On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 06/26/2014 03:50 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Gupta, Pekon [140618 01:52]:
>>> Hi,
>>>
From: Jason Kridner [mailto:jkrid...@gmail.com]
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
>> From: Jason Kridner
>>> [...]
>
On 06/26/2014 03:50 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Gupta, Pekon [140618 01:52]:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> From: Jason Kridner [mailto:jkrid...@gmail.com]
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> From: Jason Kridner
>> [...]
>> * The devicetree sources, including the primary boot .dts
* Gupta, Pekon [140618 01:52]:
> Hi,
>
> >From: Jason Kridner [mailto:jkrid...@gmail.com]
> >>On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> >>>From: Jason Kridner
> [...]
> * The devicetree sources, including the primary boot .dts files, will
> eventually be removed from the k
Hi,
>From: Jason Kridner [mailto:jkrid...@gmail.com]
>>On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
>>>From: Jason Kridner
[...]
* The devicetree sources, including the primary boot .dts files, will
eventually be removed from the kernel source tree. I'm not too sure if
and
Hi Rusell,
On Jun 17, 2014, at 8:41 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:10:46PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 8:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> DRM is not hotpluggable in any shape or form, and David Airlie has
>>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:10:46PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Jun 17, 2014, at 8:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > DRM is not hotpluggable in any shape or form, and David Airlie has
> > indicated that he does strongly opposes moving it in that direction.
> >
> >
Hi Russell,
On Jun 17, 2014, at 8:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 07:59:21PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> That case might already work on FPGA people's trees. I know Altera for sure
>> uses overlays, and some xilinx guys popped up on past discussions.
>> The
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 07:59:21PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> That case might already work on FPGA people's trees. I know Altera for sure
> uses overlays, and some xilinx guys popped up on past discussions.
> Their vendor trees probably use an older revision of the patches.
>
> BTW, there i
Hi Russell,
On Jun 17, 2014, at 7:01 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:32:11PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> The complexity is absolutely required, and it has nothing to do with
>> beaglebone capes.
>>
>> The fact of the matter is that reconfigurable hardware
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
>>From: Jason Kridner
>>
>>Adding devicetree and linux-arm-kernel lists based on feedback on IRC...
>>
>>On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Jason Kridner wrote:
>>> I'd like to discuss moving our current library of cape devicetree
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:32:11PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> The complexity is absolutely required, and it has nothing to do with
>> beaglebone capes.
>>
>> The fact of the matter is that reconfigurable hardware is here,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:32:11PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> The complexity is absolutely required, and it has nothing to do with
> beaglebone capes.
>
> The fact of the matter is that reconfigurable hardware is here, on
> shipping system, and we, as the linux kernel community have to make
On 06/17/2014 08:56 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:37:09AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 06/17/2014 05:09 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> A good way that this could have been done is to put an I2C EEPROM on
>>> each cape, and have that store the DT fragment.
On 17/06/14 10:09, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Why should kernel developers go to the extent of adding support for DT
> modification at runtime when the platform you want this for doesn't even
> support hotplugging of these capes?
I'm not convinced you should, but Grant Likely seemed to be
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:09:31 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:22:50AM -0400, Jason Kridner wrote:
> > Adding devicetree and linux-arm-kernel lists based on feedback on IRC...
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Jason Kridner wrote:
> > > I'd like to disc
On 06/17/2014 11:09 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Here's the most obvious question in the world on this topic. Are capes
hot-pluggable?
"capes" as in Beaglebone capes might not be due to the mechanical
constraints you listed.
"capes" as a concept of pluggable hardware might well be.
Hi Russell,
CCing gcl.
On Jun 17, 2014, at 4:15 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:58:31AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:09:31AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
>>> Why should kernel developers go to the extent of adding support for DT
>>> modif
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:15:22PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:58:31AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:09:31AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > Why should kernel developers go to the extent of adding support for DT
> > > modification at runtime w
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:58:31AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:09:31AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > Why should kernel developers go to the extent of adding support for DT
> > modification at runtime when the platform you want this for doesn't even
> > support hotpluggin
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:09:31AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:22:50AM -0400, Jason Kridner wrote:
> > Adding devicetree and linux-arm-kernel lists based on feedback on IRC...
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Jason Kridner wrote:
> > > I'd like to discuss movi
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:37:09AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 06/17/2014 05:09 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > A good way that this could have been done is to put an I2C EEPROM on
> > each cape, and have that store the DT fragment. The boot loader could
> > have then read that from each c
On 06/17/2014 05:09 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:22:50AM -0400, Jason Kridner wrote:
>> Adding devicetree and linux-arm-kernel lists based on feedback on IRC...
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Jason Kridner wrote:
>>> I'd like to discuss moving our curre
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:22:50AM -0400, Jason Kridner wrote:
> Adding devicetree and linux-arm-kernel lists based on feedback on IRC...
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Jason Kridner wrote:
> > I'd like to discuss moving our current library of cape devicetree
> > overlay sources into a sin
Hi Jason,
>From: Jason Kridner
>
>Adding devicetree and linux-arm-kernel lists based on feedback on IRC...
>
>On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Jason Kridner wrote:
>> I'd like to discuss moving our current library of cape devicetree
>> overlay sources into a single tree, including the boot .dtb
Adding devicetree and linux-arm-kernel lists based on feedback on IRC...
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Jason Kridner wrote:
> I'd like to discuss moving our current library of cape devicetree
> overlay sources into a single tree, including the boot .dtb files for
> BeagleBoard.org boards and
Adding devicetree and linux-arm-kernel lists based on feedback on IRC...
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Jason Kridner wrote:
> I'd like to discuss moving our current library of cape devicetree
> overlay sources into a single tree, including the boot .dtb files for
> BeagleBoard.org boards and
26 matches
Mail list logo
