2015-04-02 8:50 GMT+08:00 Olof Johansson :
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:44:30PM +0900, Vincent Yang wrote:
>> Hi Arnd and Olof,
>>
>> Please consider pulling in these patches for series of Fujitsu SoC
>> based around variations of 2xCA7+2xCA15 big.LITTLE architecture.
>>
>> The MHU
On 31/03/15 04:02, Jassi Brar wrote:
On 18 March 2015 at 11:14, Vincent Yang wrote:
Hi Arnd and Olof,
Please consider pulling in these patches for series of Fujitsu SoC
based around variations of 2xCA7+2xCA15 big.LITTLE architecture.
The MHU driver is already queued in Mailbox tree.
I see
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 08:32:01AM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On 18 March 2015 at 11:14, Vincent Yang wrote:
> > Hi Arnd and Olof,
> >
> > Please consider pulling in these patches for series of Fujitsu SoC
> > based around variations of 2xCA7+2xCA15 big.LITTLE architecture.
> >
> > The MHU driver
Hi Vincent,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:44:30PM +0900, Vincent Yang wrote:
> Hi Arnd and Olof,
>
> Please consider pulling in these patches for series of Fujitsu SoC
> based around variations of 2xCA7+2xCA15 big.LITTLE architecture.
>
> The MHU driver is already queued in Mailbox tree.
>
> Thank
On 18 March 2015 at 11:14, Vincent Yang wrote:
> Hi Arnd and Olof,
>
> Please consider pulling in these patches for series of Fujitsu SoC
> based around variations of 2xCA7+2xCA15 big.LITTLE architecture.
>
> The MHU driver is already queued in Mailbox tree.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The following changes s
Hi Arnd and Olof,
Please consider pulling in these patches for series of Fujitsu SoC
based around variations of 2xCA7+2xCA15 big.LITTLE architecture.
The MHU driver is already queued in Mailbox tree.
Thanks,
The following changes since commit c517d838eb7d07bbe9507871fab3931deccff539:
Linux 4