From: Olof Johansson
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 17:10:39 -0700
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Rickard Strandqvist
> wrote:
>> There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized.
>>
>> This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called
>> cppcheck.
>>
>> S
Hi
No, regardless if it is a program that cppcheck or myself with limited
experience of kernel programming is not so easy to figure out.
But then I know that there is nothing wrong in this case, and that is
the main thing :-)
Best regards
Rickard Strandqvist
2014-06-02 2:10 GMT+02:00 Olof Joha
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Rickard Strandqvist
wrote:
> There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized.
>
> This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called
> cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
> ---
> drivers/atm/fore200e.c |
There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized.
This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
---
drivers/atm/fore200e.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/
