Re: ARM: gic_arch_extn (Was: [PATCH v3] irqchip: mmp: add dt support for wakeup)

2013-12-06 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:25:49PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > The frequency of invoking the gic_arch_extn callbacks is exactly equal > to the frequency of interrupts in the system which go through the GIC > at least for mask/unmask/eoi. The frequency of calls per interrupt > depends on the int

Re: ARM: gic_arch_extn (Was: [PATCH v3] irqchip: mmp: add dt support for wakeup)

2013-12-06 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > So there's not much point discussing this with you until you: > > (a) calm down Done so :) > (b) analyse it properly and work out the frequency under which each > class of IRQ (those >= 32 and those < 32) call into these functions. Here you

Re: ARM: gic_arch_extn (Was: [PATCH v3] irqchip: mmp: add dt support for wakeup)

2013-12-05 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 03:12:55AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Russell, > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 01:41:53AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > @all who feel responsible for gic_arch_extn > > > > > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Thomas Gleixne

Re: ARM: gic_arch_extn (Was: [PATCH v3] irqchip: mmp: add dt support for wakeup)

2013-12-04 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Russell, On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 01:41:53AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > @all who feel responsible for gic_arch_extn > > > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > I'm going to reply in a separate mail on this, because you have

Re: ARM: gic_arch_extn (Was: [PATCH v3] irqchip: mmp: add dt support for wakeup)

2013-12-04 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 01:41:53AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > @all who feel responsible for gic_arch_extn > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I'm going to reply in a separate mail on this, because you have > > brought this to my attention, but you are not responsible in the fir

ARM: gic_arch_extn (Was: [PATCH v3] irqchip: mmp: add dt support for wakeup)

2013-12-04 Thread Thomas Gleixner
@all who feel responsible for gic_arch_extn On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > I'm going to reply in a separate mail on this, because you have > brought this to my attention, but you are not responsible in the first > place for this brainfart. Who came up with that gic_arch_extn concept

Re: [PATCH v3] irqchip: mmp: add dt support for wakeup

2013-12-04 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Neil Zhang wrote: > Some of the Marvell SoCs use GIC as its interrupt controller,and ICU > only used as wakeup logic. When AP subsystem is powered off, GIC will > lose its context, the PMU will need ICU to wakeup the AP subsystem. > So add wakeup entry for such kind of usage.

[PATCH v3] irqchip: mmp: add dt support for wakeup

2013-12-04 Thread Neil Zhang
Some of the Marvell SoCs use GIC as its interrupt controller,and ICU only used as wakeup logic. When AP subsystem is powered off, GIC will lose its context, the PMU will need ICU to wakeup the AP subsystem. So add wakeup entry for such kind of usage. Signed-off-by: Neil Zhang --- .../devicetree/