;> On 08/29/2015 10:56 PM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Thunder,
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Leizhen (ThunderTown)
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
Hi all,
Can somebody take a few moments to review it? This patch is
too small, only changed two lines.
Thanks,
Thunder.
On 2015/8/25 12:08, Zhen Lei wrote:
> For now, in function device_add, the new device will be forced to
> inherit the numa node of its parent. But this will override the device
Sorry, missed version number in title.
On 2015/8/25 12:08, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Changelog:
> v1 -> v2:
> In patch v1, binding numa node to specified device only take effect for
> dt-nodes
> directly of root. Patch v2 removed this limitation, we can binding numa node
> to
> any specified device in
On 2015/8/29 22:56, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi Thunder,
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Leizhen (ThunderTown)
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2015/8/28 22:02, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> +benh
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Mark Rutl
On 2015/8/29 18:37, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 17:46 +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>> Why not copy the method of ACPI numa? There only three elements
>> should be configured:
>> 1) a cpu belong to which node
>> 2) a memory block bel
On 2015/8/28 22:02, Rob Herring wrote:
> +benh
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 05:39:32PM +0100, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>> DT bindings for numa map for memory, cores and IOs using
>>> arm,associativity device node property.
>>
>
On 2015/8/24 21:25, Rob Herring wrote:
> +benh
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> If use of_platform_populate to scan dt-nodes and add devices, the
>> subnode of root(such as /smmu), when being scanned and invoke
>
> You should have a bus as the sub-node of root rather tha
