Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: s2mps11: Refactor setting ramp delay

2014-05-26 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On wto, 2014-05-27 at 11:56 +0530, Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski > wrote: > > Prepare for merging the s2mpa01 regulator driver into s2mps11 by: > > 1. Adding common id for buck regulators. > > 2. Splitting shared ramp delay

Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: s2mps11: Merge S2MPA01 driver

2014-05-26 Thread Yadwinder Singh Brar
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Add S2MPA01 support to the s2mps11 regulator driver. This obsoletes the > s2mpa01 regulator driver. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > @@ -216,30 +250,20 @@ static int s2mps11_set_ramp_delay(struct regulator_dev > *rdev, int ra

Re: [PATCH v2 13/18] ARM: dts: s6e3fa0: add DT bindings

2014-05-26 Thread Andrzej Hajda
Hi Thierry, On 05/26/2014 03:41 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:43:05PM +0900, YoungJun Cho wrote: >> This patch adds DT bindings for s6e3fa0 panel. >> The bindings describes panel resources, display timings and cpu mode timings. >> >> Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho >> Acked-b

[PATCH v2] pinctrl: Enable "power-source" to be extracted from DT files

2014-05-26 Thread Ivan T. Ivanov
From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" Add "power-source" property to generic options used for DT parsing files. This enables drivers, which use generic pin configurations, to get the value passed to this property. Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.t

Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: s2mps11: Refactor setting ramp delay

2014-05-26 Thread Yadwinder Singh Brar
Hi Krzysztof, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Prepare for merging the s2mpa01 regulator driver into s2mps11 by: > 1. Adding common id for buck regulators. > 2. Splitting shared ramp delay settings to match S2MPA01. > 3. Adding a configuration of registers for settin

Re: [PATCH 03/17] phy: ti-pipe3: add external clock support for PCIe PHY

2014-05-26 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On Thursday 15 May 2014 06:03 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 05/15/2014 07:18 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thursday 15 May 2014 05:42 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I >>> wrote: Hi Nishant, On Thursday 1

Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: hisilicon: add hix5hd2 mac driver

2014-05-26 Thread zhangfei
Hi Arnd, Thanks for the kind suggestions. On 05/26/2014 10:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Monday 19 May 2014, Zhangfei Gao wrote: I only noticed one real issue with the driver: +struct hix5hd2_desc { + __le32 buff_addr; + __le32 buff_len:11; + __le32 reserve2:5; + __l

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 05/26/2014 05:32 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 04:42:44PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 05/26/2014 03:36 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:33:03PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: After thinking about it more, I think it is very likely that removing a

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: link PCI USB devices to USB PHY

2014-05-26 Thread Magnus Damm
iginal work by Ben Dooks . > > >>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov > > >>> --- >>> This patch is against 'renesas-devel-v3.15-rc7-20140526' tag of Simon >>> Horman's >>> 'renesas.git' repo plus R8A7790/Lager PCI and

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Sebastian Reichel
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 04:42:44PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 05/26/2014 03:36 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > >On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:33:03PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: > >>After thinking about it more, I think it is very likely that removing > >>all the overlays is the correct thing to d

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 05/26/2014 02:44 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Grant, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote: After thinking about it more, I think it is very likely that removing all the overlays is the correct thing to do in the kexec use-case. When kexec-ing, it makes sense that we'd wa

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 05/26/2014 03:36 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: Hi, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:33:03PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: After thinking about it more, I think it is very likely that removing all the overlays is the correct thing to do in the kexec use-case. When kexec-ing, it makes sense that we'd wa

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 08:14:08AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 05/26/2014 08:09 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > >On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 02:55:37PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >>On May 26, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > >>>On Mon, 26 May 2014 12:57:32 +0200, Geert Uytterhoev

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: link PCI USB devices to USB PHY

2014-05-26 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
5-rc7-20140526' tag of Simon Horman's 'renesas.git' repo plus R8A7790/Lager PCI and USB PHY support patches posted before. The patch requires the internal PCI DT support, USB PHY driver, and USB HCD generic PHY support (also already posted) in order to work. Changes in version

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:33:03PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: > After thinking about it more, I think it is very likely that removing > all the overlays is the correct thing to do in the kexec use-case. When > kexec-ing, it makes sense that we'd want the exact same behaviour from > the kexec'e

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: link PCI USB devices to USB PHY

2014-05-26 Thread Magnus Damm
h is against 'renesas-devel-v3.15-rc7-20140526' tag of Simon Horman's > 'renesas.git' repo plus R8A7790/Lager PCI and USB PHY support patches posted > before. The patch requires the internal PCI DT support, USB PHY driver, and > USB HCD generic PHY support (al

[PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: r8a7791: link PCI USB devices to USB PHY

2014-05-26 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Describe the PCI USB devices that are behind the PCI bridges, adding necessary links to the USB PHY device. Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov --- This patch is against 'renesas-devel-v3.15-rc7-20140526' tag of Simon Horman's 'renesas.git' repo plus R8A7791/Koelsch/Henninge

[PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: link PCI USB devices to USB PHY

2014-05-26 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Describe the PCI USB devices that are behind the PCI bridges, adding necessary links to the USB PHY device. Based on the original work by Ben Dooks . Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov --- This patch is against 'renesas-devel-v3.15-rc7-20140526' tag of Simon Horman's 're

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

2014-05-26 Thread Kukjin Kim
On 05/26/14 20:11, Tomasz Figa wrote: Hi, Hi On 26.05.2014 05:23, Tarek Dakhran wrote: The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Grant, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > After thinking about it more, I think it is very likely that removing > all the overlays is the correct thing to do in the kexec use-case. When > kexec-ing, it makes sense that we'd want the exact same behaviour from > the kexec'ed

[PATCH 1/2] dt-binding: add vendor prefix for SolidRun

2014-05-26 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
SolidRun is a company from Israel producing small-sized home-media computers like the Marvell Dove based CuBox and Freescale IMX based CuBox-i. Document the missing vendor prefix. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth --- Cc: Rob Herring Cc: Pawel Moll Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Ian Campbell Cc: Kum

[PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: mvebu: split SolidRun CuBox into variants

2014-05-26 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
As Mainlining effort for SolidRun CuBox has been carried out on the Engineering Sample, the board DTS was reflecting this. Actually, SolidRun CuBox comes in three different variants: Engineering Sample (ES), production with 1GB RAM (1G), and production with 2GB RAM (2G). Therefore, we split the cu

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, 26 May 2014 14:55:37 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On May 26, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 May 2014 12:57:32 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven > > wrote: > >> Hi Grant, > >> > >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Grant Likely > >> wrote: > >>> On

Re: [PATCH v4] openrisc: irq: use irqchip framework

2014-05-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
CC devicetree for the bindings On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Stefan Kristiansson wrote: > In addition to consolidating the or1k-pic with other interrupt > controllers, this makes OpenRISC less tied to its on-cpu > interrupt controller. > > All or1k-pic specific parts are moved out of irq.c an

[PATCH] of_regulator: use of_property_read_{bool|u32}()

2014-05-26 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Use more compact of_property_read_{bool|u32}() calls instead of the of_{find|get}_property() calls in of_get_regulation_constraints() where possible (note that of_property_read_{bool|u32}() were already used to read some properties). Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov --- The patch is against Mark B

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: rockchip: convert smp bringup to CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE

2014-05-26 Thread Olof Johansson
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Am Montag, 26. Mai 2014, 11:13:15 schrieb Olof Johansson: >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:06:32AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: >> > With the newly introduced CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE is not necessary anymore >> > to reference the relevant smp_ops

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: rockchip: convert smp bringup to CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE

2014-05-26 Thread Heiko Stübner
Am Montag, 26. Mai 2014, 11:13:15 schrieb Olof Johansson: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:06:32AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > With the newly introduced CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE is not necessary anymore > > to reference the relevant smp_ops in the board file, but instead it can > > simply be set by th

[PATCH 2/2] emac: aggregation of v1-2 PLB errors for IER register

2014-05-26 Thread Ivan Mikhaylov
Aggreagation of version 1-2 because of version 1 can hit PLB errors too. If it's not set so we missing events for PLB bits and driver can't process those interrupts. Signed-off-by: Ivan Mikhaylov --- drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c | 5 + drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.h | 20 ++

[PATCH 1/2] emac: add missing support of 10mbit in emac/rgmii

2014-05-26 Thread Ivan Mikhaylov
In chips of emac/rgmii b'000' for 0/1 channel isn't suitable which resulted in non working network interface in this mode. Signed-off-by: Ivan Mikhaylov --- drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/rgmii.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/rgmii.c b/driv

Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: use of_property_read_{bool|u32}()

2014-05-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:01:40PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 05/26/2014 09:56 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >By avoiding CCing lkml you avoided CCing the list where regulator > >patches are discussed. When using get_maintainers.pl you need to think > >about what it's telling you. >The pro

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: rockchip: convert smp bringup to CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE

2014-05-26 Thread Olof Johansson
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:06:32AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > With the newly introduced CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE is not necessary anymore > to reference the relevant smp_ops in the board file, but instead it can > simply be set by the enable-method property of the cpu nodes. > > Signed-off-by: Hei

Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: use of_property_read_{bool|u32}()

2014-05-26 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >> By avoiding CCing lkml you avoided CCing the list where regulator >> patches are discussed. When using get_maintainers.pl you need to think >> about what it's telling you. > > >The problem with LKML is that it's always suggested, eve

Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: use of_property_read_{bool|u32}()

2014-05-26 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
On 05/26/2014 09:56 PM, Mark Brown wrote: Always CC mailing lists on patches. Er, I did CC devicetree@vger.kernel.org but (as usual) avoided CCing LKML -- that's all the lists scripts/get_maintainer.pl suggested. Do you mean some other list I don't know about? By avoiding CCing lkml yo

Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: use of_property_read_{bool|u32}()

2014-05-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:33:34PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 05/26/2014 07:19 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Always CC mailing lists on patches. >Er, I did CC devicetree@vger.kernel.org but (as usual) avoided CCing LKML > -- that's all the lists scripts/get_maintainer.pl suggested. Do you

Re: RFC: representing sdio devices oob interrupt, clks, etc. in device tree

2014-05-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 05/26/2014 06:07 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > [snip] > >>> >>> We don't typically actually bind multiple compatibles for a single >>> device. We've got a bunch of options we can choose from but we >>> generally pick the one that matches best and ignore the others. >>> Where as what you'r

Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: use of_property_read_{bool|u32}()

2014-05-26 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 05/26/2014 07:19 PM, Mark Brown wrote: Use more compact of_property_read_{bool|u32}() calls instead of the of_{find|get}_property() calls. Applied, thanks. Thank you for the quick reply! :-) Always CC mailing lists on patches. Er, I did CC devicetree@vger.kernel.org bu

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: debug: qcom: add UART addresses to Kconfig help

2014-05-26 Thread Matthias Brugger
2014-05-26 15:45 GMT+02:00 Georgi Djakov : > On 23.05.14, 19:39, Matthias Brugger wrote: >> >> 2014-05-23 17:12 GMT+02:00 Georgi Djakov : >>> >>> Add information about the APQ8084 debug UART physical and virtual >>> addresses in the DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM Kconfig help section. >>> Requires: https://lkml

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: add i.MX5 cpufreq driver

2014-05-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 26 May 2014 21:27, Lucas Stach wrote: > No, we need the regulator to determine which OPPs are actually useable. > If the regulator is only supplying 1.1V we can only scale to 800MHz max, > which is the case for some of the industrial i.MX53 versions. Go and add another binding for this max-vol

Re: RFC: representing sdio devices oob interrupt, clks, etc. in device tree

2014-05-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 06:07:18PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > >> I'm not sure I'm buying the idea that we have a powerup driver that's > >> meaningfully not part of the main device driver. > I am having a bit hard to follow the terminology here. :-) What is a > "powerup driver" and what is a "ma

Re: RFC: representing sdio devices oob interrupt, clks, etc. in device tree

2014-05-26 Thread Ulf Hansson
[snip] >> >> We don't typically actually bind multiple compatibles for a single >> device. We've got a bunch of options we can choose from but we >> generally pick the one that matches best and ignore the others. >> >>> Where as what you're suggesting is to always pick driver foo, unless >>> driv

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: add i.MX5 cpufreq driver

2014-05-26 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Montag, den 26.05.2014, 21:05 +0530 schrieb Viresh Kumar: > On 26 May 2014 20:58, Lucas Stach wrote: > > The platform I'm working on supports cpu rail voltage regulation just > > fine. > > So, the regulator can be scaled to support all values from your dts > and we can work without MAX-volt pa

Re: [PATCH 0/2] regulator: pfuze100: Minor driver enhancements

2014-05-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 04:45:39PM +0800, Sean Cross wrote: > The PFUZE100 supports enabling/disabling of SWB regulators, but the driver > doesn't currently support this. The first patch adds support for the > enable/disable bit. Applied, thanks. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: add i.MX5 cpufreq driver

2014-05-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 26 May 2014 20:58, Lucas Stach wrote: > The platform I'm working on supports cpu rail voltage regulation just > fine. So, the regulator can be scaled to support all values from your dts and we can work without MAX-volt parameter here.. > I just want to make sure that the driver works properly

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: add i.MX5 cpufreq driver

2014-05-26 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Montag, den 26.05.2014, 20:52 +0530 schrieb Viresh Kumar: > On 26 May 2014 19:28, Lucas Stach wrote: > > Right, the OPP in my example define the minimum required voltage for > > each frequency. This is in accordance to the OPP binding. But for this > > chip the datasheet explicitly says that it

Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: pfuze100: Support SWB enable/disable

2014-05-26 Thread Sean Cross
On 26/5/2014 10:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 04:45:40PM +0800, Sean Cross wrote: + .enable_reg = (base), \ + .enable_mask = 0x48,\ I note that this is a two bit field - what do the two bits mean? The datasheet defines the r

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: add i.MX5 cpufreq driver

2014-05-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 26 May 2014 19:28, Lucas Stach wrote: > Right, the OPP in my example define the minimum required voltage for > each frequency. This is in accordance to the OPP binding. But for this > chip the datasheet explicitly says that it is ok to power the cpu rail > with up to 1.4V, regardless of the cur

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: max98095: Add master clock handling

2014-05-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 01:58:22PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > If master clock is provided through device tree, then update > the master clock frequency during set_sysclk. Applied, thanks. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: use of_property_read_{bool|u32}()

2014-05-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 11:50:39PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Use more compact of_property_read_{bool|u32}() calls instead of the > of_{find|get}_property() calls. Applied, thanks. Always CC mailing lists on patches. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: max98090: Add master clock handling

2014-05-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 01:58:21PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > If master clock is provided through device tree, then update > the master clock frequency during set_sysclk. Applied, thanks. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Pantelis Antoniou
Hi Sebastian, On May 26, 2014, at 6:09 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 02:55:37PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> On May 26, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >>> On Mon, 26 May 2014 12:57:32 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven >>> wrote: >>> Heeheehee. We're back w

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 05/26/2014 08:09 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: Hi, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 02:55:37PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: On May 26, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Grant Likely wrote: On Mon, 26 May 2014 12:57:32 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Heeheehee. We're back where we started. The original question

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 02:55:37PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > On May 26, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Mon, 26 May 2014 12:57:32 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven > > wrote: > > Heeheehee. We're back where we started. The original question is whether > > or not that is a valid

Re: RFC: representing sdio devices oob interrupt, clks, etc. in device tree

2014-05-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 05/26/2014 04:22 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 01:12:43PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> On 05/26/2014 12:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:20:52PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> until we've powered up and enumerated. The only time that there's a

Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: pfuze100: Support SWB enable/disable

2014-05-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 04:45:40PM +0800, Sean Cross wrote: > + .enable_reg = (base), \ > + .enable_mask = 0x48,\ I note that this is a two bit field - what do the two bits mean? signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] of: Add vendor prefix for Linear Technology Corporation

2014-05-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:38:14AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Add Linear Technology Corporation to the list of device tree vendor prefixes. Applied, thanks. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[PATCH v5 5/7] Documentation: bindings: document the sub-nodes AHCI bindings

2014-05-26 Thread Antoine Ténart
The libahci now allows to use multiple PHYs and to represent each port as a sub-node. Add these bindings to the documentation. Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart --- .../devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.txt | 38 +- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -

[PATCH v5 2/7] Documentation: bindings: add the Berlin SATA PHY

2014-05-26 Thread Antoine Ténart
The Berlin SATA PHY drives the PHY related to the SATA interface. Add the corresponding documentation. Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/berlin-sata-phy.txt | 14 ++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bi

[PATCH v5 1/7] phy: add a driver for the Berlin SATA PHY

2014-05-26 Thread Antoine Ténart
The Berlin SoC has a two SATA ports. Add a PHY driver to handle them. The mode selection can let us think this PHY can be configured to fit other purposes. But there are reasons to think the SATA mode will be the only one usable: the PHY registers are only accessible indirectly through two registe

[PATCH v5 6/7] ARM: berlin: add the AHCI node for the BG2Q

2014-05-26 Thread Antoine Ténart
The BG2Q has an AHCI SATA controller. Add the corresponding nodes (AHCI, PHY) into its device tree. Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart --- arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi | 27 +++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/d

Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: hisilicon: add hix5hd2 mac driver

2014-05-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 19 May 2014, Zhangfei Gao wrote: I only noticed one real issue with the driver: > +struct hix5hd2_desc { > + __le32 buff_addr; > + __le32 buff_len:11; > + __le32 reserve2:5; > + __le32 data_len:11; > + __le32 reserve1:2; > + __le32 fl:2; > + __le32 descvid:1;

[PATCH v5 7/7] ARM: berlin: enable the eSATA interface on the BG2Q DMP

2014-05-26 Thread Antoine Ténart
The BG2Q has an AHCI SATA controller with an eSATA interface. Enable it. Only enable the first port, the BG2Q DMP does not support the second one. Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart --- arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q-marvell-dmp.dts | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boo

[PATCH v5 3/7] ata: libahci: allow to use multiple PHYs

2014-05-26 Thread Antoine Ténart
The current implementation of the libahci does not allow to use multiple PHYs. This patch adds the support of multiple PHYs by the libahci while keeping the old bindings valid for device tree compatibility. This introduce a new way of defining SATA ports in the device tree, with one port per sub-n

[PATCH v5 4/7] ata: ahci_platform: add a generic AHCI compatible

2014-05-26 Thread Antoine Ténart
The ahci_platform driver is a generic driver using the libahci_platform functions. Add a generic compatible to avoid having an endless list of compatibles with no differences for the same driver. Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart --- drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+

[PATCH v5 0/7] ARM: berlin: add AHCI support

2014-05-26 Thread Antoine Ténart
This series adds the support for Berlin SoC AHCI controller. The controller allows to use the SATA host interface and, for example, the eSATA port on the BG2Q. The series adds a PHY driver to control the two SATA ports available, and adds a generic compatible to use the existing ahci_platform driv

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] mmc: host: add slot argument to mmc_of_parse

2014-05-26 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 26 May 2014 13:35, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > From: Ludovic Desroches > > Some hosts manage several slots. In these case information such as the > bus width, chip detect and others are into the slot node. So we have to > parse child node. If not NULL, slot node will be used instead of the > device

Re: RFC: representing sdio devices oob interrupt, clks, etc. in device tree

2014-05-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 01:12:43PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 05/26/2014 12:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:20:52PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > until we've powered up and enumerated. The only time that there's a > > problem and would need to specify exactly what

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: add i.MX5 cpufreq driver

2014-05-26 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Montag, den 26.05.2014, 19:14 +0530 schrieb Viresh Kumar: > On 26 May 2014 18:41, Lucas Stach wrote: > > Just to mention that I am trying to help you and am not opposing any > change. We can add this field if its really required and I am just trying > to understand your problem and if we can s

Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: dts: Fix missing device_type="memory" for ste-ccu8540

2014-05-26 Thread Grant Likely
Oops, sent this series out by mistake. Sorry for the noise. g. On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > From: Leif Lindholm > > The current .dts for ste-ccu8540 lacks a 'device_type = "memory"' for > its memory node, relying on an old ppc quirk in order to discover its > memory. F

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: debug: qcom: add UART addresses to Kconfig help

2014-05-26 Thread Georgi Djakov
On 23.05.14, 19:39, Matthias Brugger wrote: 2014-05-23 17:12 GMT+02:00 Georgi Djakov : Add information about the APQ8084 debug UART physical and virtual addresses in the DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM Kconfig help section. Requires: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/14/312 Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov --- arch

Re: [PATCH v2 13/18] ARM: dts: s6e3fa0: add DT bindings

2014-05-26 Thread Thierry Reding
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:43:05PM +0900, YoungJun Cho wrote: > This patch adds DT bindings for s6e3fa0 panel. > The bindings describes panel resources, display timings and cpu mode timings. > > Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho > Acked-by: Inki Dae > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park > --- > .../devicetree/b

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: add i.MX5 cpufreq driver

2014-05-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 26 May 2014 18:41, Lucas Stach wrote: Just to mention that I am trying to help you and am not opposing any change. We can add this field if its really required and I am just trying to understand your problem and if we can solve it with current code. > No, setting voltage-tolerance to zero mea

[PATCH 2/2] mips: dts: Fix missing device_type="memory" property in memory nodes

2014-05-26 Thread Grant Likely
From: Leif Lindholm A few platforms lack a 'device_type = "memory"' for their memory nodes, relying on an old ppc quirk in order to discover its memory. Add the missing data so that all parsing code can find memory nodes correctly. Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm Cc: linux-m...@linux-mips.org Cc:

[PATCH 1/2] arm: dts: Fix missing device_type="memory" for ste-ccu8540

2014-05-26 Thread Grant Likely
From: Leif Lindholm The current .dts for ste-ccu8540 lacks a 'device_type = "memory"' for its memory node, relying on an old ppc quirk in order to discover its memory. Fix the data so that all parsing code can handle it correctly. Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm Acked-by: Lee Jones Acked-by: Linu

Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] ASoC: simple-card: Support setting mclk via a fixed factor

2014-05-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 05:31:49PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > Some platforms require that the codecs mclk is a fixed multiplication > factor of the audio stream rate. Add a optional property to the > binding to hold this factor and implement a hw_params() function to > make use of it. Applied, th

[PATCH 1/3] regulator: s2mps11: Refactor setting ramp delay

2014-05-26 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
Prepare for merging the s2mpa01 regulator driver into s2mps11 by: 1. Adding common id for buck regulators. 2. Splitting shared ramp delay settings to match S2MPA01. 3. Adding a configuration of registers for setting ramp delay for each buck regulator. The functionality of the driver should not

[PATCH 2/3] regulator: s2mps11: Merge S2MPA01 driver

2014-05-26 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
Add S2MPA01 support to the s2mps11 regulator driver. This obsoletes the s2mpa01 regulator driver. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/s2mps11.txt | 106 drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 4 +- drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c

[PATCH 0/3] regulator: merge s2mps11 and s2mpa01 drivers

2014-05-26 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
Hi, The patchset merges s2mpa01 regulator driver into s2mps11. As a result the s2mps11 supports: - S2MPA01 - S2MPS11 - S2MPS14 These PMIC-s are very similar to each other and they are often used along with Samsung's Exynos SoCs. Merging this into one driver has two benefits: - less code dupl

[PATCH 3/3] regulator: s2mpa01: Remove driver because it was merged into s2mps11

2014-05-26 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
The s2mpa01 regulator driver can be safely removed since it was merged into s2mps11 driver. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/s2mpa01.txt | 90 drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 7 - drivers/regulator/Makefile

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: add i.MX5 cpufreq driver

2014-05-26 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Montag, den 26.05.2014, 18:26 +0530 schrieb Viresh Kumar: > On 26 May 2014 18:05, Lucas Stach wrote: [...] > > > 2. Usage of a fixed max voltage, rather than a voltage-tolerance. i.MX5 > > has a fixed maximum voltage, which is valid across all operating points. > > I'm really opposed to using

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] clk: tegra: Implement Tegra124 shared/cbus clks

2014-05-26 Thread Thierry Reding
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:35:18PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Thierry Reding (2014-05-14 07:27:40) [...] > > As for shared clocks I'm only aware of one use-case, namely EMC scaling. > > Using clocks for that doesn't seem like the best option to me. While it > > can probably fix the imme

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: add i.MX5 cpufreq driver

2014-05-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 26 May 2014 18:05, Lucas Stach wrote: > Ok I can push down the clock handling into the imx5 clk driver. Great !! > This leaves two more differences between imx5-cpufreq and cpufreq-cpu0: > > 1. Disabling of OPPs that could not be supported by the connected > regulator. I think this part can e

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: add i.MX5 cpufreq driver

2014-05-26 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Montag, den 26.05.2014, 16:36 +0530 schrieb Viresh Kumar: > On 26 May 2014 16:15, Lucas Stach wrote: > > This driver handles the i.MX5 specific clock reparenting to be able to > > reprogramm the PLL. cpufreq-cpu0 can only change a postdivider of the > > PLL, which means we can't reach the exact

[PATCH v2 2/3] clk: exynos5420: Add IDs for clocks used in PD mfc

2014-05-26 Thread Shaik Ameer Basha
From: Arun Kumar K Adds IDs for MUX clocks to be used by power domain for MFC for doing re-parenting while pd on/off. Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K Signed-off-by: Shaik Ameer Basha --- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |6 -- include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h |2 ++ 2 file

[PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: Add clock property for mfc_pd in 5420

2014-05-26 Thread Shaik Ameer Basha
From: Arun Kumar K Adding the optional clock property for the mfc_pd for handling the re-parenting while pd on/off. Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K Signed-off-by: Shaik Ameer Basha Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi |3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --

[PATCH v2 0/3] Power-domain clk handling

2014-05-26 Thread Shaik Ameer Basha
This patchset enables the clk handling in power domain for working as per the recommended power domain on / off sequence for exynos5 SoCs. I have posted an RFC for the same [1] and didnt get any review comments / objections. So I am dropping the RFC tag and posting the patch along with the required

[PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for clock handling in power domain

2014-05-26 Thread Shaik Ameer Basha
From: Prathyush K While powering on/off a local powerdomain in exynos5 chipsets, the input clocks to each device gets modified. This behaviour is based on the SYSCLK_SYS_PWR_REG registers. E.g. SYSCLK_MFC_SYS_PWR_REG = 0x0, the parent of input clock to MFC (aclk

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Pantelis Antoniou
Hi Grant, On May 26, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, 26 May 2014 12:57:32 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: >> Hi Grant, >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Grant Likely >> wrote: >>> On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:38:49 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven >>> wrote: On Tue, May 20,

[PATCHv2 1/3] mmc: host: add slot argument to mmc_of_parse

2014-05-26 Thread Jaehoon Chung
From: Ludovic Desroches Some hosts manage several slots. In these case information such as the bus width, chip detect and others are into the slot node. So we have to parse child node. If not NULL, slot node will be used instead of the device node. Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches Signed-off-by

[PATCHv2 2/3] mmc: dw_mmc: use the __mmc_of_parse to parse the slot node

2014-05-26 Thread Jaehoon Chung
dw-mmc controller have the multiple slot. Then it needs to parse the property for each slot. Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung --- Changelog V2: - None drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 25 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/

[PATCHv2 3/3] ARM: dts: replace the broken-cd property into slot node for dwmmc.

2014-05-26 Thread Jaehoon Chung
dw-mmc controller can be support the multiple slot. So each slot's property can be difference. Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung --- Changelog V2: - None arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroidx.dts |2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-origen.dts |2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos

[PATCHv2 0/3] mmc: fixed the mmc_of_parse for dwmmc

2014-05-26 Thread Jaehoon Chung
This patch-set is fixed the dw-mmc controller problem. dw-mmc controller have the slot, but mmc_of_parse didn't parse the slot sub-node. So dw-mmc controller didn't work correctly. Jaehoon Chung (2): mmc: dw_mmc: use the __mmc_of_parse to parse the slot node ARM: dts: replace the broken-cd pr

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, 26 May 2014 12:57:32 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Grant Likely > wrote: > > On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:38:49 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven > > wrote: > >> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Grant Likely > >> wrote: > >> >> Why has the over

Re: RFC: representing sdio devices oob interrupt, clks, etc. in device tree

2014-05-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 05/26/2014 12:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:20:52PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Also the mmc people are very much against specifying a driver, as that is >> something which should be probed not specified. I agree with them I've >> already seen boards were more

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

2014-05-26 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi, On 26.05.2014 05:23, Tarek Dakhran wrote: > The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC > > The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture > > Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device > tree for Exynos 5410. > > H

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Pantelis Antoniou
Hi Geert, On May 26, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Grant Likely > wrote: >> On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:38:49 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven >> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Grant Likely >>> wrote: > Why has the overlay

Re: [PATCH v2 04/18] video: add command mode and command mode display timing

2014-05-26 Thread Heiko Stübner
Am Montag, 26. Mai 2014, 12:14:43 schrieb Thierry Reding: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:42:56PM +0900, YoungJun Cho wrote: > > This patch is based on videomode and display_timing relevant codes. > > To support command mode panel, it does not need to guide its timing > > information to the display co

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: add i.MX5 cpufreq driver

2014-05-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 26 May 2014 16:15, Lucas Stach wrote: > This driver handles the i.MX5 specific clock reparenting to be able to > reprogramm the PLL. cpufreq-cpu0 can only change a postdivider of the > PLL, which means we can't reach the exact OPP frequencies and can not > profit from the additional power savin

Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] Documentation: devicetree: add cpu clock configuration data binding for Exynos4/5

2014-05-26 Thread Tomasz Figa
Thomas, On 26.05.2014 08:05, Thomas Abraham wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > Thanks for your comments. Please see inline reply. > > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> Please see my comments inline. >> >> On 14.05.2014 03:11, Thomas Abraham wrote: >>> From; Thomas Abr

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Grant, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:38:49 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: >> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Grant Likely >> wrote: >> >> Why has the overlay system been designed for plugging and unpluging whole >> >> overlays? >> >> Th

Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support.

2014-05-26 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:38:49 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Grant Likely > wrote: > >> Why has the overlay system been designed for plugging and unpluging whole > >> overlays? > >> That means the kernel has to remember the full stack, causing

  1   2   >