Hi Maxime,
Maxime Ripard schrieb am 03.08.2015 11:34:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:03:52AM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
>> Julian Calaby schrieb am 03.08.2015 06:22:
>> > My only real objection here is are there boards that can go down to
>> > 0.9v and if so, won't this change make them less pow
Hi Maxime,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:03:52AM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> Julian Calaby schrieb am 03.08.2015 06:22:
>> > My only real objection here is are there boards that can go down to
>> > 0.9v and if so, won't this
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:03:52AM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Julian Calaby schrieb am 03.08.2015 06:22:
> > My only real objection here is are there boards that can go down to
> > 0.9v and if so, won't this change make them less power efficient in
> > the almost-idle case? And
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 02:22:13PM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
> >> Is the code that uses this smart enough to sensibly switch between two
> >> operating points with the same frequency and different voltages? If
> >> so, maybe just add a 144MHz @ 1.0v operating point?
> >
> > You could try. Though
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:37:51AM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Julian Calaby schrieb am 03.08.2015 01:35:
> >> sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20
> >> boards
> >> (or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to go below 1.0V. Thus, raise
>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:35:51AM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Timo Sigurdsson
> wrote:
> > sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20
> > boards
> > (or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to go below 1.0V. Thus,
Hi again,
Julian Calaby schrieb am 03.08.2015 06:22:
> My only real objection here is are there boards that can go down to
> 0.9v and if so, won't this change make them less power efficient in
> the almost-idle case? And are those power savings enough to justify
> not accepting this patch?
It wil
Hi Julian,
Julian Calaby schrieb am 03.08.2015 01:35:
>> sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20
>> boards
>> (or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to go below 1.0V. Thus, raise
>> the
>> voltage for the lowest operating point to 1.0V so all boards can act
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Chen-Yu,
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Julian Calaby
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Timo,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Timo Sigurdsson
>>> wrote:
sun7i-a20.dtsi
Hi Chen-Yu,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Julian Calaby wrote:
>> Hi Timo,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Timo Sigurdsson
>> wrote:
>>> sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20
>>> boards
>
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Timo Sigurdsson
> wrote:
>> sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20
>> boards
>> (or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to go below 1.0V. Thus, raise
Hi Timo,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Timo Sigurdsson
wrote:
> sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20
> boards
> (or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to go below 1.0V. Thus, raise the
> voltage for the lowest operating point to 1.0V so all boards can
12 matches
Mail list logo
