
On 01/11/2012 12:43 PM, Richard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:53:52PM +0100, nodata wrote:
Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here:
http://panopticlick.eff.org/
Maybe I am missing something, but isn't this only relevant if your IP is
not visible to the web server? Otherwise, you
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:53:52PM +0100, nodata wrote:
>
> Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here:
> http://panopticlick.eff.org/
that apparently can be worked around at least partially with noscript but the
user
agent string is insanely revealing (I do not even use lynx most of the
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 22:50:53 +0100,
Richard wrote:
>
> the privacy issue is a topic for Fedora because Fedora desktop users
> have a substantial disadvantage compared to users of more frequently
> used desktops. Intercepting a Fedora version string will in most
> regions of the world ide
nodata (l...@nodata.co.uk) said:
> Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here:
> http://panopticlick.eff.org/
>
> Privacy conscious users are able to install a user agent switching
> extension.
... which (at least according to the referenced paper there) makes you
actually *more* trackable
On Tue 10 Jan 2012 22:50:53 CET, Richard wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:24:14PM +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
>
>> Why is that a topic for fedora? I don't think, we should patch
>> programs and remove the versions printing everywhere. You are free to
>> discuss this with upstream and that's it (o
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:24:14PM +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
> Why is that a topic for fedora? I don't think, we should patch
> programs and remove the versions printing everywhere. You are free to
> discuss this with upstream and that's it (or do a foo-privacy fork of
> course ;)).
the privacy
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 10.01.2012 00:13, schrieb Richard:
>> many of the different user agent and service banners are way
>> too detailed for my taste
>
> thank you for supporting my opinion that a software should
> per default disclose as less informations as
Am 10.01.2012 00:13, schrieb Richard:
> many of the different user agent and service banners are way
> too detailed for my taste
thank you for supporting my opinion that a software should
per default disclose as less informations as possible
SAMBA is currently my hate candidate in a LAN
Nessus/
Hi,
many of the different user agent and service banners are way too detailed
for my taste.
It sucks privacy wise - disclosing Fedora version, CPU, kernel version,
browser version and a few other details mindlessly included in many user
agent/service banners would in many cases allow near foolp
13 matches
Mail list logo
