Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of: document bindings for reserved-memory nodes

2014-02-05 Thread Josh Cartwright
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:07:50AM +, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:09:33 +0100, Marek Szyprowski > wrote: > > From: Grant Likely > > +/reserved-memory node > > +- > > +#address-cells, #size-cells (required) - standard definition > > +- Should use the s

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] of: document bindings for reserved-memory nodes

2014-02-05 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:09:33 +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > From: Grant Likely > > Reserved memory nodes allow for the reservation of static (fixed > address) regions, or dynamically allocated regions for a specific > purpose. > > [joshc: Based on binding document proposed (in non-patch form

[PATCH v2 5/5] of: document bindings for reserved-memory nodes

2014-02-04 Thread Marek Szyprowski
From: Grant Likely Reserved memory nodes allow for the reservation of static (fixed address) regions, or dynamically allocated regions for a specific purpose. [joshc: Based on binding document proposed (in non-patch form) here: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20131030134702.19b57c40...@trevor.secretla