Re: [RFCv2] drm/msm: DT support for 8960/8064

2014-07-17 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:10 AM, divya ojha wrote: [...] >> Don't we need to have a if(regulator_enabled) check after >> devm_regulator_get function ? >> I see a similar test after camera regulator_get function call. > > tbh, I'm not 100% sure.

Re: [RFCv2] drm/msm: DT support for 8960/8064

2014-07-17 Thread Rob Clark
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:10 AM, divya ojha wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Rob Clark wrote: >> Now that we (almost) have enough dependencies in place (MMCC, RPM, etc), >> add necessary DT support so that we can use drm/msm on upstream kernel. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark

Re: [RFCv2] drm/msm: DT support for 8960/8064

2014-07-17 Thread divya ojha
Hi Rob, On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > Now that we (almost) have enough dependencies in place (MMCC, RPM, etc), > add necessary DT support so that we can use drm/msm on upstream kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark > --- > I thought I sent this already, but looks like I've fo

[RFCv2] drm/msm: DT support for 8960/8064

2014-07-08 Thread Rob Clark
Now that we (almost) have enough dependencies in place (MMCC, RPM, etc), add necessary DT support so that we can use drm/msm on upstream kernel. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark --- I thought I sent this already, but looks like I've forgot. I've updated the names for the GPIO properties (and, via helper