At 21:08 12/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>I am more comfortable with %N as (as Charlie has said), we know that
>this resolves to "this server".
So would %L be used in a multi-server environment?
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 04:08:13PM +1100, Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> No, you're quite right. I _thought_ we used %N, but we do in fact use %L
>
> I am more comfortable with %N as (as Charlie has said), we know that
> this resolves to "this server".
Done - e-smith-samba-1.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 06:30:06PM -0800, Des Dougan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 17:03 12/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> >Finally, should we be using %L (login server) or %N (netbios name of
> >this server)? We are currently using %N and I don't see a reason to
> >change.
And I was wrong...
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 12:03:06PM +1100, Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> This is my understanding - please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> We currently have (after the backslash fix - thanks Des/Greg):
>
> logon home = \\%N\%U\.profiles
> [...]
On this, can we use slashes
> > How much more would involved beyond designating
> > a 'master' server where users are managed and
> > setting up the others for LDAP replication?
> > Won't PAM authentication against LDAP take care
> > of the rest or would you still need something
> > that emulates NIS from the LDAP database?
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
> > Finally, should we be using %L (login server) or %N (netbios name of
> > this server)? We are currently using %N and I don't see a reason to
> > change.
>
> I suppose it's possible, but very uncommon with an e-smith/SME setup, to be
> logging into one
At 17:03 12/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Finally, should we be using %L (login server) or %N (netbios name of
>this server)? We are currently using %N and I don't see a reason to
>change.
Just to be clear on this - the shipped alpha has %L in both fragments. I
used %N in my current 4.1.2 set-u
> Finally, should we be using %L (login server) or %N (netbios name of
> this server)? We are currently using %N and I don't see a reason to
> change.
I suppose it's possible, but very uncommon with an e-smith/SME setup, to be
logging into one server that authenticates against another. I partici
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 09:59:31AM -0800, David Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a couple of quick suggestions and questions about the
> e-smith-samba-1.1.0-14 rpm. It looks like the template fragments
> 11logonPath and 11logonHome got switched, as they each point to the other
> one's
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 11:22:31AM -0800, Greg Zartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> Des,
>
> I'm not all the experienced with roving profiles as I use local profiles on
> my setup. It seems to me that if you put a period before the profile
> directory, then they would be hidden wouldn't
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:42:42PM -0800, Greg Zartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for all your help on this.
> Thank you Des!!!
>
> You're the one that solved this one. I'll email Gordon directly with the
> changes that need to be made to the two fragments.
Changes received and updat
Hi!
anyone tried to install
Melody WAP Mail 1.5 ? (www.melody.se). I have no success. I got 500 error in
my browser. Cannot figure out what is wrong.
If s.o. know another good WAP mail server that is compatible with e-smith,
please help.
Thanx in advance,
Anton Sabelski
--
Please report
> Thanks for all your help on this.
Thank you Des!!!
You're the one that solved this one. I'll email Gordon directly with the
changes that need to be made to the two fragments.
Regards,
Greg
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security i
At 13:15 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>Second, an additional backslash needs to be added to
>the parameter.
And to the parameter in the 11logonPath fragment - it has the same issue.
Thanks for all your help on this.
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROT
> Setting "logon home = \\\%L\%U\.profiles" works.
Very good. Seems that I've read somewhere that Win9x/Me uses this variable
to store profiles.
Looks like Gordon is on the cc list for this thread so I'm sure he'll modify
the 11logonHome fragment accordingly. I believe, after coming full circle
Greg,
At 11:40 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>Say setting the logon path = \\%L\Profiles\.%U
>
>That is, hide the profiles.
No, this has no effect.
Setting "logon home = \\\%L\%U\.profiles" works.
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to di
At 11:40 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>Say setting the logon path = \\%L\Profiles\.%U
>
>That is, hide the profiles.
In my 4.1.2 version, I have
logon home = \\%N\%U\.profiles
So are you suggesting that Profiles be at a level higher than the home
directory? Let me try this to see how it wil
> Yes, it's straightforward to do. I was suggesting it to the list (well,
> Gordon and Charlie actually) rather than to you. I'd like to see it as a
> default.
Sure, I understand.
I am curious as well if this will work...
Say setting the logon path = \\%L\Profiles\.%U
That is, hide the profi
Greg,
At 11:22 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>. It seems to me that if you put a period before the profile
>directory, then they would be hidden wouldn't they?
Yes, it's straightforward to do. I was suggesting it to the list (well,
Gordon and Charlie actually) rather than to you. I'd like to
> I'd like to suggest that the roaming profile be stored in a hidden
> ..profiles directory by default, or at least in a sub-directory
> of the home
> root. It's too cluttered and seeing USER.DAT is likely to confuse users.
Des,
I'm not all the experienced with roving profiles as I use local prof
Greg,
At 10:56 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>Looks like the fragments need to specify three backslashes when two are
>required in those fragments that utilize perl code.
Yes, three backslashes resolves the issue. Thanks!
I'd like to suggest that the roaming profile be stored in a hidden
.pr
> I think that this is what the problem may be - I see only a
> single \ ahead
> of %L, and the same in the logon path line:
Confirmed. I don't use roaming profiles, so haven't playing with either of
these parameters up until now. This is very strange Perl shouldn't
interpret a \ as an esca
Greg,
At 10:09 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>When you expand the fragment, you should see the parameter
>
>logon home = \\%L\%U in your smb.conf file.
I think that this is what the problem may be - I see only a single \ ahead
of %L, and the same in the logon path line:
logon home = \%
Here's my fragment again. Verify that there is a "{" at the beginning and a
"}" at the end of the fragment. My email client seems to hack them out for
some reason:
{
# Set the home directory of a Win95/98/ME and NT/2000/XP Client
# %L substitutes for this logon servers name
# %N substitutes for t
> I've got a couple of quick suggestions and questions about the
> e-smith-samba-1.1.0-14 rpm. It looks like the template fragments
> 11logonPath and 11logonHome got switched, as they each point to the other
> one's variable, i.e. 11logonPath has logon home = and
> 11logonHome has logon
> path =
> -Original Message-
> From: David Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:00 PM
> Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-14 suggestions
> This automatically maps the U drive (for user :)) to the user's home
> directory, as defined by logon home. I f
Greg,
At 09:52 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>Let me try this again My email client seems to be hacking out the open
>bracket at the beginning of the fragment:
OK, I've made the change, including the bracket :) However, expanding the
templates gives me the same problem. With the trailin
I've got a couple of quick suggestions and questions about the
e-smith-samba-1.1.0-14 rpm. It looks like the template fragments
11logonPath and 11logonHome got switched, as they each point to the other
one's variable, i.e. 11logonPath has logon home = and 11logonHome has logon
path =
Also, I wo
Let me try this again My email client seems to be hacking out the open
bracket at the beginning of the fragment:
{
# Set the home directory of a Win95/98/ME and NT/2000/XP Client
# %L substitutes for this logon servers name
# %N substitutes for this servers netbios name
# %U is user
I apologize as I made an error in the correction I submitted. The logon
home path that I specified has one to made forward slashes. The fragment
should read:
# Set the home directory of a Win95/98/ME and NT/2000/XP Client
# %L substitutes for this logon servers name
# %N substitutes for this
I believe you've found a problem with the current samba fragments. They've
been under heavy development for a few weeks now.
Gordon,
I think the 11logonHome and 11logonPath fragments are in error. First, the
files are "named" backwards. The contents for 11logonHome should be the
contents of 1
Michael,
At 02:14 12/11/2001, Michael Doerner wrote:
>would you please post a small part from smb.conf from 5.1 please?
As requested:
logon path = \%L\Profiles\%U
logon home = \%N\%U\.profiles
logon script = netlogon.bat
There is no "logon drive" directive.
Someone mailed me of
"BeTa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anybody knows what's new in this last alpha version, I would be
pleased.
Summary of differences 5.0 -> 5.1alpha1
---
- Rebranding to Mitel Networks throughout
- Preliminary Passive ISDN support in console (ISDN people, pl
>
> I have a NETLOGON.BAT file which I've scp'd from my production server.
When
> I logon to 5.1, the "net use h: /home /yes" command is not executing. I'm
> getting a message that the syntax is incorrect. The client PC is Win ME
> (yeuchh!).
>
> I suspect that one of the Samba settings has change
Hi,
I've tried to find informations about SME Server v5.1 Alpha... but just
tryied !
If anybody knows what's new in this last alpha version, I would be pleased.
Regards
BeTa
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for
35 matches
Mail list logo
