[Server-devel] CONNECTIVITY

2010-11-10 Thread Dudley Daduwe
Hi, I am a new tech in the olpc deploymeny in Papua New Guinea. I have installed a server which works fine, however could not connect using XO laptops. I realized that during the bootup stages, it fails during the "IP determining information on eth0.Fails. Note that I do have ONLY one NIC whi

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-10 Thread Sameer Verma
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi all, > > OLPC Engineering had a trip to Taipei for the XO-1.75 motherboard > bringup last week.  The 1.75 machine lives in the same industrial > design (display, case, batteries) as the XO-1/XO-1.5, but uses an > ARM system-on-chip from Marve

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-10 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi all, > > OLPC Engineering had a trip to Taipei for the XO-1.75 motherboard > bringup last week.  The 1.75 machine lives in the same industrial > design (display, case, batteries) as the XO-1/XO-1.5, but uses an > ARM system-on-chip from Marve

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-10 Thread Ed McNierney
Mikus - Well, there's a reason Linus called them BogoMips, isn't there? - Ed On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > I notice in the dmesg printout that the BogoMips for this initial > XO-1.75 version is less than for the G1G1 XO-1. > > mikus > >

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-10 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, > I notice in the dmesg printout that the BogoMips for this initial > XO-1.75 version is less than for the G1G1 XO-1. BogoMIPS, of course, being the ultimate measure of CPU performance.. The most obvious reason why this isn't a meaningful comparison, which isn't to say that there aren'

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-10 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
I notice in the dmesg printout that the BogoMips for this initial XO-1.75 version is less than for the G1G1 XO-1. mikus ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-10 Thread C. Scott Ananian
Hey, that looks a lot like the conference rooms *I've* been spending weeks in! ;-) --scott --                          ( http://cscott.net/ ) ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-10 Thread Bert Freudenberg
Yay! - Bert - On 10.11.2010, at 22:01, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi all, > > OLPC Engineering had a trip to Taipei for the XO-1.75 motherboard > bringup last week. The 1.75 machine lives in the same industrial > design (display, case, batteries) as the XO-1/XO-1.5, but uses an > ARM system-on-chip f

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-10 Thread Walter Bender
Congrats!! -walter On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi all, > > OLPC Engineering had a trip to Taipei for the XO-1.75 motherboard > bringup last week.  The 1.75 machine lives in the same industrial > design (display, case, batteries) as the XO-1/XO-1.5, but uses an > ARM syst

XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-10 Thread Chris Ball
Hi all, OLPC Engineering had a trip to Taipei for the XO-1.75 motherboard bringup last week. The 1.75 machine lives in the same industrial design (display, case, batteries) as the XO-1/XO-1.5, but uses an ARM system-on-chip from Marvell -- the Armada 610/MMP2. There's still a great deal of drive

Re: xorg.conf.d and Sisusb

2010-11-10 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > I'm working on switching us over to the new xorg.conf.d system for F14 Interesting. I'm swamped ATM, may take a couple of days to look into this in detail. At a quick glance, seems to make sense (wih the minor note that I'll be disabling DPMS