On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:16:20 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> On 21/03/14 13:47, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> > I'm firm on the opinion that the checking must also happen at runtime.
> > The biggest part of my objection has been how easy it would be to get a
> > linkage out of sync, and dtc is not nece
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Friday 21 March 2014 08:15:34 Grant Likely wrote:
>> Why don't we instead try a Google Hangout or a phone call today.
>> Anywhere between 11:30 and 14:00 GMT would work for me. I'd offer to
>> provide the tea, but I haven
Hi Grant,
On Friday 21 March 2014 08:15:34 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:26:12 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 March 2014 23:12:50 Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > Then we might not be talking about the s
On 21/03/14 13:47, Grant Likely wrote:
> I'm firm on the opinion that the checking must also happen at runtime.
> The biggest part of my objection has been how easy it would be to get a
> linkage out of sync, and dtc is not necessarily the last tool to touch
> the dtb before the kernel gets booted
On 20/03/14 19:01, Grant Likely wrote:
> I think depending on a generic graph walk is where I have the biggest
> concern about the design. I don't think it is a good idea for the master
> device to try a generic walk over the graph looking for other devices
> that might be components because it ca
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:44:24 +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 03/20/2014 06:23 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:16:37 +0100, Laurent Pinchart
> > wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 11 March 2014 14:59:20 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >>> So depending on the use case, the endpoints would point to
On 03/20/2014 06:23 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:16:37 +0100, Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 11 March 2014 14:59:20 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> So depending on the use case, the endpoints would point to opposite
>>> direction from the encoder's point of view.
>>>
>>> An
On 20/03/14 20:49, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> The CPU is the _controlling_ component - it's the component that has to
>> configure the peripherals so they all talk to each other in the right
>> way. Therefore, the view of it needs to be CPU centric.
>>
>> If we were providing a DT description for
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:26:12 +0100, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2014 23:12:50 Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > Then we might not be talking about the same thing. I'm talking about DT
> > > bindings to represent the topolo
Hi Grant,
On Thursday 20 March 2014 23:12:50 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 March 2014 18:48:16 Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:38:04 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > > Em Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:54:31 +000
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2014 18:48:16 Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:38:04 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Em Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:54:31 + Grant Likely escreveu:
> > > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:25:56 +, Rus
Hi Russell,
On Thursday 20 March 2014 18:18:20 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 07:16:29PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 March 2014 17:54:31 Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:25:56 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Ma
On Thursday 20 March 2014 18:48:16 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:38:04 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:54:31 + Grant Likely escreveu:
> > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:25:56 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:52:53P
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:38:04 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Em Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:54:31 +
> Grant Likely escreveu:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:25:56 +, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:52:53PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > In theor
Hi Russell,
On Thursday 20 March 2014 18:18:20 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 07:16:29PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 March 2014 17:54:31 Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:25:56 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
[snip]
> > > > I
On Thursday 20 March 2014 18:43:16 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:38:04PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:54:31 + Grant Likely escreveu:
> > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:25:56 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 10,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:38:04PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:54:31 +
> Grant Likely escreveu:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:25:56 +, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:52:53PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > In t
Em Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:54:31 +
Grant Likely escreveu:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:25:56 +, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:52:53PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > In theory unidirectional links in DT are indeed enough. However, let's
> > > not
> > >
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 07:16:29PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2014 17:54:31 Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:25:56 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:52:53PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > In theory unidirectional
On Thursday 20 March 2014 17:54:31 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:25:56 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:52:53PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > In theory unidirectional links in DT are indeed enough. However, let's
> > > not forget the follow
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:25:56 +, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:52:53PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > In theory unidirectional links in DT are indeed enough. However, let's not
> > forget the following.
> >
> > - There's no such thing as single start points
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:21:49 +0100, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On Tuesday 11 March 2014 16:07:00 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 10.03.2014, 14:58 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > > In theory
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:07:00 +0100, Philipp Zabel
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Am Montag, den 10.03.2014, 14:58 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart
> > wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 March 2014 12:18:20 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > > On 08/03/14 13:41, Gran
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:04:34 +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 03/10/2014 04:15 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Grant,
> >
> > On Monday 10 March 2014 14:58:15 Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Monday 10 March 2014 12:18:20 Tomi Valkei
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:16:37 +0100, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 March 2014 14:59:20 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > So depending on the use case, the endpoints would point to opposite
> > direction from the encoder's point of view.
> >
> > And if I gathered Grant's opinion correctly (corre
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:43:44 +0100, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On Monday 10 March 2014 16:40:30 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 10.03.2014, 16:15 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > > On Monday 10 March 2014 14:58:15 Grant Likely wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:15:37 +0100, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Monday 10 March 2014 14:58:15 Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 March 2014 12:18:20 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > > On 08/03/14 13:41, Grant Likely wr
Hi Russell and Tomi,
On Wednesday 12 March 2014 12:47:09 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 12/03/14 12:25, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:52:53PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> In theory unidirectional links in DT are indeed enough. However, let's
> >> not forget the
On 12/03/14 12:25, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:52:53PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> In theory unidirectional links in DT are indeed enough. However, let's not
>> forget the following.
>>
>> - There's no such thing as single start points for graphs. Sure, in so
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:52:53PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> In theory unidirectional links in DT are indeed enough. However, let's not
> forget the following.
>
> - There's no such thing as single start points for graphs. Sure, in some
> simple cases the graph will have a single start po
Hi Laurent,
Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 16:21 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On Tuesday 11 March 2014 16:07:00 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 10.03.2014, 14:58 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
Hi Philipp,
On Tuesday 11 March 2014 16:07:00 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Montag, den 10.03.2014, 14:58 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
[snip]
> > > In theory unidirectional links in DT are indeed enough. However, let's
> > > not forget t
Hi Grant,
Am Montag, den 10.03.2014, 14:58 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
> > On Monday 10 March 2014 12:18:20 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > On 08/03/14 13:41, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > >> Ok. If we go for single directional link, the qu
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 15:27 +0200 schrieb Tomi Valkeinen:
> On 11/03/14 15:16, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> >> And if I gathered Grant's opinion correctly (correct me if I'm wrong),
> >> he thinks things should be explicit, i.e. the bindings for, say, an
> >> encoder should state that t
On 11/03/14 15:16, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> And if I gathered Grant's opinion correctly (correct me if I'm wrong),
>> he thinks things should be explicit, i.e. the bindings for, say, an
>> encoder should state that the encoder's output endpoint _must_ contain a
>> remote-endpoint property, where
Hi Tomi,
On Tuesday 11 March 2014 14:59:20 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 11/03/14 13:43, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> We could scan the whole tree for entities, ports and endpoints once, in
> >> the base oftree code, and put that into a graph structure, adding the
> >> backlinks. The of_graph_* helpe
On 03/10/2014 04:15 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Monday 10 March 2014 14:58:15 Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Monday 10 March 2014 12:18:20 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 08/03/14 13:41, Grant Likely wrote:
>> Ok. If w
On 11/03/14 13:43, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> We could scan the whole tree for entities, ports and endpoints once, in
>> the base oftree code, and put that into a graph structure, adding the
>> backlinks.
>> The of_graph_* helpers could then use that graph instead of the device
>> tree.
>
> That
Hi Philipp,
On Monday 10 March 2014 16:40:30 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Montag, den 10.03.2014, 16:15 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > On Monday 10 March 2014 14:58:15 Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Monday 10 March 2014 12:18:20 T
Am Montag, den 10.03.2014, 16:15 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Monday 10 March 2014 14:58:15 Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 March 2014 12:18:20 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > > On 08/03/14 13:41, Grant Likely
Hi Grant,
On Monday 10 March 2014 14:58:15 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 10 March 2014 12:18:20 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > On 08/03/14 13:41, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > >> Ok. If we go for single directional link, the question is th
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:53 +0100, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2014 12:18:20 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 08/03/14 13:41, Grant Likely wrote:
> > >> Ok. If we go for single directional link, the question is then: which
> > >> way? And is the direction different for display and c
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:18:20 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> On 08/03/14 13:41, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> >> Ok. If we go for single directional link, the question is then: which
> >> way? And is the direction different for display and camera, which are
> >> kind of reflections of each other?
> >
On 10/03/14 15:52, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> In theory unidirectional links in DT are indeed enough. However, let's not
> forget the following.
>
> - There's no such thing as single start points for graphs. Sure, in some
> simple cases the graph will have a single start point, but that's not a
On Monday 10 March 2014 12:18:20 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 08/03/14 13:41, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> Ok. If we go for single directional link, the question is then: which
> >> way? And is the direction different for display and camera, which are
> >> kind of reflections of each other?
> >
> > In g
On 08/03/14 13:41, Grant Likely wrote:
>> Ok. If we go for single directional link, the question is then: which
>> way? And is the direction different for display and camera, which are
>> kind of reflections of each other?
>
> In general I would recommend choosing whichever device you would
> sen
On 03/08/2014 12:41 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Another thought. In terms of the pattern, I would add a recommendation
> > that there should be a way to identify ports of a particular type. ie.
> > If I were using the pattern to implement an patch bay of DSP filters,
> > where each input and ou
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 01:05:50AM +0800, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:48:49 +0100, Philipp Zabel
> wrote:
> > Or two separate display controllers with two parallel outputs each, a
> > 4-port multiplexer, and an encoder (e.g. lvds):
> >
> > ,--.
> > | disp
On Sat, 8 Mar 2014 12:33:12 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 07/03/14 19:05, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:48:49 +0100, Philipp Zabel
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Grant,
> >>
> >> thank you for the comments.
> >
> > Hi Philipp,
> >
> > I've got lots of comments and quesitons below, but
On 07/03/14 19:06, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:36:36 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen
> wrote:
>> On 26/02/14 16:48, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>>
I would like the document to acknowledge the difference from the
phandle+args pattern used elsewhere and a description of when it would
On 07/03/14 19:05, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:48:49 +0100, Philipp Zabel
> wrote:
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> thank you for the comments.
>
> Hi Philipp,
>
> I've got lots of comments and quesitons below, but I must say thank you
> for doing this. It is a helpful description.
Thanks f
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:36:36 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen
wrote:
> On 26/02/14 16:48, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>
> >> I would like the document to acknowledge the difference from the
> >> phandle+args pattern used elsewhere and a description of when it would
> >> be appropriate to use this instead of a sim
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:48:49 +0100, Philipp Zabel
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> thank you for the comments.
Hi Philipp,
I've got lots of comments and quesitons below, but I must say thank you
for doing this. It is a helpful description.
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 26.02.2014, 11:01 + schrieb Grant Lik
On 26/02/14 16:48, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>> I would like the document to acknowledge the difference from the
>> phandle+args pattern used elsewhere and a description of when it would
>> be appropriate to use this instead of a simpler binding.
>
> Alright. The main point of this binding is that the
Hi Grant,
thank you for the comments.
Am Mittwoch, den 26.02.2014, 11:01 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:36:29 +0100, Philipp Zabel
> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 18.02.2014, 16:26 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> > > >
> > > > You can find it under
> > > > Documentation/devi
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:36:29 +0100, Philipp Zabel
wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 18.02.2014, 16:26 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> > >
> > > You can find it under
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
> >
> > Okay, I think I'm okay with moving the helpers, but I will make
Am Dienstag, den 18.02.2014, 16:26 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:06:24 +0100, Sascha Hauer
> wrote:
> > Hi Grant,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 06:14:51PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:56:33 -0600, Rob Herring
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:06:24 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 06:14:51PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:56:33 -0600, Rob Herring
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Philipp Zabel
> > > wrote:
> > > > From: Philipp Zabel
>
Hi Grant,
Am Montag, den 17.02.2014, 18:14 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:56:33 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Philipp Zabel
> > wrote:
> > > From: Philipp Zabel
> > >
> > > This patch moves the parsing helpers used to parse connected graph
On 17/02/14 19:14, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:56:33 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Philipp Zabel
>> > wrote:
>>> > > From: Philipp Zabel
>>> > >
>>> > > This patch moves the parsing helpers used to parse connected graphs
>>> > > in the device t
Hi Grant,
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 06:14:51PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:56:33 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Philipp Zabel
> > wrote:
> > > From: Philipp Zabel
> > >
> > > This patch moves the parsing helpers used to parse connected grap
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:56:33 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > From: Philipp Zabel
> >
> > This patch moves the parsing helpers used to parse connected graphs
> > in the device tree, like the video interface bindings documented in
> > Documenta
Hi Sylwester,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:22:34PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> drivers/media sounds like a good alternative to me.
>
> I would just remove also v4l2_of_{parse/get}* and update the users
> to call of_graph_* directly, there should not be many of them.
For now I'd like to skip
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:22:34 +0100
> Sylwester Nawrocki escreveu:
>
> > (adding Guennadi to Cc)
> >
> > On 11/02/14 17:36, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 11.02.2014, 16:23 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > >> Hi Russell,
> > >>
Em Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:22:34 +0100
Sylwester Nawrocki escreveu:
> (adding Guennadi to Cc)
>
> On 11/02/14 17:36, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 11.02.2014, 16:23 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> >> Hi Russell,
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 11 February 2014 14:52:48 Russell King - ARM Linux wr
Hi Philipp,
On Tuesday 11 February 2014 17:36:57 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 11.02.2014, 16:23 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2014 14:52:48 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:56:33AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb
(adding Guennadi to Cc)
On 11/02/14 17:36, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 11.02.2014, 16:23 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> On Tuesday 11 February 2014 14:52:48 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:56:33AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tu
Am Dienstag, den 11.02.2014, 16:23 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Tuesday 11 February 2014 14:52:48 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:56:33AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > > This allows
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:56:33AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Philipp Zabel
>> wrote:
>> > This allows to reuse the same parser code from outside the V4L2 framework,
>> > most importantly from d
Hi Rob,
Am Dienstag, den 11.02.2014, 07:56 -0600 schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > From: Philipp Zabel
> >
> > This patch moves the parsing helpers used to parse connected graphs
> > in the device tree, like the video interface bindings documented i
Hi Russell,
On Tuesday 11 February 2014 14:52:48 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:56:33AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > This allows to reuse the same parser code from outside the V4L2
> > > framework, most impo
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:56:33AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > This allows to reuse the same parser code from outside the V4L2 framework,
> > most importantly from display drivers. There have been patches that
> > duplicate
> > the code (a
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> From: Philipp Zabel
>
> This patch moves the parsing helpers used to parse connected graphs
> in the device tree, like the video interface bindings documented in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt, from
> drivers/
From: Philipp Zabel
This patch moves the parsing helpers used to parse connected graphs
in the device tree, like the video interface bindings documented in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt, from
drivers/media/v4l2-core to drivers/of.
This allows to reuse the same pars
74 matches
Mail list logo
